Flux RSS Global Aerospace World Defense News

Global Aerospace World Defense News

Defense News security coverage report global international analysis technology Military equipment magazine industry armored missile weapons

Belgium Plans to Transfer 10 F-16 Fighter Jets to Help Ukraine Counter New Generation of Russian Drones
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
Belgium plans to deliver 10 F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine by the end of 2026, expanding Kyiv’s air-combat and air-defense capacity as Russian forces increasingly use faster, jet-powered Geran attack drones. The package could also include Belgian-made 20 mm ammunition for the F-16’s M61A1 Vulcan cannon, giving Ukrainian pilots a lower-cost option for engaging drones at close range while preserving limited stocks of AIM-9 Sidewinder and AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles for more demanding aerial threats. Conventional propeller-based UAV interceptors. To preserve finite inventories of advanced AIM-9 and AIM-120 missiles, the transfer includes negotiations to supply 20 mm Vulcan cannon ammunition manufactured by FN Herstal for cost-effective close-range aerial interceptions.

Belgian F-16s will help Ukraine intercept Russia’s fastest jet-powered Geran drones, flying at up to 600 km/h, by using their speed of Mach 2.05 and 20 mm cannons against targets that many Ukrainian interceptor drones cannot overtake. (Picture source: Belgian Air Force)

The expanded commitment increases Belgium’s previous 2026 pledge from seven to 10 aircraft. The earlier package included three combat-capable fighters and four aircraft intended for spare parts, but Belgian authorities have not yet specified how many of the additional aircraft will be fully operational. The acceleration reflects growing pressure on Ukraine’s air-defense network, as faster one-way attack drones become harder for slower interceptor UAVs to engage effectively.

The delivery schedule remains closely linked to Belgium’s transition from the F-16 to the F-35A. Three additional F-35As recently arrived at Florennes, bringing the number based in Belgium to seven, while eight others remain in the United States for pilot training. Belgium’s broader transfer plan covers up to 53 F-16s through 2029, up from an earlier commitment of 30 aircraft by 2028, though it remains unclear whether the three additional aircraft announced for 2026 will come from later planned deliveries.

Related topic:Belgium to deliver first F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine by end of 2026 as Russian air attacks intensify

Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever announced an expanded F-16 commitment on October 15, 2026, after meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the European summit in Brussels. The announcement increased Belgium’s planned 2026 transfer from seven to 10 aircraft, while talks also covered the potential supply of Belgian-made 20 mm ammunition for the F-16’s M61A1 Vulcan cannon to support lower-cost engagements against Russian drones and preserve more expensive air-to-air missiles.

The radar can track 10 targets and support AIM-120 engagements against six under compatible configurations, supplemented by Link 16, GPS, APX-113 identification equipment with a nominal 185 km range, and helmet-mounted cueing compatibility. Belgian weapons integration covers AIM-9, AIM-120 and AGM-65 missiles, GBU-10/12/24 laser-guided bombs and GBU-31 JDAMs, although the equipment accompanying Ukrainian transfers remains unspecified. The principal limitation is that Belgium applies an 8,000-flight-hour retirement threshold, reached by F-16 FA-95 on September 8, 2023, after nearly 6,500 flights. The three fighters initially allocated for Ukrainian combat operations are approaching that limit, making remaining certified flight hours more important than their upgraded avionics when determining how intensively Ukraine can employ them.

As explained at the start, Russia's jet-powered Geran drones are narrowing the performance margin available to Ukrainian interceptors. The Geran-3, derived from the Iranian Shahed-238, reaches 300 km/h, the Geran-4 reaches 350 km/h, and the Geran-5 can reach 500 km/h, with faster variants approaching 600 km/h. At 500 km/h, a Geran-5 covers 50 km in six minutes, compared with 15 minutes for a propeller-driven drone flying at 200 km/h, reducing the interval available for detection, interception and a second engagement by nine minutes. Ukrainian interceptors currently traveling at 460 to 500 km/h subsequently cannot overtake a Geran-5 in straight pursuit, whereas a 500 km/h interceptor closes on a Geran-4 at 2.5 km per minute.

Russian drones also incorporate MESH communications modems costing an estimated $3,500, enabling communications relay and operator-controlled targeting updates against moving vehicles. Ukrainian intelligence estimates Russia's Geran-4 and Geran-5 manufacturing capacity at 3,000 per month, equivalent to 100 per day, although this does not establish actual launch rates. With a top speed of Mach 2.05 (2,500 km/h), Belgian F-16s can engage these faster targets, but every interception consumes flight hours and maintenance capacity needed for cruise missile interception or operations against Russian tactical aircraft. Ukraine's F-16 fleet has destroyed more than 3,150 aerial targets and conducted more than 650 ground strikes since entering service in August 2024, according to figures announced by Air Force Commander Lieutenant General Anatolii Kryvonozhko on September 29.

The interceptions include 2,500 UAVs and 666 cruise missiles, equivalent to 3.75 drones for every cruise missile and monthly averages of 121 aerial interceptions and 25 ground strikes. During Russia's September 29 attack, Ukraine destroyed 18 of 29 jet-powered drones, an interception rate of 62.1%, while more than 100 UAVs had been launched by 18:00. Ukrainian F-16s have also engaged Russian fighters: on July 21, U.S. General Dan Caine confirmed an F-16 air-to-air victory associated with the July 8 destruction of a Su-35S. That Russian fighter carries an Irbis-E radar, two AL-41F1S engines producing 142 kN each with afterburner, and R-77-1 and R-37M missiles, the latter capable of engagements beyond 200 km. The Ukrainian missile type and engagement distance remain undisclosed, but the engagement illustrates how Ukraine's F-16 fleet must support three competing missions: drone and cruise missile interception, operations against Russian fighters, and strikes against ground targets.

The M61A1 Vulcan cannon is becoming an important part of Ukraine's F-16 ammunition requirements because it offers a cheaper alternative to AIM-9 and AIM-120 missiles against Russian drones, but Ukraine's ammunition requirements are substantial. The six-barrel 20 × 102 mm weapon carries 511 rounds and fires up to 6,000 rounds per minute, equivalent to 100 rounds per second. Ukrainian estimates indicate an expenditure of 150 rounds per successful drone interception, or 1.5 seconds of firing, allowing three such engagements per load with 61 rounds remaining. At a projected consumption of 10,000 rounds daily, Ukraine would need 300,000 rounds monthly; a 30,000-round shipment would therefore cover three days of consumption, while 100,000 rounds would cover 10 days. Ukraine began negotiating additional supplies with European manufacturers in September, including possible involvement by FN Herstal.

De Wever also confirmed further ammunition discussions on October 15 without announcing quantities, with Spain and Poland also involved in similar replenishment efforts. Ukraine is attempting to reduce the reliance on F-16s against jet-powered Gerans by developing faster interceptor UAVs, with 20 domestic manufacturers participating in the effort. Fourteen companies are conducting flight tests, six have successfully intercepted jet-powered targets, three are developing systems considered particularly promising, and two models, including the Predator and Khyzhak, have completed military codification. Current interceptors reach 460 to 500 km/h, while some manufacturers are pursuing speeds of 700 km/h, providing only a 100 km/h closing-speed advantage against a Geran traveling at 600 km/h.

At that relative speed, an interceptor launched 10 km behind its target would require six minutes to close the distance, excluding maneuvering and acceleration. One manufacturer expects to produce 400 interceptors by late October, but required quantities are not anticipated before late November. At one interceptor per target, 400 units would cover four days of launches at Russia's estimated 100-drone daily manufacturing capacity, assuming production translated directly into launches. Future Russian drones potentially reaching 800-900 km/h would again create a performance gap even for the faster Ukrainian interceptor designs, prolonging demand for fighter-based interception. Russia's jet-powered drones increasingly threaten Ukrainian military logistics because higher speeds and operator-controlled targeting enable faster attacks against moving vehicles and infrastructure beyond the front line.

Russia launched 4,951 attack drones in July 2026, with Ukraine reporting an 87% interception rate, but the growing proportion of jet-powered Gerans compresses the interval available for radar detection, command decisions, interceptor launch and a possible second engagement, particularly when several targets approach from different directions. MESH communications links allow targeting updates during flight, increasing the threat to locomotives, railway traffic and road transport moving ammunition, fuel and personnel more than 100 km behind Ukrainian positions. Attacks against locomotives can interrupt transport even when the railway tracks remain intact, while attacks on electrical substations can affect both civilian power distribution and railway operations.

Jet-powered drones have also been used against urban areas, including the August 21 attack involving two Shahed-type drones against a shopping center in Kryvyi Rih that killed 15 people and injured 130. Ukrainian estimates place jet-powered drones at 40% of Russian attack UAVs in some operations and above 60% along certain axes. Their increasing use forces Ukraine to divert F-16s from intercepting cruise missiles, deterring Russian tactical aviation, and conducting ground strikes, consuming finite aircraft flight hours even when the drones are destroyed. Belgium's revised transfer commitment must therefore ultimately be assessed against the structural condition of the airframes and the maintenance capacity available to keep them flying.

The initial allocation included three airworthy fighters approaching Belgium's retirement threshold and four non-flying aircraft for spare engines, landing gear, avionics and hydraulic components. On October 14, Belgian Defense Minister Theo Francken confirmed that transferring the three operational aircraft required U.S. and French third-party authorizations, including French approval relating to electronic warfare equipment. Belgium has also worked with Ukraine on F-16 maintenance since February 2025, while Sabena Aerospace Engineering received a $235 million U.S. maintenance and logistics contract.

Additionally, Poland's WZL-2 facility is being considered for additional servicing. Belgium's previous schedule envisaged seven aircraft in 2026, five in 2027, 14 in 2028 and 27 in 2029, placing 50.9% of the 53-aircraft plan in its final year. Whether the new 10-aircraft commitment changes those later allocations remains unknown, as does the remaining certified flight time of the F-16s involved. The operational outcome will depend on how many fighters can generate sorties, how many drones they intercept, and how much maintenance and ammunition each interception requires.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, South Korea, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.
US F-22 Raptor stealth fighter commands YFQ-44A Fury combat drone in simulated air combat for first time
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
On October 16, 2026, the U.S. Air Force announced that an F-22 Raptor stealth fighter pilot successfully issued in-flight tactical commands to Anduril's FQ-44A Fury Collaborative Combat Aircraft during a flight demonstration over California. The test demonstrated a division of command authority where the pilot assigns mission-level objectives while the uncrewed aircraft's onboard autonomy software independently manages dynamic flight maneuvers and simulated combat tasks. This operational milestone supports the U.S. Air Force's broader strategic goal of fielding 500 combat-ready semi-autonomous aircraft by 2032 and an eventual fleet of 1,000 units.

The U.S. Air Force demonstrated an F-22 Raptor commanding a YFQ-44A Fury combat drone during simulated air combat, paving the way for fighter pilots to control multiple autonomous aircraft carrying additional weapons and sensors. (Picture source: US DoD)

On October 16, 2026, the U.S. Air Force announced that an F-22 Raptor stealth fighter had successfully directed Anduril's YFQ-44A Fury Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) during an airborne tactical-control demonstration conducted earlier that month. The F-22 pilot issued mission-level commands that the Fury's onboard autonomy software interpreted and executed, including dynamic flight maneuvers and simulated air combat tasks. The experiment involved one F-22 and one YFQ-44A, and the pilot did not remotely operate the Fury's flight controls, instead assigning actions while the purpose-built uncrewed fighter aircraft independently managed their execution. This distinction is central to the U.S. Air Force's CCA concept of using crewed fighters to command additional combat aircraft without assigning a separate remote pilot to each drone. It also represents a step toward the service's objective of fielding 500 combat-ready semi-autonomous aircraft by 2032, followed by an eventual inventory of 1,000 CCAs.

The demonstration tested a division of command authority in which the F-22 pilot acted as tactical commander, assigning objectives while the YFQ-44A autonomously managed its flight path, speed, altitude, and maneuvers. This arrangement differs from conventional remote piloting because the fighter pilot does not need to operate the drone's flight controls while simultaneously managing the F-22's radar, weapons and defensive systems. The test involved the 412th Test Wing, 422nd Test and Evaluation Squadron, 309th Software Engineering Group, CCA Experimental Operations Unit, F-22 System Program Office and CCA Software Autonomy and Teaming Branch. The event also demonstrated real-time mission retasking rather than the simple execution of a fixed preprogrammed route. However, the U.S. Air Force did not disclose the maximum communications distance, command-response latency, autonomous task-completion rate, or number of pilot interventions required for future CCA squadrons, all of which affect whether one pilot can supervise several CCAs against several airborne threats.

Related topic:Netherlands finances two US Air Force CCA prototypes to develop F-35 drone-teaming experience

The F-22's existing AN/APG-77 AESA radar can track multiple targets while scanning, with an estimated detection range of 201 to 241 km against an aircraft with a radar cross-section of 1 m², while its AN/ALR-94 electronic warfare system uses more than 30 antennas to detect certain radar emissions beyond 463 km under favorable conditions. Sensor fusion combines these detections with identification and communications systems, enabling the pilot to prioritize threats and potentially assign a CCA to investigate or intercept them. The Raptor also incorporates the Inter/Intra-Flight Data Link, MIDS-JTRS terminals supporting Link 16, and upgraded mission processors to accommodate additional software functions, although the control of a CCA requires compatible command interfaces. Its two Pratt & Whitney F119 engines each generate 156 kN of thrust, supporting supercruise near Mach 1.8 and operations above 15,000 m. With six internally carried AIM-120 AMRAAMs and two AIM-9 Sidewinders, the F-22 could retain its own weapons while directing additional armed CCAs, provided that communications and targeting information remain available.

The YFQ-44A originated from Blue Force Technologies' Fury design, developed under a 2022 U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory contract, before Anduril acquired the company in September 2023. Selected for CCA Increment 1 in April 2024, the Fury first flew in October 2025 and progressed to weapons integration in 2026. Earlier design figures included a 6.1 m length, a 5.2 m wingspan, a 2,270 kg maximum gross weight, and a projected Mach 0.95 speed, although none of which establishes the final production FQ-44's performance. Test aircraft have carried two external weapons stations, with four planned to accommodate up to four AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles. In July 2026, a Fury launched an AIM-120 using externally supplied targeting information processed through Anduril's Lattice autonomy software and human weapons authorization, without a confirmed physical intercept. Additional integration work has reportedly involved GBU-54 Laser JDAMs, GBU-39/B Small Diameter Bombs and LAU-131A/A rocket pods. During a July 20 exercise at Creech Air Force Base, a two-person team also completed an inert-missile replacement in single-digit minutes, to develop rapid rearming procedures during dispersed operations.

The October test also belongs to a longer sequence of U.S. experiments that progressively expanded fighter-drone command functions. In October 2025, an F-22 already directed an MQ-20 Avenger over the Nevada Test and Training Range using the Government Reference Architecture for Collaborative Engagement (GRACE) and software-defined radios, while a February 2026 flight added changes to the Avenger's mission profile, flight path, and combat air patrol assignments. In May 2026, an F-35 controlled an airborne MQ-20 while remaining on the ground, while July 2025 experiments involved F-16C and F-15E fighters that examined cooperation with two XQ-58A Valkyries. F-35As also flew alongside the Fury in July 2026, but did not directly control them. The October F-22 demonstration was therefore the first confirmed airborne tactical-control flight involving the Raptor and a purpose-built YFQ-44A, with future CCA compatibility considered for F-35A, F-16, F-15E, F-15EX and Boeing F-47 fighters.

The CCA program has also advanced beyond selecting experimental aircraft; the U.S. Air Force's CCA Increment 1 program involves Anduril's FQ-44 Fury and General Atomics' FQ-42 Vengeance, with an initial emphasis on air-to-air combat. Both manufacturers received development selections in April 2024 and engineering, manufacturing development and production contracts in June 2026. The service intends to field 500 combat-ready CCAs by 2032, within an eventual inventory of 1,000 units, and is examining configurations involving two drones per crewed fighter. At the targeted $20 million air-vehicle ceiling, 500 CCAs would cost $10 billion, and 1,000 would cost $20 billion, excluding sensors, weapons, development and sustainment. The CCA Experimental Operations Unit is also developing ground-control, maintenance, launch, and recovery procedures to examine how these unmanned aircraft can operate without the same personnel and infrastructure requirements as conventional fighter squadrons. Another planned step is Exercise Emerald Flag in December 2026, when the Fury and the Vengeance are expected to participate in their first large-force employment exercise.

Comparable programs across the world demonstrate different levels of fighter-drone integration. France conducted a July 13, 2026 Rafale F4 flight with a NAMIB-equipped drone that geolocated a radar emitter several dozen kilometers away and transmitted targeting information for a simulated engagement. In June 2026, a Turkish Bayraktar Kizilelma and an M-346FA demonstrated airborne formation changes, separation, and rejoining. Australia's MQ-28A Ghost Bat conducted an autonomous AIM-120 engagement in December 2025 involving F/A-18F Super Hornets and an E-7A Wedgetail, although the E-7A exercised drone command. In June 2025, one E-7A operator controlled two MQ-28s and a third simulated unmanned aircraft. Russia's experiments involving the Su-57D and the S-70 Okhotnik, Sweden's Gripen-related A1/A2/A3 concepts, Airbus's Eurofighter/XQ-58A work, South Korea's KF-21/LOWUS teaming, India's CATS Warrior and China's J-20S-related programs are also pursuing crewed-uncrewed cooperation, but formation flying and planned integration do not establish direct tactical control from a fighter cockpit.

The operational benefit of fighter-controlled CCAs is the ability to further distribute weapons and sensors without involving more fighter crews. For instance, an F-22 carrying six AIM-120s and commanding two FQ-44s with four AIM-120s each would control 14 medium-range missiles, increasing its nominal missile inventory by 133% if the planned four-missile Fury configuration becomes operational. Forward-positioned drones could subsequently launch missiles from different directions, while sensor-equipped aircraft could collect targeting information without requiring the crewed fighter to approach every threat. However, successful engagements would still depend on target identification, track accuracy, missile guidance, and human authorization. Communications jamming or interruption could prevent mission updates even if onboard autonomy maintained controlled flight. An autonomous aircraft may continue flying after losing communications, but it may be unable to receive updated target assignments or authorization to employ weapons, even though the October demonstration established that one F-22 pilot could direct one Fury through simulated combat operations.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, South Korea, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.
US Marines reactivate oldest flying squadron with F-35Bs after 52 years of Harrier jump jet operations
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
The U.S. Marine Corps has activated Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 231 (VMFA-231) as its tenth operational F-35B Lightning II unit, completing the squadron’s transition from the AV-8B Harrier II. The move adds fifth-generation stealth strike, beyond-visual-range air combat, and advanced electronic warfare capabilities to II Marine Expeditionary Force, strengthening the Marines’ ability to conduct expeditionary operations from austere bases and amphibious ships.

Compared to the AV-8B Harrier II, the F-35B allows U.S. Marine squadrons to fly faster and farther, evade enemy radars, and attack more heavily defended targets while still operating from amphibious ships and short runways. (Picture source: US DoD)

The U.S. Marine Corps has added another operational F-35B Lightning II squadron to II Marine Expeditionary Force, strengthening its ability to conduct stealth strike, beyond-visual-range air combat, reconnaissance, and electronic warfare from expeditionary bases and amphibious assault ships. Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 231 (VMFA-231) becomes the service’s tenth operational F-35B unit after transitioning from the AV-8B Harrier II.

On October 9, 2026, the U.S. Marine Corps formally activated Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 231 (VMFA-231) as an F-35B Lightning II squadron at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina, completing its transition from the AV-8B Harrier II after 52 years of Harrier operations. Established on February 8, 1919, VMFA-231 has participated in conflicts from Nicaragua and Guadalcanal to the Gulf War, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and now becomes the Marine Corps’ tenth operational F-35B squadron toward a planned force of twelve. Lieutenant Colonel Spencer S. Waters assumed command of the squadron, which belongs to Marine Aircraft Group 14, 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing, and II Marine Expeditionary Force.

Related topic:U.S. Marine Corps to retire last AV-8B Harrier II jet in June 2026 as F-35B takes over

Its first deployment for training is planned for late October, ahead of its future Initial Operational Capability (IOC), which remains dependent on aircraft availability, qualified pilots, maintenance personnel, and operational mission certifications. To date, the U.S. Marine Corps has not announced a definitive IOC date or confirmed the squadron's final aircraft inventory. The F-35B introduces substantial differences for VMFA-231: its Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-600 engine produces 191 kN of thrust with afterburner, compared with 106 kN from the AV-8B's Rolls-Royce Pegasus F402-RR-408. The F-35B reaches Mach 1.6, carries 6,125 kg of internal fuel, has a maximum takeoff weight of 27,216 kg, and offers a published combat radius exceeding 833 km. By comparison, the AV-8B reaches Mach 0.9, carries 3,519 kg of internal fuel, and has a maximum takeoff weight of 14,061 kg.

The F-35B accommodates up to 6,803 kg of weapons internally and externally, compared with 4,200 kg externally for the Harrier, although STOVL operations impose additional fuel and payload restrictions. Its shaft-driven lift fan, three-bearing swivel exhaust nozzle, and roll-control ducts enable short takeoffs and vertical landings, whereas the Harrier relied on four rotating exhaust nozzles connected directly to its Pegasus engine. Unlike the Harrier, the F-35B also incorporates internal weapons bays and low-observable construction, permitting missions with a reduced radar signature. VMFA-231's origins date to February 8, 1919, when it was established in Miami, Florida, as 1st Division, Squadron 1, before becoming Marine Observation Squadron One (VO-1M) on July 1, 1922. On July 16, 1927, ten personnel under Major Ross E. Rowell participated in the Battle of Ocotal, Nicaragua, conducting an early dive-bombing attack against hostile ground forces with five de Havilland DH-4B-1 two-seat biplanes.

The squadron moved to Hawaii in January 1941, received SB2U Vindicator dive bombers, and was redesignated VMSB-231 on July 1, before participating in the defense of Midway during the opening months of the Pacific War. On August 30, 1942, it reached Guadalcanal with SBD Dauntless dive bombers, joining the Cactus Air Force during operations against Japanese forces. By October 3, eleven of its twelve original SBDs had been destroyed or rendered unserviceable, leaving only one of the initial aircraft operational. It resumed combat operations in the Marshall Islands in February 1944, converted to F4U Corsair fighters in October, and received credit for destroying seven Japanese aircraft in air-to-air combat during the war. It was deactivated in March 1946, reactivated in the Marine Corps Reserve in September 1948, and deactivated again on August 31, 1962.

VMA-231 returned to active service on May 15, 1973, equipped with the Hawker Siddeley AV-8A Harrier vertical/short-takeoff-and-landing (V/STOL) jump jet. On October 4, 1976, it deployed aboard the USS Franklin D. Roosevelt (CV-42) with Carrier Air Wing 19, conducting operations and visits involving Spain, Italy, Egypt, and Kenya, while also participating in activities aboard the USS Guam (LPH-9). After returning to Cherry Point on April 20, 1977, it was converted to the McDonnell Douglas AV-8B Harrier II during the mid-1980s. The AV-8B introduced a larger composite wing, revised intakes, increased weapons capacity, and improved avionics, while later Night Attack and Harrier II Plus configurations incorporated night-attack equipment and the AN/APG-65 radar. These aircraft supported Marine ground units from amphibious assault ships, expeditionary airfields, and forward operating locations, shortening the distance between aircraft and supported troops until May 2025, when the squadron ended its Harrier operations.

During Operation Desert Storm, Marine Corps AV-8Bs operated from forward bases as close as 65 km from Kuwait, and the service's Harrier force completed 3,380 sorties and 4,083 flight hours, with a mission-capable rate exceeding 90% and average turnaround times of 23 minutes during the ground offensive. Beginning on January 17, 1991, the squadron attacked Iraqi artillery positions threatening the Saudi border town of Khafji and subsequently conducted strikes against Iraqi vehicles, weapons positions, and other ground targets. Its aircraft expended 1,660 Mk 82 bombs, 62 Mk 83 bombs, 969 Mk 20 Rockeye cluster bombs, 78 Mk 77 incendiary bombs, and 22,709 rounds of 25 mm ammunition, totaling 767,475 kg of ordnance. On February 9, 1991, Captain Russell A. C. Sanborn was shot down by an Iraqi surface-to-air missile over Kuwait, captured, and repatriated on March 6.

Following the war, six AV-8Bs deployed aboard the USS Saipan (LHA-2) in September 1991, while a November 1992 deployment divided fourteen jets at MCAS Iwakuni, Japan, from six supporting amphibious operations from Cherry Point. VMA-231 subsequently participated in NATO operations over the Balkans, deploying aboard the USS Kearsarge (LHD-3) and USS Wasp (LHD-1) during 1995 and 1996, including operations associated with the rescue of U.S. Air Force Captain Scott O'Grady and Operation Deny Flight. In April 1999, the squadron supported Operation Allied Force against Yugoslavia from the USS Kearsarge, alongside Joint Guardian, Shining Hope, and Avid Response. Its Harriers participated in the 2003 invasion of Iraq and returned to Al Asad Air Base in spring 2007, completing 1,738 combat sorties and more than 5,158 flight hours, averaging over 2.97 hours per sortie, compared with 1.21 hours in 1991.

From November 2009 into 2010, the squadron conducted close air support from Afghanistan's Kandahar International Airport during Operation Enduring Freedom. Throughout these deployments, the Harrier's principal tasks remained close air support and interdiction, while air superiority, long-range surveillance, and suppression of sophisticated air defenses generally required other aircraft. For VMFA-231, the F-35B expands the missions that a Marine expeditionary fighter squadron can perform from amphibious ships and forward airfields, particularly against opponents equipped with modern fighters and air defense systems. Its AN/APG-81 AESA radar, AN/AAQ-37 Distributed Aperture System, AN/AAQ-40 Electro-Optical Targeting System, and AN/ASQ-239 electronic warfare suite provide several detection and targeting capabilities unavailable on the AV-8B.

AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles now enable engagements beyond visual range, while internal weapons carriage reduces radar exposure compared with the Harrier's external stores. From amphibious assault ships, VMFA-231 could now defend an amphibious force against hostile aircraft, locate coastal air defense radars, identify targets for other forces, and conduct precision strikes before supporting U.S. Marines ashore. This reduces the dependence on separate fighter and reconnaissance aircraft for some tasks, although it does not replace dedicated airborne early warning, electronic attack, or aerial refueling assets. The U.S. Marine Corps' wider acquisition objective comprises 420 F-35s, including 280 F-35Bs and 140 F-35Cs, making squadron conversion part of a broader restructuring of tactical aviation. However, the principal limitation is sustaining these new capabilities under expeditionary conditions.

The F-35B requires specialized maintenance, low-observable repairs, mission-data support, and sufficient spare parts, while V/STOL weight restrictions logically constrain available fuel and weapons loads. These constraints also affect readiness, with the Congressional Budget Office finding that F-35B availability declined from roughly 65% for new aircraft to 43% by their sixth year in service in its historical assessment, compared with roughly 59% to 43% for AV-8Bs between their eighth and twentieth years. The operational benefit for II MEF will therefore depend on VMFA-231's ability to sustain these additional missions from amphibious ships and dispersed airfields, rather than simply replacing the Harrier's ground-attack capability with a more advanced VTOL aircraft.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, South Korea, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.
General Atomics Tests New ESM System on Gray Eagle ER Drone to Detect Enemy Air Defenses Beyond Engagement Zones
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
General Atomics has completed flight testing of a Sierra Nevada Corporation Electronic Support Measures (ESM) system aboard theU.S. Army’s MQ-1C Gray Eagle ER, the company announced on October 15, 2026, strengthening the drone’s ability to detect and track hostile air-defense activity while remaining farther from enemy threat zones. By combining a compact ESM payload with Gray Eagle ER’s long range and endurance, the aircraft can collect electronic emissions associated with Integrated Air Defense Systems and provide targeting-relevant intelligence before higher-value assets move closer to the threat, expanding its role from traditional surveillance and strike missions into persistent electromagnetic sensing for operations against increasingly sophisticated air defenses.

GA-ASI has completed flight testing of Sierra Nevada Corporation’s ESM system aboard the MQ-1C Gray Eagle ER, expanding the U.S. Army drone’s ability to detect hostile air defense activity from greater standoff distances (Picture Source: General Atomics)

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. (GA-ASI) has achieved another important milestone in the modernization of the U.S. Army’s MQ-1C Gray Eagle Extended Range (ER), strengthening the aircraft’s role as a persistent long-range sensor for contested operations. In an official announcement issued on October 15, 2026, GA-ASI confirmed completion of flight testing of the Sierra Nevada Corporation (SNC) Electronic Support Measures (ESM) system aboard Gray Eagle ER. The development is particularly significant for the Army’s ability to detect and support the targeting of hostile Integrated Air Defense Systems (IADS) while maintaining greater standoff from enemy threat envelopes.

The flight testing represents a significant step in expanding the Gray Eagle ER beyond its established intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and strike missions. According to GA-ASI, the SNC-produced ESM is a small-form-factor detection and collection system that combines with Gray Eagle’s range and persistence to provide commanders with critical information on hostile IADS activity. For U.S. forces facing increasingly sophisticated air-defense networks, the importance lies not simply in extending detection range, but in improving awareness of the electromagnetic battlespace before higher-value assets are required to operate closer to the threat.

Related Topic: U.S. Army National Guard to Field Eight Gray Eagle 25M Drones in Arizona for Potential Golden Dome Support

A key operational advantage of the new ESM capability is its ability to detect hostile emitters and support targeting while the MQ-1C Gray Eagle ER remains outside enemy Weapon Engagement Zones (WEZ). This could position the drone as a forward electromagnetic sensor, exploiting its endurance and standoff range to monitor adversary air-defense activity without requiring higher-value or crewed platforms to penetrate deeper into contested airspace. GA-ASI says this approach can increase mission assurance for U.S. forces operating within an Area of Responsibility (AOR), allowing Gray Eagle ER to look deeper into the battlespace while remaining beyond identified threat ranges. Persistent ESM coverage could also provide commanders with earlier indications of hostile radar activity, contribute targeting-relevant intelligence, and help reduce the exposure of crewed Army aviation. Against layered Integrated Air Defense Systems, the ability to locate and characterize emitters from standoff range could inform subsequent reconnaissance, targeting, suppression, or avoidance decisions. GA-ASI also highlights advanced Crewed-Uncrewed Teaming as a key benefit, with Gray Eagle ER potentially operating ahead of crewed aircraft as a persistent electromagnetic sensor and passing threat information back to the force to improve situational awareness and aircraft survivability.

For the U.S. Army, the ESM integration should also be viewed within the wider evolution of Gray Eagle into a multi-intelligence platform supporting Multi-Domain Operations. In April 2026, GA-ASI announced an Army contract to enhance Gray Eagle ER’s Electronic Intelligence capability, including advanced radar detection and signal-collection technology integrated with SNC. The platform has also demonstrated Communications Intelligence, Synthetic Aperture Radar/Moving Target Indicator capabilities and Mobile Ad Hoc Network radios. During Project Convergence Capstone 5, Gray Eagle ER conducted persistent Detect, Identify, Locate and Report missions in an electronically contested environment while supporting tactical networking and cross-cueing between multiple intelligence capabilities.

That progression provides important context for the latest flight test. In October 2025, the U.S. Army had already awarded GA-ASI a contract to integrate an additional C5ISR Modular Open Suite of Standards-compliant electronic warfare capability onto Gray Eagle, building on previous integration of Electronic Attack, communications relay, Counter-UAS and Signals Intelligence functions. The new SNC ESM flight test therefore appears as part of a broader and deliberate modernization path rather than an isolated payload demonstration. GA-ASI’s Modular Open Systems Architecture is central to that approach, allowing new mission systems to be integrated more rapidly as operational requirements and threats evolve.

From an operational perspective, this increasingly diverse sensor architecture strengthens Gray Eagle’s potential contribution to the Army’s wider sensor-to-shooter network. Detecting a hostile IADS component represents one element of the targeting process; the greater battlefield advantage comes from combining information from multiple sensors, developing an accurate operational picture and moving relevant information rapidly toward commanders and appropriate fires or effects. The Army has separately emphasized the importance of reducing sensor-to-shooter timelines and integrating Gray Eagle capabilities into Multi-Domain Operations, reinforcing the strategic value of an aircraft able to provide persistent sensing, targeting support and connectivity from standoff range.

Completion of the SNC ESM flight-test effort reinforces GA-ASI’s continuing contribution to the modernization of U.S. Army aviation and demonstrates the adaptability that has become central to the Gray Eagle family. The significance is not simply that the aircraft can accommodate another sensor, but that the Army is progressively developing Gray Eagle into a more capable standoff intelligence and electromagnetic sensing platform able to generate operational value before friendly forces have to enter the most dangerous portions of an adversary’s engagement envelope.

Against sophisticated IADS designed to restrict freedom of maneuver and increase the risks facing U.S. and allied aviation, that capability is increasingly consequential. By combining Gray Eagle ER’s endurance, range and modular architecture with advanced electronic support capabilities from SNC, GA-ASI is helping provide American commanders with deeper situational awareness, greater mission assurance and additional options for protecting crewed forces. The latest milestone further underscores Gray Eagle’s transformation from a traditional persistent ISR and strike UAS into an increasingly sophisticated multi-domain sensing node, one designed to help the U.S. Army see farther, understand the threat environment earlier and preserve freedom of action in contested battlespace.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
U.S. Army National Guard to Field Eight Gray Eagle 25M Drones in Arizona for Potential Golden Dome Support
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
Arizona will become the first state to field an Army National Guard company equipped with eight Gray Eagle 25M unmanned aircraft, with General Atomics confirming on October 12, 2026, that deliveries are scheduled for September 2027. Offering nearly 40 hours of endurance, EagleEye multi-mode radar, electro-optical/infrared sensors, and an open architecture for new payloads and effects, the Gray Eagle 25M will give Guard forces a persistent reconnaissance, surveillance, and targeting capability for combat missions abroad and homeland defense at home, while marking the first step in a broader plan to equip all eight Army National Guard divisions with dedicated long-endurance unmanned aviation units.

Arizona will become the first Army National Guard state to field the Gray Eagle 25M, adding eight long-endurance unmanned aircraft in 2027 for overseas missions and homeland defense (Picture Source: General Atomics Aeronautical Systems)

Arizona is poised to become the launch point for a significant expansion of advanced unmanned aviation across the U.S. Army National Guard, bringing a modernized long-endurance unmanned aircraft capability directly into the Guard’s divisional force structure. In an announcement issued on October 12, 2026, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. (GA-ASI) confirmed that it and the Arizona Army National Guard have finalized planning for the expected arrival of eight Gray Eagle® 25M unmanned aircraft systems in September 2027. Arizona will consequently become the first state to establish an Army National Guard UAS company equipped with the new-generation Gray Eagle 25M, marking an important step in strengthening both expeditionary combat capabilities and the Guard’s potential contribution to the defense of the U.S. homeland.

Arizona is part of the Army National Guard’s 40th Infantry Division, but the initiative reaches far beyond a single state. The Army National Guard’s stated objective is to establish eight Divisional UAS Companies, one for each of its divisions, while GA-ASI says four additional units are scheduled for fielding by the end of 2029. Three Gray Eagle 25M Guard units are currently funded by Congress and already under contract with GA-ASI. Once operational, the aircraft can support Combatant Command missions overseas while also contributing to operations against threats in the Western Hemisphere and domestic missions such as disaster response. Strategically, organic Gray Eagle 25M formations will give Guard divisions persistent reconnaissance, targeting, communications and mission-planning capacity under their own divisional structure, strengthening their ability to integrate into demanding U.S. joint and multi-domain operations.

Related Topic: U.S. Coast Guard MQ-9B Drone Order Sharpens America’s Long-Range Maritime Surveillance Edge

At the center of this transformation is the Gray Eagle 25M, the modernized evolution of the Gray Eagle ER developed for the U.S. Army’s expeditionary and Multi-Domain Operations requirements. The aircraft combines nearly 40 hours of endurance, substantial payload capacity and an open architecture designed to accommodate evolving sensors, communications systems and kinetic or non-kinetic effects. Its delivered sensor configuration includes GA-ASI’s EagleEye® multi-mode radar and electro-optical/infrared systems, with additional payload options available. The “M” designation reflects a broader modernization package that GA-ASI says includes open-architecture aircraft and ground systems, advanced datalinks and an upgraded propulsion system, allowing capabilities to be integrated as operational requirements evolve. GA-ASI also reports that the wider Gray Eagle system has surpassed one million hours of safe operations, including experience with automatic takeoff and landing.

Gray Eagle 25M’s importance extends well beyond conventional intelligence collection. According to GA-ASI, the aircraft can support long-range organic sensors and Launched Effects, allowing it to operate at greater stand-off distances during terrestrial and maritime missions while supporting counter-UAS and Reconnaissance, Surveillance and Target Acquisition operations. Its open architecture and onboard processing also position the aircraft as an airborne information and communications node capable of supporting fires, maneuver, intelligence and networked operations while working alongside manned Army aviation. For the National Guard, this means conducting persistent RSTA missions without placing an aircrew aboard the aircraft and developing the mission planning, communications and targeting expertise required to employ the system effectively in combat. GA-ASI describes Gray Eagle 25M as becoming the only UAS in the ARNG’s arsenal, underscoring the significance the company attaches to its introduction into Guard formations.

The most strategically significant dimension may be the aircraft’s potential relationship with Golden Dome for America. GA-ASI specifically states that Gray Eagle 25M’s endurance, payload capacity and open architecture could potentially enable the Army National Guard to become an asset for Golden Dome missions. That statement does not constitute confirmation that Gray Eagle 25M has been formally assigned to the Golden Dome architecture. It nevertheless points toward a credible supporting role. Official U.S. defense planning describes Golden Dome as a next-generation homeland missile-defense architecture integrating current and future sensors, command-and-control systems and defensive capabilities against ballistic, hypersonic and cruise-missile threats. Within such a system of systems, Gray Eagle 25M’s most plausible contribution would be as a persistent airborne sensing, communications, data-relay or networking platform capable of extending situational awareness and feeding information into a wider defense architecture, not as a stand-alone missile-defense solution.

The Arizona fielding also highlights the continuing importance of General Atomics Aeronautical Systems to American unmanned aviation and the U.S. defense industrial base. Rather than simply producing another aircraft variant, GA-ASI has progressively evolved the Gray Eagle family through improved propulsion, datalinks, computing, sensors and government-controlled open architecture intended to make future upgrades easier to incorporate. The company says its wider Predator-series fleet has accumulated more than nine million flight hours, reflecting decades of operational experience across the unmanned aviation sector. That accumulated engineering base gives the United States an important advantage: advanced autonomy, sensors, communications and mission systems can be introduced into an established American aircraft ecosystem instead of requiring an entirely new platform for every emerging requirement. Gray Eagle 25M represents not only a new Guard capability, but also the results of sustained U.S. investment and GA-ASI innovation in persistent, adaptable unmanned aviation.

When Arizona receives its first eight Gray Eagle 25Ms, expected in September 2027, the milestone will represent far more than the creation of a new unmanned aircraft company. It will begin the introduction of an organic long-endurance UAS capability that can strengthen U.S. Army National Guard reconnaissance, targeting, communications, counter-UAS, disaster-response and global combat operations while creating new options for supporting U.S. homeland defense. Its potential connection to Golden Dome is particularly significant, even though a formal role has not yet been publicly confirmed. By combining the National Guard’s unique domestic and expeditionary responsibilities with GA-ASI’s proven American unmanned-aircraft expertise and an architecture designed for continued modernization, Gray Eagle 25M offers the United States a flexible new tool for confronting evolving threats while keeping American forces farther from danger and reinforcing the technological strength of the nation’s defense enterprise.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
U.S. Air Force Tests Mk21A Reentry Vehicle for Future Sentinel Intercontinental Ballistic Missile
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
The U.S. Air Force has completed a new flight test of the developmental Mk21A reentry vehicle for the future LGM-35A Sentinel ICBM, advancing a critical component of America’s next-generation land-based nuclear deterrent. Launched aboard a Minotaur I rocket from Vandenberg Space Force Base on October 9, 2026, the unarmed Mk21A was exposed to realistic flight and reentry conditions, providing engineers with valuable data to reduce technical risk ahead of integration with Sentinel and strengthen the reliability and credibility of the U.S. strategic deterrent.

The U.S. Air Force tested a developmental Mk21A reentry vehicle aboard a Minotaur I rocket for the future LGM-35A Sentinel ICBM, shown here in a Lockheed Martin artist rendering of the Mk21A in flight (Picture Source: Lockheed Martin)

The United States has taken another measured step in the modernization of its land-based strategic deterrent, advancing a technology intended to support the future LGM-35A SentinelICBM enterprise. During an unarmed flight on October 9, 2026, the U.S. Air Force tested a developmental Mk21A reentry vehicle aboard a Minotaur I rocket launched from Vandenberg Space Force Base, California. U.S. Strategic Command and Vandenberg Space Force Base confirmed the mission as an in-flight environmental test supporting development of the Air Force’s new Mk21A reentry vehicle.

The distinction between this mission and a full Sentinel missile flight is significant. The developmental Mk21A was carried aboard a Northrop Grumman-provided Minotaur I launch vehicle, rather than an LGM-35A Sentinel, with the U.S. Space Force’s Rocket Systems Launch Program supporting the launch. Using a dedicated launch platform provides a means of exposing developmental payload technology to demanding flight conditions while the wider Sentinel architecture continues to mature. This approach can allow engineers to gather valuable real-world information on individual components before they advance toward later integration. The Air Force has not publicly released detailed performance measurements from the mission, meaning the event should be viewed as an important developmental milestone rather than evidence of completed qualification or operational readiness.

Related Topic: China Developed a Hypersonic Glide Vehicle Capable of Launching Air-to-Air Missiles at Extreme Range

At the center of the test was the Mk21A reentry vehicle, a next-generation system being developed by Lockheed Martin. Reentry vehicles operate through one of the most technically demanding portions of an intercontinental ballistic missile mission profile, requiring their design to withstand the severe environmental conditions associated with high-speed atmospheric reentry while protecting the systems contained within them. An in-flight environmental test can provide engineering information that complements laboratory testing, computer modeling, simulation and other ground-based development work. The importance of such testing extends beyond completion of the flight itself: telemetry and associated engineering data can help validate design assumptions, improve modeling and identify areas requiring further refinement. The October mission also follows previous publicly announced Mk21A flight-testing activity, reinforcing the incremental development path being pursued for the new reentry vehicle.

Another important dimension of the Mk21A program is its position within the Air Force’s phased modernization strategy for Sentinel. Official Air Force information indicates that Sentinel is expected to be fielded initially with the existing Mk21 reentry vehicle before subsequently transitioning to the next-generation Mk21A. This makes the Mk21A more than a component associated with Sentinel’s initial deployment. Instead, it forms part of the system’s longer-term technological evolution. Such a phased approach provides the United States with a pathway to introduce new capabilities progressively as individual technologies mature, rather than requiring every major subsystem to reach operational maturity simultaneously. For a strategic system intended to remain relevant over several decades, that flexibility is particularly important.

The Mk21A test should also be considered within the much broader scope of the Sentinel modernization enterprise. Sentinel is not simply a replacement missile for the long-serving LGM-30G Minuteman III. The program encompasses the missile itself alongside new launch infrastructure, command-and-control capabilities, communications systems and supporting facilities associated with the land-based component of the U.S. nuclear triad. The U.S. Air Force has emphasized modularity and an open-architecture approach as important aspects of Sentinel, providing a framework intended to support future upgrades throughout the system’s service life. In that context, Mk21A development represents one element of a far wider effort to renew an entire strategic capability rather than replace a single platform in isolation.

The significance of the October flight lies not in dramatic claims about a single test, but in the disciplined modernization process it represents. By flying an unarmed Mk21A reentry vehicle aboard a Minotaur I, the Air Force is gathering the engineering evidence necessary to mature a critical future technology while maintaining appropriate caution about its developmental status. Combined with the planned transition from Mk21 to Mk21A and the broader modernization of the Sentinel enterprise, the test demonstrates continued U.S. investment in maintaining a safe, secure, reliable and credible strategic deterrent. As Sentinel development progresses, the Mk21A will remain an important part of a long-term effort designed to preserve continuity, strengthen technological readiness and ensure that the United States can sustain its land-based deterrence mission well into the future.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
New Zealand signs $1.5 billion deal with U.S. for five MH-60R Seahawk helicopters to track submarines
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
On October 16, 2026, New Zealand signed an agreement with the United States to acquire five Sikorsky MH-60R Seahawk maritime helicopters to replace its eight Kaman SH-2G(I) Super Seasprites, with initial deliveries starting in 2030. The NZ$2.748 billion procurement, comprising NZ$1.648 billion in capital expenditure and NZ$110 million in annual operating funds over ten years, addresses existing frigate capability gaps by introducing dedicated surface strike, anti-submarine detection, and real-time Link 16 tactical data integration. Despite a 37.5 percent fleet size reduction, the platform transition introduces AN/AQS-22 low-frequency dipping sonars, AN/APS-153(V) radars, AGM-114R Hellfire missiles, and Mk 54 Mod 0 torpedoes aboard Anzac-class frigates.

New Zealand has signed a deal to acquire five US-made MH-60R Seahawk helicopters to replace eight Seasprites, equipping its naval frigates with improved submarine-hunting capabilities, lightweight torpedoes, and precision-guided weapons from 2030. (Picture source: Australian MoD)

On October 16, 2026, New Zealand signed an agreement with the United States to acquire five Sikorsky MH-60R Seahawk maritime helicopters to replace its eight older Kaman SH-2G(I) Super Seasprites currently serving with the Royal New Zealand Navy (RNZN), with deliveries beginning in 2030. The acquisition involves NZ$1.648 billion ($927.1 million) in capital expenditure and NZ$110 million ($61.9 million) in average annual operating funding over ten years, totaling NZ$2.748 billion ($1.546 billion). Following the selection by New Zealand of the MH-60R on August 21, 2025, Washington approved potential sales worth $1.5 billion for the helicopters and $69 million for torpedoes on June 5, 2026. The planned armament includes AGM-114R Hellfire missiles, APKWS rockets and Mk 54 Mod 0 torpedoes, alongside dipping sonars, magnetic anomaly detectors and Link 16 terminals. Although the helicopter fleet will shrink by 37.5%, the MH-60Rs will introduce additional capabilities aboard the Anzac-class frigates HMNZS Te Kaha (F77) and HMNZS Te Mana (F111), which have no dedicated ship-launched anti-ship strike missiles.

The MH-60R Seahawk combines the anti-submarine functions of the SH-60F with the maritime surveillance and surface warfare capabilities of the SH-60B. It measures 19.76 m in overall length, reaches 333 km/h, and has a range of 963 km, equivalent to 520 nautical miles. Two General Electric T700-GE-401D turboshaft engines provide propulsion, while folding rotor blades, a hinged tail, and corrosion protection facilitate shipboard storage. The wider SH-60 family has a 16.36 m main rotor, a height of 5.23 m and a maximum takeoff weight of 9,926 kg, although these figures are not separately confirmed for New Zealand's configuration. Three crew members operate four 8 × 10-inch multifunction displays, managing navigation, acoustic sensors, radar and weapons, while the MH-60R can transport more than 1,500 kg of cargo in utility configuration, supporting replenishment between frigates and shore facilities, personnel transfers and maritime rescue operations.

Related topic:US accepts Taiwan's preliminary request for up to 20 MH-60R Seahawk helicopters to counter Chinese submarines

New Zealand will also acquire five AN/AQS-22-based Airborne Low Frequency Sonar systems and five digital magnetic anomaly detectors, providing each helicopter with active acoustic search and supplementary submarine localization capabilities. The sonar lowers a transducer beneath a hovering helicopter, while the magnetic detector measures disturbances produced by submerged metallic objects. AN/SSQ-53 DIFAR passive sonobuoys can operate at depths up to 300 m after deployment from altitudes reaching 9,144 m, while AN/SSQ-62 DICASS active sonobuoys reach 460 m and can be deployed from 9,000 m. AN/SSQ-36 bathythermograph sonobuoys measure temperature profiles affecting acoustic propagation, although procurement quantities for these three types remain unspecified. A separate US$69 million package covers 20 Mk 54 Mod 0 lightweight torpedoes, equivalent to four rounds per helicopter across the procurement inventory, plus exercise weapons, air-launch accessories, containers and training equipment.

The surveillance package detailed in the earlier FMS includes five AN/APS-153(V) multimode radars capable of surface-contact tracking and automatic periscope detection, alongside AN/AAS-44C(V) electro-optical and infrared targeting systems with laser ranging. Five AN/ALQ-210 electronic support measures systems will detect radar emissions without requiring the helicopter to transmit actively. Seven Link 16 terminals comprise five installed units and two spares, while 14 GPS/inertial navigation systems with anti-spoofing modules comprise ten installed units and four spares. The AN/ARQ-59 Hawklink provides helicopter-to-ship communications, supported by AN/ARC-210 RT-2036 secure radios and AN/APX-123 identification-friend-or-foe transponders. For their part, the AN/AAR-47 missile-warning equipment and AN/ALE-47 countermeasure dispensers provide defensive functions, allowing the MH-60R helicopters to combine surveillance, contact identification, and tactical information exchange beyond their frigates' radar horizons.

The weapon inventory includes 65 AGM-114R Hellfire missiles, averaging 13 per helicopter, and 225 APKWS 70 mm guided rockets, averaging 45 per aircraft. The AGM-114R uses semi-active laser guidance and a multipurpose warhead, while each APKWS employs 225 WGU-59A/B guidance sections for smaller precision engagements. M299 missile launchers can support established MH-60R configurations carrying up to eight Hellfires across two four-rail launchers, although New Zealand's launcher quantities remain unspecified. The package also includes LAU-61 rocket launchers, four M36E8 captive training missiles, five M240D 7.62 mm machine guns and GAU-21 12.7 mm guns. These weapons will permit the two frigates to engage suitable patrol boats and fast attack craft through an embarked helicopter, but will not replace the range or warhead capacity of dedicated heavy anti-ship missiles.

A five-aircraft fleet leaves limited reserves when both Anzac-class frigates deploy simultaneously. Embarking one MH-60R aboard Te Kaha and another aboard Te Mana commits 40% of the inventory, leaving three helicopters for training, maintenance and other missions. At an illustrative 80% availability rate, four helicopters would be available on average, falling to three at 60%, although New Zealand has announced neither target. Under the latter scenario, two deployed helicopters would consume 66.7% of available aircraft, leaving one for other flying requirements. RNZN aircrew will fly the MH-60Rs, while RNZAF No. 6 Squadron will maintain them, continuing the Seasprite arrangement. Whether five Seahawks can sustain more anti-submarine patrol hours for New Zealand than eight Seasprites will depend on serviceability, trained crews, sonobuoy stocks and maintenance cycles, not simply the newer helicopters' individual capabilities. RNZAF Base Auckland at Whenuapai will receive temporary facilities and infrastructure-design funding, while permanent infrastructure, training systems and complementary uncrewed aircraft remain subject to future investment decisions.

The first deliveries are scheduled for 2030, but the fifth aircraft's delivery date, operational capability milestones and Seasprite retirement timetable remain unconfirmed. Australia provides the principal regional comparison, having operated MH-60Rs since 2014 and maintained 23 helicopters in October 2026 following a 2021 loss in the South China Sea. Thirteen additional helicopters, ordered in 2022, are expected to begin arriving in late 2026, increasing the planned Royal Australian Navy inventory to 36 Seahawks. That force is intended to support 14 simultaneous shipborne helicopter flights through three operational squadrons and one training squadron. Combined with New Zealand's five Seahawks, the planned bilateral MH-60R inventory will reach 41 aircraft, with New Zealand accounting for 12.2%. Australia's separate purchase of 40 UH-60M Black Hawks will bring the combined H-60-family inventory to 81 aircraft, although those army helicopters have different mission equipment. Common MH-60R configurations may support shared training, maintenance, and spare parts arrangements, but no pooled inventory or joint operational structure has been confirmed.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, South Korea, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.
Saab rolls out Sweden's first GlobalEye early warning aircraft to guard Baltic Sea and NATO's northern flank
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
On October 15, 2026, Saab presented the Swedish Air Force’s first S 106 GlobalEye airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft at its Linköping production facility. The rollout marks the official transition of aircraft number 061 into ground and flight testing prior to operational delivery, filling the surveillance gap left by Sweden's donation of two ASC 890 aircraft to Ukraine. Based on the Bombardier Global 6000 airframe, the platform delivers multi-domain radar coverage across the Baltic Sea and northern Scandinavia to strengthen national and NATO airspace defense.

Sweden ordered two S 106 GlobalEye aircraft from Saab in June 2022, added a third in June 2024 after deciding to transfer its two ASC 890 surveillance aircraft to Ukraine, and accelerated GlobalEye deliveries in October 2024. (Picture source: Saab)

On October 15, 2026, Saab unveiled Sweden's first S 106 GlobalEye airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft, numbered 061, at its Linköping facility, where it will undergo ground and flight testing before being delivered to the Swedish Air Force. The aircraft is the first of three purchased for SEK 9.9 billion (€887.4 million) to replace the Saab 340 ASC 890 previously used for national airspace surveillance. This also follows Sweden's decision to transfer two ASC 890 surveillance aircraft to Ukraine in 2024. Defence Minister Pål Jonson, Air Force Chief Major General Jonas Wikman and Saab CEO Micael Johansson attended the presentation.

Based on the Bombardier Global 6000, the S 106 GlobalEye combines an Erieye Extended Range radar with a 650 km instrumented range, maritime and ground surveillance sensors, and an endurance exceeding 11 hours. Its introduction also coincides with NATO's decision to acquire up to ten GlobalEye aircraft, creating the prospect of joint surveillance operations. Sweden's Defence Materiel Administration (FMV) ordered two GlobalEye aircraft in June 2022 for SEK 7.3 billion (€654.3 million) and a third in June 2024 for SEK 2.6 billion (€233.0 million), while retaining an option for a fourth.

Related topic: Netherlands signs Letter of Intent with Sweden to procure Saab GlobalEye early warning aircraft

The original delivery schedule called for two aircraft in 2027 and one in 2029, but Stockholm accelerated the program in October 2024 after announcing the transfer of its two older ASC 890s (also known as S 100B Argus and Saab 340 AEW&C) to Ukraine on May 29. The older S 100D Argus carried a PS-890 Erieye radar with a 300 to 400 km detection range, a 7,620 m service ceiling and an endurance exceeding five hours. Their replacement with three GlobalEyes extends individual missions beyond 11 hours and increases radar coverage, although three aircraft must still accommodate operational sorties, maintenance and training simultaneously. However, the new Swedish-Dutch arrangement could improve maintenance rotation and crew training, while Sweden's new TP 106 government transport aircraft shares the same airframe, permitting commonality in certain maintenance procedures and spare parts.

The first two Swedish GlobalEyes will initially receive an interim configuration before receiving additional equipment, while the third is planned in the final configuration, but the precise differences and associated modification costs remain undisclosed. To create the S 106 GlobalEye, Saab converts a Canadian Bombardier Global 6000 long-range business jet at Linköping by reinforcing its fuselage and wings, installing the dorsal radar assembly, improving electrical generation and cooling capacity, and modifying the vertical stabilizer and ventral strakes. Established GlobalEye configurations incorporate five operator workstations, satellite communications, tactical data links, electronic surveillance equipment, as well as radar and laser warning receivers with countermeasure dispensers.

Sweden's first aircraft appears to lack the external electro-optical/infrared sensor fairing fitted to Emirati GlobalEyes, and its vertical-tail profile also differs slightly. The Swedish fleet also uses the Global 6000 rather than the newer Global 6500, whose Rolls-Royce Pearl 15 engines, revised wing and avionics improve the underlying business jet's maximum speed and range by 10%. The Erieye ER radar is housed in a 10 m dorsal assembly and uses an active electronically scanned array incorporating GaN transmitters/receivers, for an instrumented range of 350 nautical miles, equivalent to 648 km. At 10,668 m altitude, it can detect certain low-flying threats beyond 400 km, although actual detection depends on target radar cross-section, altitude, propagation, electronic interference, and the selected surveillance mode. Saab attributes a 70% increase in detection range compared with earlier Erieye radars, corresponding to a theoretical 2.89-fold increase in surveillance area for equivalent detection geometry.

The fixed antenna provides 300° azimuth coverage, with reduced coverage directly forward and aft of the aircraft. However, adaptive beam steering allows the radar to allocate additional observation time on selected contacts or sectors, supporting the tracking of low-altitude aircraft, drones, and cruise missiles against ground clutter and in jamming conditions. The GlobalEye's sensor configuration also includes the Seaspray 7500E X-band maritime radar, which uses Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) for surface imaging, Inverse SAR for vessel classification, and Ground Moving Target Indication (GMTI) for tracking moving vehicles. At sea, the combination of the Erieye ER and this maritime radar permits surveillance of ships, small boats, jet-skis, and periscope-sized contacts under suitable conditions, while passive ESM/ELINT receivers detect radar and communications emissions.

AIS receivers identify cooperative maritime traffic, while IFF and ADS-B support aircraft identification. Radar tracks, electronic emissions and identification data are combined at the mission workstations before transmission to fighter jets, naval units and ground-based air defense commands. The absence of the Emirati electro-optical installation on Sweden's first aircraft is operationally relevant, as visual and infrared identification requirements cannot be assumed to be identical between the two nations, as Sweden maintains surveillance over the Baltic Sea, the Gulf of Bothnia and approaches to northern Scandinavia. Saab had secured 12 firm GlobalEye orders by October 16, 2026: five delivered to the UAE between 2020 and 2024, three for Sweden, two for France and two for an unidentified Middle Eastern customer.

France's December 2025 contract is worth SEK 12.3 billion (€1.103 billion), with deliveries planned for 2029-2032, while the July 2026 Middle Eastern contract is valued at SEK 10.1 billion (€905.3 million), for delivery in 2030. Their respective contract-value averages are SEK 6.15 billion (€551.2 million) and SEK 5.05 billion (€452.6 million) per aircraft, compared with SEK 3.3 billion (€295.8 million) across Sweden's three orders, although equipment and support differences prevent direct price comparisons. Additionally, Canada is negotiating for six aircraft, NATO up to ten and the Netherlands one, potentially increasing the combined order book to 29 aircraft if all negotiations result in contracts.

Saab is also pursuing an increase in annual GlobalEye production capacity from two to six aircraft, with delivery schedules dependent on airframe availability, mission-system integration and customer-specific configurations. Sweden's S 106 introduction coincides with NATO's decision on July 7, 2026, to purchase the GlobalEye, after reconsidering its November 2023 decision to purchase six Boeing E-7 Wedgetails to replace its E-3A Sentry fleet. The proposed acquisition covers up to ten GlobalEyes and involves eleven countries: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Romania and Sweden.

The Netherlands separately signed its own letter of intent on September 10, 2026, to acquire one aircraft for delivery in 2031, with Dutch crews potentially training alongside Swedish personnel from 2028. Sweden's three aircraft, France's two contracted aircraft and the proposed Dutch aircraft would form a fleet of six nationally owned European GlobalEyes, potentially increasing to 16 with NATO's ten aircraft. Sweden is expected to become NATO's first national GlobalEye operator, with its initial S 106 delivery planned for 2027, ahead of the proposed Dutch aircraft and the alliance's future fleet.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, South Korea, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.
Israel signs $1 billion deal for 12 new US AH-64E Apache attack helicopters with maritime strike capabilities
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
On October 14, 2026, the Israeli Ministry of Defense finalized an agreement with the United States to acquire 12 Boeing AH-64E Apache Guardian attack helicopters in a procurement deal valued at approximately $1 billion. The procurement provides the Israeli Air Force with Version 6 capabilities, featuring long-range AN/APG-78 Longbow fire control radar, enhanced maritime strike and targeting functions, and manned-unmanned teaming capabilities for real-time drone control. The contract was completed after Israel resolved an internal $288 million budget financing dispute between its Defense and Finance ministries to preserve the initial 12-aircraft batch from a broader 30-helicopter U.S. authorization.

These 12 AH-64Es will join Israel's existing Apache fleet, which combines two generations of the U.S. attack helicopter: the AH-64A Peten, acquired in 1990, and the AH-64D Saraf, which followed in April 2005. (Picture source: US DoD)

On October 14, 2026, the Israeli Ministry of Defense signed an agreement with the United States to acquire 12 Boeing AH-64E Apache Guardian attack helicopters, with deliveries expected in the early 2030s and a value estimated at $1 billion. The order covers 40% of the 30 helicopters authorized by Washington under a potential $3.8 billion FMS sale earlier in 2026, leaving 18 helicopters outside the signed agreement. The contract was finalized six days after Israel missed the U.S. ordering deadline because of a $288 million financing dispute between the Israeli Defense and Finance ministries. The AH-64E Version 6 helicopters will replace or supplement Israel's 23 AH-64A Peten and 20 AH-64D Saraf helicopters that have been in service for more than two decades, introducing a Longbow radar with a detection range of 16 km, compared with 8 km for earlier configurations, alongside improved engines, maritime targeting functions, and connectivity with reconnaissance drones.

The agreement was finalized on instructions from Israeli Defense Ministry Director General Maj. Gen. (Res.) Amir Baram after the government approved additional funding. The estimated $1 billion package averages $83.3 million per helicopter, compared with $126.7 million under the earlier $3.8 billion authorization, although both amounts include associated equipment and are not directly comparable production prices. The purchase had stalled after the Defense and Finance ministries failed to agree on financing for $288 million, despite three U.S. deadline extensions. Israel subsequently approved transferring NIS 1 billion to defense procurement, reportedly from its 2027-2029 Arab community development program, with another NIS 68 million coming from the 2026 state budget. The financial adjustment allowed the original 12-aircraft quantity to be retained without committing Israel to the other 18 helicopters covered by U.S. authorization, and neither the delivery dates, expected between 2030 and 2033, nor squadron assignments have been announced.

Related topic:Why Australia chose U.S.-made AH-64E Apache to replace its French Tiger attack helicopters

Israel began operating the AH-64A Peten in 1990 and had acquired 42 helicopters of this version by 2000, before receiving its first AH-64D Saraf in April 2005. Its current Apache fleet comprises 23 AH-64As, progressively modernized toward the AH-64Ai standard, and 20 AH-64D-Is equipped with Israeli-made Elta communications suite, Elbit mission-management equipment, Rafael Combat Net, and Elisra electronic self-protection systems. Israel previously considered acquiring up to 48 AH-64Ds in 2000, but disagreements over access to U.S. software and subsequent financial restrictions contributed to the modernization of existing AH-64As instead. The 12 new AH-64Es will represent 27.9% of the existing fleet, meaning a one-for-one replacement would leave 31 older Apaches, while retaining all 43 would increase the nominal inventory to 55. However, by 2032, Israel's earliest AH-64As will have served for 42 years and its first AH-64Ds for 27 years, increasing maintenance and airframe fatigue considerations.

The AH-64E uses two General Electric T700-GE-701D engines producing 1,994 shaft horsepower each, giving 3,988 shp combined, compared with 3,780 shp for the AH-64D's T700-GE-701C engines and 3,392 shp for the earlier AH-64A's T700-GE-701 engines. These respective increases of 5.5% and 17.6% are accompanied by upgraded composite rotor blades, a strengthened transmission, and improved drivetrain components. The helicopter retains a 14.63 m main rotor and a maximum gross weight of 10,433 kg, while its performance includes a maximum speed of 293 km/h, a cruise speed of 265 km/h, and a service ceiling of 6,400 m. The improved drivetrain is particularly relevant to operations in hot weather, where reduced air density affects rotor lift and engine performance, especially when carrying external weapons and fuel. During the AH-64E's first combat deployment to Afghanistan in 2014, the U.S. Army recorded an improvement of 32 km/h over earlier AH-64Ds and an increase in flight duration from 2.5-3 hours to 3-3.5 hours.

The AH-64E Version 6 incorporates an upgraded AN/APG-78 Longbow fire control radar mounted above the rotor, allowing crews to scan an area while keeping most of the helicopter concealed behind terrain. Its cited detection range increases from 8 km to 16 km, expanding theoretical circular coverage from 201 km² to 804 km², while Longbow functions include tracking up to 128 targets and prioritizing 16 for engagement. Lockheed Martin's M-TADS/PNVS Arrowhead combines infrared observation, optical targeting, and laser designation, while helmet-mounted sights allow either crew member to direct the 30 mm cannon. The Version 6 additionally incorporates maritime targeting functions to detect and engage surface vessels, including smaller targets operating in coastal waters. For Israel, these latter functions are relevant to operations along the Mediterranean coastline and near Gaza, where helicopters may be required to distinguish small vessels from other maritime traffic.

The AH-64E retains the Apache's M230E1 30 × 113 mm Chain Gun with 1,200 rounds and a selectable firing rate reaching 625 rounds per minute. Its four underwing stations can accommodate 16 AGM-114 Hellfire missiles, commonly associated with engagement distances of 6.5 to 8 km, or up to 76 Hydra 70 rockets in four nineteen-round launchers, while mixed configurations allow crews to combine missiles, rockets, and additional fuel. Israeli Apaches also employ Spike missiles, including the Spike NLOS, capable of engaging targets beyond 25 km, more than three times the commonly cited Hellfire range. The U.S. Army began integrating the Spike NLOS onto AH-64Es in 2020, permitting attacks against suitable targets from greater distances using the helicopter's electro-optical guidance capabilities, although target acquisition and communications remain necessary. Israel has not confirmed its AH-64E missile inventory or national weapons configuration, while the U.S. authorization covers launchers without specifying missile quantities.

The AH-64E's manned-unmanned teaming (MUM-T) capability, for its part, allows crews to receive information from compatible drones and, depending on interoperability level, control their sensors, weapons, or flight functions. Four interoperability levels extend from indirect reception of sensor information to direct UAV flight control, with U.S. AH-64Es having operated alongside RQ-7 Shadow and MQ-1C Gray Eagle drones. During the 2014 Afghanistan deployment, UAV cooperation contributed to 60% of the AH-64E crews' direct-fire engagements, while the participating unit accumulated 11,000 flight hours and maintained an 88% readiness rate during the April-September period. This approach allows drones to observe roads, vehicles, and firing positions while the helicopter remains behind terrain or outside the immediate engagement area. For Israel, an integration with compatible national drones could reduce the time required to locate dispersed armed groups, monitor movements near the Gaza border, and coordinate helicopter fire with ground troops, although this specific compatibility has not been specified in the AH-64E announcement.

Israeli Apache operations have progressively expanded from anti-tank warfare into armed reconnaissance, close air support, targeted strikes, and limited air defense missions. During the 1990s, AH-64A Petens attacked Hezbollah positions in southern Lebanon, including the February 16, 1992, strike that killed Hezbollah Secretary-General Abbas al-Musawi, and supported Israeli forces before their May 2000 withdrawal. During the Second Intifada, Apaches conducted surveillance and targeted strikes against Hamas leaders Ahmed Yassin and Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi in 2004. In the 2006 Lebanon War, AH-64As and AH-64D Sarafs provided fire support, and the attack helicopters subsequently participated in operations in Gaza, including Operation Cast Lead in 2008-2009, for attacks against armed personnel, vehicles, and fixed positions, some of which caused civilian casualties. On February 10, 2018, an Israeli Apache intercepted an Iranian UAV entering from Syria, demonstrating a secondary air defense role. Since October 7, 2023, the Israeli Apache fleet has conducted rapid-response strikes, aerial surveillance, and fire support during operations against Hamas and other armed groups in and near Gaza, as well as missions requiring identification of dispersed targets and coordination with ground troops, including in densely populated areas.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, South Korea, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.
U.S. Air Force Targets 2028 MMA Strike Drone Prototypes to Replace MQ-9 Reapers in Combat Missions
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
The U.S. Air Force plans to deploy operational prototypes of its Massed Modular Aircraft (MMA) autonomous drones to replace the MQ-9 Reaper in long-range reconnaissance and strike missions. Designed for lower-cost production and large-scale deployment, these aircraft could let U.S. forces sustain surveillance and precision strikes in contested airspace where conventional drones face growing threats from enemy air defenses.

A U.S. Air Force MQ-9 Reaper assigned to the 119th Wing takes off during Exercise Southern Strike 2021, as the service plans to introduce operational prototypes of its MMA replacement drones in 2028. (Picture source: U.S. DoD)

The U.S. objective is to establish a fleet of several hundred autonomous drones that can operate in contested military environments. The schedule calls for an initial operational capability in 2028, followed by the start of large-scale production in 2029. Eventually, these aircraft are expected to complement and gradually assume some of the missions currently carried out by MQ-9 Reapers, whose surveillance and attack capabilities remain central to U.S. air operations.

During a presentation on October 14, 2026, at the AUSA exhibition in Washington, as part of a conference dedicated to Project Agincourt, Air Force Secretary Troy Meink outlined the next stages of the MMA program. According to objectives presented by U.S. officials, the Air Force intends to introduce approximately 100 aircraft by 2029 before expanding the fleet to 500 drones by 2032. Meink also confirmed that contracts associated with the system's development had recently been awarded, although he did not identify the recipients or disclose their values.

Seven companies had previously been identified as participants in the competition: Anduril, Chaos Industries, General Atomics, Grid Aero, Otto Aerospace, Shield AI, and Swarm Aero. The program is being conducted with support from the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), a Pentagon organization responsible for facilitating the integration of commercially developed technologies into U.S. military capabilities. This approach is intended to allow the Air Force to evaluate different industrial solutions and shorten the transition from prototype development to serial production.

Related News: US Air Force shortlists seven companies to replace MQ-9 Reaper with 500 new MMA combat drones

The MMA follows an acquisition strategy that differs from traditional military drone programs. Rather than relying exclusively on sophisticated aircraft manufactured in limited quantities, the U.S. Air Force is seeking a relatively inexpensive autonomous system that can be produced rapidly and deployed in large numbers. The target price is approximately $10 million per aircraft, excluding weapons, sensors, and mission equipment. By comparison, the Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA), primarily intended to accompany crewed fighter aircraft during combat missions, has a target unit cost of approximately $20 million.

The requirements focus on range, payload capacity, and adaptability to different missions. Future MMA aircraft are expected to achieve a flight range of approximately 6,400 kilometers, nearly twice the distance envisioned for the CCA. They are also intended to carry substantial military payloads, although no definitive sensor or weapons configuration has been disclosed. Turboprop propulsion is among the solutions under consideration, prioritizing endurance and efficiency over long distances rather than maximum speed.

he program also includes an open architecture designed to accommodate different reconnaissance equipment, detection systems, and weapons without requiring extensive modifications to the aircraft's basic design. This modular approach could allow drones to be configured for armed surveillance, intelligence gathering, or strike missions. Unlike the MQ-9 Reaper, initially developed as a remotely piloted aircraft, the MMA is expected to incorporate autonomous functions that reduce the need for human intervention during certain phases of flight and mission execution.

The introduction of MMA aircraft could change how the U.S. military employs drones in areas protected by modern air defense systems. A fleet comprising several hundred aircraft would allow commanders to distribute reconnaissance assets across multiple sectors, maintain persistent surveillance, and conduct strikes without relying exclusively on more expensive aircraft. The planned range is particularly relevant in the Pacific, where the distances between air bases and operational areas create substantial logistical constraints. A larger inventory would also provide greater flexibility in absorbing potential losses in heavily defended environments.

This development also addresses the operational limitations of medium-altitude, long-endurance (MALE) drones against modern air defense networks. The MQ-9 Reaper remains an important asset for intelligence collection and precision strikes, but its relatively low speed and lack of advanced stealth characteristics restrict its employment in highly contested airspace. The MMA seeks to address these vulnerabilities through a combination of lower costs, autonomous capabilities, and deployment in greater numbers. Its development is proceeding alongside the FQ-42A Vengeance and FQ-44A Fury programs, which address different requirements within the future U.S. combat aviation fleet.

The announced schedule nevertheless presents an industrial challenge. Moving from operational prototypes in 2028 to large-scale production in 2029 requires a rapid manufacturing expansion, adapted evaluation procedures, and sufficient funding. Meink has emphasized the importance of incorporating manufacturing requirements from the initial design stages. The objective is to establish an industrial production capacity capable of delivering several hundred aircraft within a few years while keeping costs compatible with large-scale procurement.

The MMA program comes as U.S. military operations against Iran have exposed the vulnerability of MQ-9 Reapers to modern air defenses. According to a Congressional Research Service report published on October 5, 2026, at least 45 Reaper drones were reportedly lost since the beginning of Operation Epic Fury in February, with some shot down by Iranian air defenses and others destroyed under different operational circumstances. These losses illustrate the limitations of relying on relatively expensive aircraft whose replacement requires considerable investment. By prioritizing lower-cost autonomous drones manufactured in large quantities, the U.S. Air Force aims to maintain its reconnaissance and strike capabilities despite the attrition encountered in high-intensity conflicts. A fleet of 500 MMA aircraft by 2032 could strengthen the ability of the United States to sustain surveillance and strike operations across multiple theaters.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written By Erwan Halna du Fretay - Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group
Erwan Halna du Fretay holds a Master’s degree in International Relations and has experience studying conflicts and global arms transfers. His research interests include security and strategic studies, particularly the dynamics of the defense industry, the evolution of military technologies, and the strategic transformation of armed forces.
India unveils first AI-driven fighter drone FWD Supreme for long-range strikes and fighter escort
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
On October 13, 2026, Bengaluru-based Flying Wedge Defence & Aerospace unveiled a full-scale static prototype of the FWD Supreme in New Delhi, introducing a platform designed as India's first indigenous AI-driven autonomous combat drone. The aircraft is engineered for reconnaissance, electronic warfare, strikes, and loyal wingman operations alongside crewed fighters under a proprietary multi-drone concept. The initiative aims to reduce procurement costs by deploying low-cost autonomous airframes to augment conventional fighter fleets.

The FWD Supreme program aims to provide India with an affordable AI-piloted combat drone capable of autonomous reconnaissance and strikes over a proposed 1,500 km range while coordinating groups of 15 to 20 loyal wingmen alongside crewed fighters. (Picture source: X/@ShivanChanana)

On October 13, 2026, the Indian company Flying Wedge Defence & Aerospace (FWDA), based at Bengaluru, unveiled a full-scale static prototype of the FWD Supreme in New Delhi, introducing what could become India's first indigenous AI-driven autonomous combat drone for reconnaissance, electronic warfare, strikes, and cooperation with crewed fighters. Founded in 2022 by Suhas Tejaskanda, Flying Wedge is developing the 250 kg Supreme Lite demonstrator and the larger Supreme Heavy, targeting a payload capacity of 350 kg, a maximum speed of Mach 0.85, and a range exceeding 1,500 km. The company's proposed Mobbing Doctrine would assign 15 to 20 AI-piloted loyal wingmen to one crewed fighter, with unit prices targeted at $3 to 5 million, compared with the company's $100 million benchmark for a conventional fighter. India's Ministry of Defence acquisition chief A. Anbarasu attended the unveiling, but no government contract or funding has been confirmed. At the time of writing, the Supreme Heavy remains a static prototype, while the Supreme Lite has completed taxi trials but has not flown.

The Supreme Heavy's initial configuration combines a 10 m-long, 10 m-wide flying-wing airframe with an internal weapons bay and a propulsion system generating 5 kN of combined thrust. Its intended takeoff weight would range between 1,000 and 1,500 kg, although the final configuration remains unresolved. At 1,500 kg, its 350 kg payload would represent 23.3% of the drone's total weight, leaving 1,150 kg for fuel, engines, structure, and onboard systems; its static thrust-to-weight ratio would be around 0.34 at that weight, or 0.51 at 1,000 kg, before accounting for aerodynamic drag. Flying Wedge targets cruising speeds of 500 to 600 km/h, a maximum speed of Mach 0.8 to 0.85, a range above 1,500 km, and endurance exceeding two hours. These are design objectives, not flight-tested performance, but the company already develops the Kaal Bhairava, India's first AI-enabled Medium-Altitude Long-Endurance (MALE) drone, which features a range of up to 3,000 km, over 30 hours of flight endurance, AI-driven target recognition, and swarm coordination capabilities.

Related topic:India to purchase 60 Ghatak stealth combat drones for future autonomous deep strike force

Flying Wedge intends to use the Supreme Lite, which weighs 250 kg, to reduce the development risks associated with the larger variant, which would have six times the takeoff mass if the Supreme Heavy ultimately weighs 1,500 kg. To validate flight control, navigation and autonomy before development advances, two smaller configurations have completed taxi trials, covering ground handling, steering, braking and propulsion response, but neither has demonstrated sustained flight. The company initially targeted a maiden flight during the third quarter of 2026, ending September 30, but missed that objective. On October 13, Tejaskanda indicated that the first flight could take place within six to eight weeks, placing the target in late November or December. Chief Technology Officer Girish G. Dixit, who previously worked on the LCA Tejas, indicated that the Supreme Heavy's detailed design was 50% complete.

Testing under India's Centre for Military Airworthiness and Certification is planned, but the Supreme Lite's first flight would establish only an initial step toward validating the Supreme Heavy's separate structural, aerodynamic and propulsion requirements. The FWD Supreme's proposed autonomy architecture combines onboard flight control, sensor processing, threat identification, and mission management without requiring a ground operator to control every manoeuvre. Its planned visual-odometry system would estimate the aircraft position from successive camera images when GPS is jammed, although the integration of an inertial navigation system and a method of correcting accumulated position errors would remain necessary. The Supreme Heavy is also intended to use satellite communications and secure aircraft-to-aircraft links to exchange positions, sensor information and task assignments.

Flying Wedge is cooperating with the Indian Institute of Science in Bengaluru on encryption, but has not established the system's communications range, bandwidth, latency or resistance to electronic warfare. The distinction between autonomous flight and autonomous combat is important: maintaining a flight path without human steering does not demonstrate reliable identification of hostile aircraft, authorization of weapon release, or engagement of moving targets under electronic attack. The operational concept, which Flying Wedge calls its Mobbing Doctrine, envisages 15 to 20 autonomous aircraft supporting one crewed fighter, with reconnaissance, electronic warfare, decoy and strike tasks distributed across the group. If all drones were Supreme Heavy variants carrying their maximum advertised payload, 15 units would collectively transport 5,250 kg of mission equipment or weapons, while 20 would carry 7,000 kg.

A group could potentially use reconnaissance aircraft to locate enemy radar emitters, decoys to provoke air defense responses and armed aircraft to attack selected sites, provided that its sensors and communications supported coordinated engagements. Flying Wedge has also proposed retaining combat capability after losing four or five aircraft: in a 20-aircraft formation, five losses would eliminate 25% of the force and up to 1,750 kg of its original payload capacity, leaving 15 aircraft available for reassignment. Still, the concept depends on automated task allocation, collision avoidance, and resilient communications, because a fighter pilot could not manually control 20 aircraft during combat. Flying Wedge targets a price around $3 to 4 million for a basic Supreme unmanned aircraft and no more than $5 million with additional weapons and sensors, compared with its $100 million conventional fighter benchmark.

Fifteen drones would therefore cost $45 to 75 million, while 20 would cost $60 to 100 million; purchasing 100 would require $300 to 500 million before weapons, maintenance, and infrastructure are included. These figures imply a 20- to 33-fold difference in aircraft purchase price, not equivalent combat capability or lifecycle cost. The company estimates that an investment of $100 million is necessary to develop the FWD Supreme, including $10 million for Lite, and has cited $7 million associated with the lighter-aircraft effort. Separately, Tracxn recorded $3.44 million in company funding across eight rounds through April 4, 2026. Tejaskanda confirmed that the Supreme had not received government funding and was seeking private investment, leaving the proposed prices dependent on additional investment, engineering results, and production volumes.

The programme's industrial objective is to develop the airframe, autonomous software and a substantial proportion of its equipment within India, rather than depend entirely on imported aircraft or flight control systems. Flying Wedge estimates domestic content at 90% for the Supreme Lite and 65% for the Supreme Heavy, potentially increasing to 80-85% for the Heavy if an Indian engine is adopted. DRDO's Manik engine is a candidate, although the company has not confirmed that its thrust, dimensions, fuel consumption, and integration requirements meet the Supreme Heavy's objectives. Through Operation Triple Seven, Flying Wedge is pursuing foreign industrial cooperation, including Portugal's Sketchpixel LDA, also known as Keydef, for simulation, AI integration, communications, and Kaalbhairav manufacturing.

Those programs demonstrate a broader product-development effort but do not establish that the heavier Supreme airframe, its propulsion system, or autonomous combat software are ready for production. Within India, the FWD Supreme would enter a field already occupied by DRDO's Ghatak unmanned combat aircraft and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited's CATS Warrior loyal wingman programs, both pursuing capabilities relevant to reconnaissance, strike, or cooperation with crewed fighters. The Ghatak's associated SWiFT flying-wing demonstrator completed its first flight on July 1, 2022, followed by an autonomous landing demonstration in December 2023, and on March 3, 2026, India's Defence Procurement Board recommended the acquisition of 60 units.

HAL's CATS Warrior, intended to accompany India's crewed fighters, including the Tejas, is still under development. International programs are further into testing. General Atomics' YFQ-42A first flew in August 2025, Anduril's YFQ-44A has conducted airborne weapons-related experimentation, and Australia's Boeing MQ-28 Ghost Bat had accumulated more than 150 test sorties by June 2026. Turkey's Bayraktar Kizilelma demonstrated a beyond-visual-range missile engagement in November 2025. These aircraft differ in weight, payload, and intended roles, but their flight and weapons trials establish capabilities that the FWD Supreme has still to demonstrate. Flying Wedge must still fly Lite, complete Heavy's design, validate its propulsion and autonomous coordination, and integrate weapons before the programme can progress toward military qualification or production.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, South Korea, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.
New U.S. M250 Machine Gun Mounted on Drone Fires at Ground Targets in Live-Fire Test
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
Israel Aerospace Industries and SIG SAUER have demonstrated the FIRE STORM 250 unmanned aircraft engaging targets with an M250 machine gun, marking a step toward giving ground forces their own persistent airborne surveillance and direct-fire capability. Announced by IAI on October 13, 2026, the live-fire test showed the reusable UAS detecting and tracking targets with an electro-optical sensor before engaging them through a stabilized remote weapon station, potentially shortening the sensor-to-shooter cycle and bringing controlled armed overwatch and suppressive fire closer to troops at the tactical edge.

IAI and SIG SAUER successfully tested the FIRE STORM 250 armed drone with an M250 machine gun, demonstrating a reusable airborne system that combines surveillance, target identification and direct fire support for ground forces (Picture Source: IAI)

Israel Aerospace Industries and SIG SAUER have advanced the concept of organic airborne fire support after completing a live-fire demonstration of the FIRE STORM 250 unmanned aircraft system equipped with an M250 machine gun. In an announcement published on October 13, 2026, IAI said the platform successfully combined airborne surveillance, target identification and controlled weapons employment in a simulated battlefield environment. The test is relevant not simply because a machine gun was fired from a UAS, but because FIRE STORM 250 is being developed as a reusable tactical platform capable of combining intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and direct kinetic effects within a single airborne node.

During the trial, FIRE STORM 250 hovered over the test area, detected and identified targets through its onboard electro-optical sensor and engaged them using the SIG SAUER MICROLIGHT Remote Controlled Weapon Station carrying the M250. IAI said the system fired in single-shot and semi-automatic modes from varying ranges and altitudes, while sensor imagery, target-tracking information and fire-control data were presented to the operator through an integrated engagement architecture. The system retains a human-in-the-loop configuration, with the operator maintaining authority over weapons release. The demonstration confirms successful integration of the aircraft, sensor, stabilization system, fire-control architecture and weapon under the tested conditions, although IAI has not disclosed dispersion figures, engagement ranges, target dimensions, hit probability or performance against moving targets.

Related Topic: SIG Sauer M250 LMG Advances Squad Lethality and Fire-Control Integration

The core concept is the compression of the sensor-to-shooter cycle. FIRE STORM 250 is designed to allow tactical formations to conduct persistent surveillance, identify potential threats and transition rapidly to controlled direct fire without relying on separate reconnaissance and strike platforms. IAI identifies Close Air Support, border security, suppressive fire and homeland security among the intended mission sets, alongside force protection, intelligence gathering, route overwatch, protection of strategic sites and special operations. In practical terms, the system could provide a localized form of organic airborne direct-fire support to maneuver elements while maintaining persistent observation over the same tactical sector. This represents a different employment model from conventional fixed-wing or rotary-wing CAS, placing the sensing and engagement capability much closer to troops operating at the tactical edge.

FIRE STORM 250 builds on IAI's wider APUS armed-VTOL architecture. IAI describes FIRE STORM, also identified as APUS MG, as a next-generation armed quadcopter designed to provide persistent airborne firepower directly to tactical formations, with long endurance, payload flexibility and heavy-lift capacity of up to 35 kg. Earlier in January 2026, IAI disclosed that an APUS 60 fitted with a weapon station had participated in demonstrations of an integrated border-protection architecture designed to shorten the kill chain between surveillance assets and available effectors. That earlier activity suggests the latest firing trial forms part of a broader maturation path rather than an isolated technology demonstration. In its FIRE STORM 250 configuration, IAI states that the system can remain airborne for up to three hours while carrying 200 rounds, with a complete combat-ready weight of 53 lb including the RCWS, M250 and ammunition.

The M250 is central to the system's feasibility because airborne weapons integration is governed by a demanding balance between weapon mass, ammunition load, recoil forces, stabilization requirements and aircraft endurance. The U.S. Army describes its standard M250 as a lightweight, belt-fed, select-fire 6.8×51 mm light machine gun equipped with a recoil-mitigation system, with the baseline weapon weighing approximately 13 lb. The weapon was developed under the Next Generation Squad Weapon program as the replacement for the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon within designated U.S. Army formations. On an unmanned VTOL platform, lower weapon mass and controlled recoil can directly influence hover stability, target tracking and the amount of payload available for sensors, ammunition and fuel. The exact airborne M250 configuration used on FIRE STORM 250, however, has not been fully detailed publicly, so specifications associated with the standard infantry weapon should not automatically be assumed to apply unchanged to the UAS installation.

The firing test also highlights the operational trade-offs that will shape FIRE STORM 250's value in a contested battlespace. IAI emphasizes the system's VTOL configuration, multi-fuel internal-combustion engine, field-refueling capability and ability to operate multiple aircraft simultaneously for persistent day-and-night surveillance. These features could reduce dependence on runways, charging infrastructure and larger aviation support elements. Future military evaluation would still need to examine factors not detailed in the announcement, including datalink resilience, navigation performance in GNSS-degraded conditions, effectiveness under electronic attack, acoustic and thermal signature, engagement of moving targets and survivability against counter-UAS systems. The October trial should consequently be viewed as an important weapons-integration milestone rather than evidence that every operational requirement for frontline deployment has already been validated.

FIRE STORM 250 demonstrates how tactical UAS development is moving beyond surveillance and one-way attack profiles toward reusable platforms capable of combining persistent ISR with operator-authorized direct fire. By integrating IAI's VTOL architecture with SIG SAUER's MICROLIGHT RCWS and M250, the system offers a potential means of placing surveillance and controlled kinetic capability directly within a maneuver formation's organic assets. IAI has not announced a customer, procurement contract or fielding schedule for FIRE STORM 250, leaving qualification testing and military evaluation as key indicators of its future trajectory. The next measure of the system will be whether its sensor-to-shooter architecture can deliver repeatable and accurate effects while maintaining command links, stabilization and survivability under the electronic-warfare and counter-UAS pressures expected on a modern battlefield.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
Dutch Nuclear-Capable F-35s Take Central Role in NATO’s Steadfast Noon Exercise
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
Dutch F-35A fighters certified for NATO’s nuclear mission are taking a central role in Steadfast Noon 2026, which began in Italy on 13 October with aircraft from 17 Allied nations, according to the Dutch Ministry of Defence. As the first European country to field the F-35 as a nuclear-certified Dual Capable Aircraft, the Netherlands is bringing fifth-generation stealth, survivability, and strike capability into NATO’s nuclear-sharing posture, marking a significant shift in how the Alliance prepares to sustain credible deterrence against increasingly sophisticated air defenses.

Dutch nuclear-certified F-35A fighter jets are participating in NATO’s Steadfast Noon 2026 exercise in Italy, reinforcing the Alliance’s nuclear deterrence readiness (Picture Source: U.S. Air Force)

NATO’s annual nuclear deterrence exercise is putting one of Europe’s most strategically important fighter capabilities back into the spotlight, with Dutch F-35As contributing to Steadfast Noon 2026. The exercise began in Italy on 13 October 2026, bringing together aircraft and personnel from 17 Allied nations to rehearse the procedures supporting NATO’s nuclear mission. For the Netherlands, the significance goes far beyond participating in another multinational air exercise: its F-35s are certified for both conventional and nuclear missions. The Dutch Ministry of Defence says the Netherlands is the first European country to achieve nuclear certification with this type of Dual Capable Aircraft.

The Dutch contribution marks a fundamental step in the modernization of NATO’s airborne nuclear deterrent. Since 1 June 2024, the F-35A has fully taken over the Netherlands’ NATO nuclear mission from the F-16 following an extensive testing and certification process. Volkel Air Base remains home to the Dutch dual-capable F-35 force, with one squadron assigned to the mission. The achievement made the Netherlands the first European NATO member to transition its nuclear role to the F-35 and, according to the U.S. Department of War, the second NATO Ally after the United States to operationally certify the F-35A for the Dual Capable Aircraft mission. This places the Royal Netherlands Air Force at the leading edge of NATO’s transition from legacy fourth-generation nuclear-capable fighters toward a fifth-generation deterrence force.

Related Topic: U.S. and Dutch F-35 Stealth Fighters Conduct Joint High-Tempo Operations to Strengthen NATO Combat Readiness

Nuclear-capable does not mean that Dutch F-35s are carrying nuclear weapons during Steadfast Noon. NATO says no live nuclear weapons are used in the exercise. Nor does nuclear sharing mean that the Netherlands possesses an independent nuclear arsenal. Under NATO’s nuclear-sharing arrangements, the United States retains absolute custody and control of its forward-deployed nuclear weapons in Europe, while selected Allies provide certified Dual Capable Aircraft, trained crews and supporting capabilities. If required in a conflict and politically authorized, those aircraft form part of the Alliance system designed to deliver nuclear weapons. Nuclear sharing is about sharing responsibility for deterrence rather than transferring ownership of nuclear weapons.

The F-35A adds an important new dimension to that system because the aircraft has been developed and certified to employ the U.S. B61-12 nuclear gravity bomb. During the F-35A’s nuclear design certification process, U.S. test aircraft released representative B61-12 test weapons under operationally realistic conditions. The U.S. Department of War has described the broader transition to the F-35 and B61-12 as strengthening the military effectiveness and credibility of NATO’s nuclear deterrent. Compared with older-generation platforms, the F-35 combines low-observable characteristics with advanced sensors, data fusion and networked operations, giving NATO a nuclear-capable aircraft designed to operate in increasingly sophisticated threat environments.

That is where the Netherlands increasingly acts as a force multiplier for NATO. The strategic value of the Dutch contribution cannot be measured simply by counting fighter aircraft. A relatively compact air force now fields a platform capable of conventional strike, air defence, intelligence gathering and information sharing while also supporting one of NATO’s most sensitive strategic missions. The F-35 can collect and distribute battlefield information across a wider force while its survivability complicates an adversary’s defensive planning. Nuclear certification adds another layer: Dutch aircraft and crews now contribute directly to a deterrence structure intended to convince a potential opponent that aggression against NATO could carry unacceptable consequences. In this sense, the Netherlands generates strategic effects significantly greater than the numerical size of its fighter fleet might suggest.

Steadfast Noon also demonstrates that credible nuclear deterrence involves far more than a nuclear bomb and the aircraft capable of delivering it. NATO’s nuclear posture depends on trained aircrews, secure command and control, intelligence, communications, conventional fighter support, air-to-air refuelling, surveillance and other Allied capabilities operating together. NATO notes that even Allies without Dual Capable Aircraft contribute through conventional support, planning, exercises and nuclear consultations. The participation of 17 countries in Steadfast Noon underlines the collective nature of the mission: a small number of specialized nuclear-capable aircraft sit within a much larger multinational military and political system designed to keep the deterrent credible.

The timing also carries strategic weight even though NATO stresses that Steadfast Noon is a long-planned and routine exercise that is neither linked to current world events nor directed against any specific country. Its purpose is to maintain readiness and verify the procedures behind what NATO describes as a safe, secure, effective and credible deterrent. For the Netherlands, participation with nuclear-certified F-35s demonstrates that its nuclear-sharing commitment is no longer based on a legacy F-16 capability but on one of NATO’s most advanced combat aircraft. The exercise consequently provides both practical training and a visible demonstration that the Alliance continues to invest in the credibility and survivability of its nuclear posture.

The Dutch role in Steadfast Noon 2026 illustrates a broader transformation taking place inside NATO. The Netherlands is not becoming an independent nuclear power; instead, it is becoming increasingly important to the credibility of the Alliance’s existing nuclear deterrent. As the first European country to operate a nuclear-certified F-35in the Dual Capable Aircraft role, it has become an early operational bridge between NATO’s legacy nuclear-sharing architecture and a new generation built around the F-35 and B61-12. By combining stealth, advanced sensors, conventional combat power and nuclear certification in a single platform, the Dutch F-35 force gives a relatively small NATO member an outsized strategic role, and offers a preview of how Europe’s airborne nuclear deterrence is likely to evolve in the years ahead.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
U.S. Army Expands Counter-Drone Defense With Combat-Proven Coyote Interceptors Against Drone Swarms
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
The U.S. Army is strengthening its defenses against hostile drones and coordinated swarms with a new $729 million procurement of components for Raytheon’s LIDS counter-unmanned aircraft system, combining KuRFS radars with Coyote interceptors. The system provides 360-degree threat detection and kinetic and non-kinetic interception capabilities, with Raytheon reporting hundreds of successful combat intercepts. The contracts also include Qatar and Jordan, marking the first international sales of both technologies.

The Raytheon LIDS (Low, slow, small, unmanned aircraft Integrated Defeat System) combines the KuRFS 360-degree surveillance radar with Coyote interceptors to detect, track, and defeat hostile drones and coordinated swarms. (Picture source: Raytheon)

The Low, slow, small, unmanned aircraft Integrated Defeat System (LIDS) protects military bases, critical infrastructure, and deployed forces from small unmanned aircraft, including threats launched in coordinated attacks. The procurement covers both fixed-site and mobile configurations, expanding the flexibility of a counter-drone capability U.S. forces already use in combat environments.

At the core of LIDS is Raytheon’s Ku-band Radio Frequency Sensor (KuRFS), a precision radar designed to detect and track small aerial threats across a 360-degree surveillance area. Its high-resolution sensing supports detecting and tracking low-flying drones with limited radar signatures, including aircraft operating near terrain, buildings, and other clutter sources. This enables operators to maintain situational awareness and provide targeting information for interception.

The Raytheon Coyote is a compact, ground-launched unmanned aerial interceptor developed specifically to defeat hostile drones. Its kinetic variants use onboard guidance and a warhead to intercept aerial targets that KuRFS detects and tracks, providing a dedicated means of engaging small unmanned aircraft. Unlike conventional surface-to-air missiles designed primarily against aircraft and larger aerial threats, Coyote is optimized for counter-drone missions, including engagements against small, maneuvering targets. This allows Army air defense units to counter drone threats without relying exclusively on more expensive conventional missiles.

The Coyote family also includes non-kinetic variants designed to neutralize unmanned aircraft without conventional explosive interception. These effectors provide additional engagement options depending on the type of drone, the surrounding operational environment, and the risk of collateral damage. Raytheon says Coyote interceptors have achieved hundreds of interceptions in combat, demonstrating the operational maturity of existing variants against real-world unmanned aircraft threats.

One of LIDS's principal operational advantages is its ability to integrate detection, tracking, command and control, and interception into a coordinated defensive architecture. This is particularly important against drone swarms, where multiple unmanned aircraft may approach from different directions within a short period. Unlike isolated drone attacks, coordinated threats can challenge surveillance coverage, engagement timelines, and available interceptor inventories.

The U.S. Army integrates LIDS with the Forward Area Air Defense Command and Control system, known as FAAD C2, which connects sensors and defensive weapons to support threat assessment and engagement coordination. This architecture allows operators to manage multiple aerial tracks and select available countermeasures, helping reduce reaction times against small drones that may provide only limited warning before reaching their targets.

The procurement includes fixed-site and mobile LIDS configurations intended for different operational requirements. Fixed installations provide persistent surveillance and protection around airfields, military bases, ammunition storage facilities, and other high-value locations. Mobile configurations extend counter-drone protection to deployed units and maneuvering formations, allowing air defense assets to reposition as battlefield conditions change.

The U.S. Army’s existing Mobile LIDS configuration combines surveillance, electronic warfare, and kinetic engagement equipment mounted on mine-resistant, ambush-protected vehicles. Its kinetic defeat vehicle incorporates KuRFS, Coyote interceptors, and a 30 mm automatic cannon, providing complementary means of engaging unmanned aircraft. This layered approach reduces reliance on a single weapon and lets defenders use different countermeasures based on the threat.

Raytheon is also developing improvements to the Coyote family intended to provide faster launch times, higher interceptor speeds, greater engagement ranges, and the ability to defeat targets at higher altitudes. These enhancements are designed to shorten the interval between detection and interception while extending the defended area. They could become particularly important against faster unmanned aircraft and coordinated attacks that compress the time available for defensive decisions.

The development effort includes the Coyote Block 2C+RM, an upgraded interceptor incorporating a new rocket motor, seeker, and warhead intended to improve performance against emerging aerial threats. Raytheon previously reported developmental testing of this configuration, including integration activities and launches using a tactical rocket motor. However, the upgraded interceptor remains under development, and Raytheon has not publicly disclosed detailed figures for its maximum speed, engagement range, altitude ceiling, or operational availability.

Raytheon has also demonstrated non-kinetic counter-swarm capabilities with its Coyote Block 3 variant, designed to defeat multiple unmanned aircraft without relying on conventional explosive interception. Its recoverable design could reduce the use of expendable interceptors during repeated engagements, although effectiveness and operating costs depend on conditions and the threat being confronted.

In its October 13, 2026 announcement, Raytheon said it is expanding production capacity and continuing to upgrade the Coyote family in response to growing demand for counter-drone defenses. Increasing production matters operationally because sustained attacks involving numerous inexpensive drones can quickly deplete defensive ammunition. Maintaining sufficient interceptor stocks is therefore essential to protect forces during prolonged operations, not isolated engagements.

The inclusion of Qatar and Jordan marks the first international sales of KuRFS and Coyote, extending access to U.S. counter-unmanned aircraft technologies in the Middle East. The acquisitions could improve protection for military installations and critical infrastructure while supporting closer defensive interoperability with U.S. forces in the region. Raytheon has not disclosed how many radars, launchers, or interceptors each customer received, delivery timelines, or how the $729 million contracts are financially distributed.

The expansion of LIDS reflects a broader shift in military air defense toward integrated, layered protection against increasingly numerous and affordable unmanned aircraft. Conventional surface-to-air missiles remain essential against higher-performance aerial threats, but using them against inexpensive drones can impose high costs on defending forces. Combining radar surveillance, electronic warfare, automatic cannons, and dedicated counter-drone interceptors provides more flexible engagement options and helps preserve higher-value air defense weapons.

For the U.S. Army, the latest LIDS procurement strengthens an established counter-drone capability while supporting the production capacity and technical improvements needed to respond to evolving aerial threats. By combining 360-degree detection, integrated engagement coordination, mobile and fixed-site protection, and combat-experienced Coyote interceptors, LIDS provides a more scalable defense against individual drones and coordinated attacks. Its longer-term effectiveness will depend on interceptor availability, continued technological upgrades, and the ability to sustain defensive operations against increasingly complex drone threats.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Alain Servaes – Chief Editor, Army Recognition Group
Alain Servaes is a former infantry non-commissioned officer and the founder of Army Recognition. With over 20 years in defense journalism, he provides expert analysis on military equipment, NATO operations, and the global defense industry.
U.S. F-16 Mixed Combat Loadout Reveals Evolving CENTCOM Air Warfare Strategy Over Middle East
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
A newly released image offers a rare and unusually detailed window into the U.S. Air Force’s evolving combat playbook over the Middle East, revealing an F-16 armed with a carefully tailored mix of air-to-air missiles, precision bombs, advanced targeting equipment, extended-range fuel tanks and a possible guided-rocket launcher, a configuration that exposes how CENTCOM is preparing individual fighters to shift rapidly between intercepting drones and aircraft and striking ground targets as threats emerge.

A combat-loaded U.S. Air Force F-16 flies over the Middle East carrying a mixed weapons configuration tailored for air defense, precision strike and potential counter-drone missions (Picture Source: U.S. CENTCOM)

A newly released U.S. Air Force image provides another unusually detailed look at how the F-16 Fighting Falcon is being armed for real-world operations across the Middle East. Published by the Defense Visual Information Distribution Service (DVIDS) on October 12, 2026, the photograph shows a combat-loaded F-16flying in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility on October 4, 2026, during operations supported by a KC-135 Stratotanker. The image stands out because the fighter appears equipped for a broader mission set, combining weapons that could allow it to shift between air defense, precision strike and counter-drone tasks during the same sortie.

Mixed F-16 Loadout Combines Air Defense, Precision Strike and Extended Endurance

Visual analysis indicates that the aircraft is most likely a U.S. Air Force F-16CM Viper, carrying a particularly diverse combination of weapons, sensors and fuel. The visible stores appear to include two AIM-120-series AMRAAM beyond-visual-range air-to-air missiles, assessed from their external appearance as potentially representing different C/D-series configurations, together with an AIM-9M-series Sidewinder and a newer AIM-9X-series missile for short-range engagements. Beneath one wing, a BRU-61/A smart pneumatic carriage appears loaded with four GBU-39/B Small Diameter Bombs, while two 370-gallon external fuel tanks increase mission endurance.

Related Topic: Lockheed Martin Tests Networked Legion Pods to Sharpen F-16 Passive Targeting in Radar-Denied Airspace

A LITENING Advanced Targeting Pod is visible beneath the aircraft, while the opposite wing appears to carry a seven-tube LAU-131-family launcher whose contents are not sufficiently visible for definitive identification, but which could be associated with AGR-20-series Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System II guided rockets. The exact missile and rocket subvariants are not identified in the official DVIDS caption, so they should remain visual assessments rather than confirmed designations. What is clear, however, is the architecture of the loadout: rather than maximizing one class of weapon, the F-16 distributes its available stations between air defense, precision attack, targeting, endurance and potentially lower-cost guided rockets.

The four GBU-39/Bs are particularly important because they demonstrate what could be described as weapons-station economy, one of the characteristics that continues to make the F-16 highly useful in modern combat. The U.S. Air Force describes the GBU-39/B as a 250-pound-class GPS/INS-guided precision weapon capable of engaging fixed targets from stand-off ranges exceeding 40 nautical miles. More importantly, four independently targetable weapons can be installed on a single smart carriage, allowing one hardpoint to generate several precision effects while leaving other stations available for air-to-air missiles, fuel tanks, sensors or additional weapons. This means the photographed F-16 is not simply carrying four bombs; it is compressing four precision-strike opportunities onto one station while preserving much of the aircraft's multirole capability.

In a theater where targets may include radar installations, command nodes, weapons-storage facilities, launch positions or other geographically dispersed military infrastructure, that combination gives a single fighter considerably more tactical choice after takeoff. The LITENING pod adds another important layer by providing electro-optical and infrared surveillance, target identification and coordinate-generation capabilities, although the GBU-39/B itself navigates autonomously after release using GPS/INS rather than requiring continuous laser designation.

Possible APKWS Role Highlights Growing Counter-Drone Requirements in CENTCOM

The apparent LAU-131-family launcher may provide an even more revealing clue about how the U.S. Air Force is adapting the F-16 to the changing Middle Eastern threat environment. If the pod is carrying AGR-20-series APKWS II rockets, its purpose could extend well beyond traditional air-to-ground attack. The U.S. Air Force demonstrated in 2019 that an F-16 could destroy an airborne drone using an AGR-20A laser-guided rocket, establishing the concept of employing a comparatively inexpensive precision rocket against aerial threats. That capability has since evolved significantly. In September 2025, the Air Force confirmed that the newer AGR-20F had been validated and field-tested for F-16 employment against enemy aircraft and other airborne targets, with the service specifically emphasizing its relevance against one-way attack drones and cruise missiles.

An official Air Force report noted that the weapon offers a dramatically different cost equation from conventional air-to-air missiles and that F-16 crews had been training with configurations combining LAU-131 launchers with AIM-120s and AIM-9s. This does not prove that the October aircraft carries AGR-20Fs, but if APKWS-derived rockets are present, the configuration could give the Viper a layered counter-air arsenal: AMRAAMs for longer-range or higher-performance threats, Sidewinders for shorter-range engagements, and guided rockets for lower-cost aerial targets where expenditure of a sophisticated missile may be unnecessary. In a region where large numbers of inexpensive drones can impose disproportionate costs on defenders, that ability to match the price and performance of the weapon to the threat has become an increasingly important part of air-defense planning.

The photograph also fits an increasingly visible pattern in U.S. F-16operations across the CENTCOM theater. Previous Army Recognition analysisof U.S. Air Force imagery published during 2026 identified F-16CMs operating with different combinations of Small Diameter Bombs, rocket launchers, targeting equipment, electronic-support sensors, air-to-air missiles and external fuel. Another configuration photographed in August carried what appeared to be eight GBU-39/Bs on two BRU-61/A carriages, significantly increasing precision-strike density while still retaining targeting, fuel and air-to-air capabilities. Compared with that configuration, the latest October aircraft appears to trade half of that potential SDB capacity for a rocket launcher, producing a more diversified weapons package.

Viewed together, these images suggest something more significant than a succession of unusual loadouts: they point toward a mission-tailored CENTCOM employment model in which the same F-16 platform can be configured differently according to the anticipated threat mix. One sortie may prioritize precision-strike mass, another suppression or targeting support, and another a broader balance between counter-air, ground attack and counter-drone tasks. The enduring value of the F-16 lies not in a single definitive weapons configuration, but in the ease with which commanders can exchange weapon density for weapon diversity without changing aircraft type.

KC-135 Support Extends the F-16's Value Beyond Its Weapons Load

The KC-135 Stratotanker dimension of the DVIDS release is equally important because the effectiveness of such a multirole loadout depends not only on what the F-16 carries but on how long it can remain available to use it. Two 370-gallon external tanks already increase the fighter's endurance, but aerial refueling creates what can effectively be described as additional airborne decision time. A tanker-supported F-16 can remain in a patrol area while the threat picture develops, escort other aircraft, respond to an emerging drone or missile raid, wait for time-sensitive targets to appear or be redirected toward an entirely different task without immediately returning to base. That combination of adaptable weapons and tanker-supported persistence helps explain why the F-16 remains strategically important even as the U.S. Air Force fields the stealthier F-35 and other advanced systems.

The service has continued investing heavily in the Viper, with a modernization program covering 608 Block 40 and Block 50 aircraft and as many as 22 modifications, including improvements intended to keep the fourth-generation fighter effective against evolving threats. Rather than competing directly with fifth-generation aircraft in every mission, the F-16 supplies something complementary: mature logistics, large deployable numbers, broad weapons compatibility and the ability to generate sustained combat mass at relatively high tempo. In CENTCOM, those characteristics allow advanced assets to be concentrated where their unique capabilities are most necessary while F-16s continue performing air defense, strike, escort, suppression-support and counter-UAS missions across the wider theater.

A Mission-Tailored Loadout Shows the Viper's Continuing Value Across CENTCOM

The latest DVIDS imagery reveals more than the combat load of another F-16 operating over the Middle East. It illustrates why the Viper remains difficult to replace as a day-to-day instrument of U.S. airpower. Four Small Diameter Bombs concentrated on one station provide precision-strike capacity without consuming the entire aircraft's weapons architecture; AMRAAMs and Sidewinders preserve layered air-defense capability; the apparent rocket launcher could introduce a more economical response to drones and other lower-end threats; external tanks and KC-135 support increase persistence; and the LITENING pod gives the pilot the ability to find, identify and support engagement of targets as the mission develops.

Combined with previous CENTCOM imagery showing substantially different F-16 configurations, the October aircraft reinforces a broader conclusion: the Viper's strength is no longer simply its ability to perform many missions, but its ability to be rapidly configured around whichever combination of missions the theater demands. In a Middle Eastern battlespace increasingly characterized by drones, cruise missiles, aircraft, mobile targets and dispersed military infrastructure, that mission elasticity ensures that the F-16 remains not merely an aging fourth-generation fighter, but a highly relevant component of American combat airpower.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
Philippines could buy more S-70i Black Hawk helicopters from Poland, official says
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
Polish presidential spokesperson Rafał Leśkiewicz confirmed that there is a strong chance that the Philippines could place a follow-up order for additional PZL Mielec S-70i Black Hawk utility helicopters following bilateral talks between President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and President Karol Nawrocki in Manila. The high-level discussions build upon the completion of a 32-aircraft delivery contract that established the Philippine Air Force as the largest operator of the Polish-built variant globally. Both administrations evaluated expanded industrial cooperation opportunities, including potential local assembly and maintenance framework agreements.

The Sikorsky S-70i Black Hawk is a Polish-built export variant derived from the UH-60M, retaining its T700-GE-701D engines while using an export-oriented digital avionics suite and customer-specific communications, defensive equipment, and mission systems. (Picture source: Philippine Air Force)

On October 8, 2026, Polish presidential spokesperson Rafał Leśkiewicz indicated that there is a strong chance that the Philippines could purchase additional S-70i Black Hawk helicopters from PZL Mielec following talks between Presidents Karol Nawrocki and Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The prospect emerges only 43 days after the Philippine Air Force accepted its final seven S-70is from a 32-helicopter contract on August 26, completing a procurement program involving 48 deliveries under two agreements signed in 2019 and 2022, worth $865.4 million. The Philippines currently possesses 47 S-70is following the loss of one helicopter in June 2021, making it the world's largest operator of the Polish-built Black Hawk variant. Bilateral discussions also covered potential helicopter co-production following a Philippine delegation's visit to PZL Mielec. A further order would increase the Philippine Air Force's existing medium-lift helicopter inventory, although no additional quantity, contract value, delivery schedule, or manufacturing agreement has been confirmed.

Manila ordered its first 16 S-70is in June 2019 for PHP14.87 billion ($241.4 million), with deliveries completed by December 2021. A February 2022 follow-on agreement covered 32 helicopters for $624 million (PHP31.8 billion), increasing the average contractual expenditure from $15.09 million to $19.50 million per aircraft, a 29.3% rise including associated equipment and services. Under the second agreement, five helicopters arrived in June 2024, another five in December 2024, and the remaining 22 were delivered by August 2026, including seven accepted at Villamor Air Base in Pasay City on August 26. The 205th Tactical Helicopter Wing consequently operates 15 S-70i helicopters from the first acquisition batch and 32 from the second. Philippine Black Hawks conduct troop transport, jungle operations, casualty evacuation, and resupply, alongside firefighting on Homonhon Island in April 2026 and earthquake damage assessment in Sarangani in June.

Related topic:US approves the sale of four UH-60L Black Hawk helicopters to Argentina for $140 million

Manufactured in Mielec, Poland, the S-70i shares its airframe architecture and T700-GE-701D engines with the U.S. Army's UH-60M Black Hawk, with each engine producing 1,262 kW continuously and 1,471 kW for 2.5 minutes under one-engine-inoperative contingency conditions. The S-70i measures 19.76 m overall, with a 15.26 m fuselage, 16.36 m main rotor, 3.35 m tail rotor, and 5.13 m height. Empty weight is 5,376 kg against a 9,979 kg maximum takeoff weight, leaving 4,603 kg before accounting for fuel, personnel, and equipment. Maximum cruise speed reaches 296 km/h, never-exceed speed reaches 357 km/h, and maximum climb rate reaches 17.8 m/s under specified conditions. Its 1,362-liter baseline fuel capacity provides a maximum range of 578 km without reserves, extendable to 2,150 to 2,300 km using 1,514 liters of optional internal fuel or up to 3,028 liters in external ferry tanks, depending on configuration.

The helicopter accommodates two pilots, two cabin crew members, and 12 soldiers in a 3.84 m-long cabin with 11.2 m³ of volume and sliding doors with a 1.7 m opening. Removable seating permits cargo transport or medical evacuation, including three-stretcher arrangements or dedicated six-stretcher interiors. Its 4,082 kg cargo hook allows underslung equipment transport, subject to fuel, altitude, temperature, and aircraft weight restrictions. Armed configurations can accommodate M134 7.62 mm miniguns, M3M and GAU-19 12.7 mm machine guns, and four external weapon stations carrying up to 76 Hydra 70 rockets or 16 AGM-114 Hellfire missiles, with guided 70 mm rockets also available. The Philippines received eight M134D-H 7.62 mm Gatling guns on January 23, 2026, for defensive armament during troop insertion and extraction, but has not confirmed fleet-wide integration of external missile or rocket launchers.

The S-70i's cockpit incorporates four 10-inch multifunction displays, dual flight-management systems, GPS/inertial navigation, digital maps, and HF/VHF/UHF communications. Its Integrated Vehicle Health Monitoring System supports fault diagnosis, while redundant hydraulic and electrical systems, armored pilot seats, ballistic-tolerant components, crash-resistant fuel tanks, and energy-absorbing landing gear address equipment failures and certain combat damage. On October 8, 2026, Lockheed Martin signed a Direct Commercial Sale contract with the Philippine Department of National Defense for an S-70i Full Flight Simulator, Virtual Maintenance Trainer, and associated courseware. The flight simulator reproduces the helicopter's operating characteristics through a digital twin, while the maintenance trainer models hydraulics, avionics, and other subsystems for troubleshooting exercises. The agreement includes spare parts and sustainment support through 2032, while Philippine pilots continue training at the U.S.-based Sikorsky Training Academy pending establishment of domestic facilities.

PZL Mielec began the production of the S-70i in 2009, followed by the first flight in July 2010, and operates under the ownership of Sikorsky, itself a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin. The Philippine 32-helicopter contract became its largest single Black Hawk order, while 48 cumulative deliveries made Manila the largest customer for the Polish-built S-70i, not the wider UH-60/S-70 family. The factory completed its 700th Black Hawk cabin in October 2025, reflecting cabin manufacturing rather than 700 completed S-70i helicopters. Philippine representatives subsequently examined potential co-production, which could involve final assembly, component manufacturing, or maintenance, each requiring different tooling, certification, and investment. Additional helicopters would permit more simultaneous island reinforcement, casualty evacuation, and resupply missions, but sustained operations would still depend on secure landing zones, forward fuel supplies, maintenance teams, available crews, and suppression of nearby air defenses.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, South Korea, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.
Raytheon’s Coyote Block 2C+RM Tests Sharpen U.S. Counter-Drone Edge With Rocket-Powered Upgrade
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
Raytheon has successfully flight-tested its new Coyote Block 2C+RM counter-drone interceptor, with RTX announcing on October 12, 2026, that three developmental tests have validated a fully rocket-powered configuration designed to respond faster to increasingly sophisticated unmanned threats. By replacing the jet-powered sustainment system of current Block 2-series Coyotes with a solid rocket motor, the upgrade promises higher velocity, improved range-related performance, and stronger terminal engagement capability, potentially giving U.S. forces more time and reach to destroy hostile drones before they can threaten troops, bases, and critical assets.

Raytheon has successfully tested its new Coyote Block 2C+RM, an all-rocket-powered counter-drone interceptor designed for faster launches, higher-speed engagements and improved performance against increasingly sophisticated unmanned aerial threats (Picture Source: Raytheon)

The rapidly evolving drone threat is forcing counter-UAS systems to deliver greater speed, shorter reaction times and more capable terminal effects. On October 12, 2026, RTX announced that its Raytheon business had successfully completed three developmental tests of the new Coyote Block 2C+RM, advancing the interceptor from concept to flight testing in only 15 months. The Raytheon-funded program is being developed to support an urgent joint U.S. military requirement to counter increasingly sophisticated unmanned aerial threats, making the achievement strategically significant for the future of American layered air defense.

At the center of the upgrade is a significant evolution in propulsion. RTX officially confirmed that the Coyote Block 2C+RM incorporates a tactical rocket motor designed to deliver faster launch and flight performance. According to remarks by Raytheon Land & Air Defense Systems President Tom Laliberty, the new configuration replaces the jet-powered sustainment architecture used by current Coyote Block 2-series interceptors with a solid rocket motor, effectively transforming the 2C+RM into an all-rocket-powered interceptor. The change is intended to increase velocity, shorten engagement timelines and strengthen the interceptor’s ability to respond to increasingly demanding unmanned aerial threats.

This propulsion architecture represents an important shift toward higher-velocity engagement performance while preserving the proven foundations of the Coyote family. Raytheon has not disclosed specific speed or range figures, maintaining appropriate operational sensitivity around the interceptor’s detailed performance envelope. Laliberty has nevertheless indicated that the propulsion change delivers meaningful improvements in velocity and overall engagement performance, while the upgraded configuration is designed to strengthen the interceptor’s effectiveness during the critical terminal phase of an engagement.

Related Topic: U.S. Approves $2.1B FS-LIDS Counter-Drone System Sale to UAE Under Emergency to Protect Key Sites

The propulsion upgrade is being accompanied by a new seeker and warhead designed to defeat all classes of current and emerging drone threats. This combination is particularly important because contemporary counter-UAS operations are no longer defined exclusively by small, slow commercial-type aircraft. Military forces increasingly face faster, more maneuverable and more sophisticated unmanned systems that can compress defensive reaction windows and potentially arrive in coordinated or successive attacks. Higher interceptor velocity can have value beyond simply reaching a target faster: it can compress the engagement timeline, increase the time available for follow-on defensive actions and improve the ability of an air-defense unit to prosecute multiple threats in rapid succession. RTX specifically stated that the tactical rocket motor is intended to improve threat-engagement times and enable faster successive shots.

The three tests also carry significance at the system-of-systems level. According to RTX, the campaign included confirmation of initial integration with the current counter-drone architecture, indicating that Raytheon is pursuing increased performance without abandoning the infrastructure surrounding the existing Coyote family. Current Coyote effectors already operate alongside Raytheon’s Ku-band Radio Frequency Sensor, or KuRFS, within the U.S. Army’s Low, slow, small-unmanned aircraft Integrated Defeat System, or LIDS. The combination provides detection, precision tracking and kinetic defeat capability within an integrated counter-UAS architecture. Maintaining a common Coyote backbone while introducing more capable propulsion, sensing and terminal-effect technologies could allow the U.S. military to strengthen its defensive capacity without building an entirely separate engagement architecture around the new interceptor.

This approach could become particularly valuable as the United States confronts the economics and operational complexity of mass drone warfare. The defensive challenge is not simply to intercept one aircraft, but to maintain sufficient engagement capacity, response speed and magazine efficiency when multiple unmanned threats approach a defended force or installation. Coyote’s combat-proven heritage is important: RTX states that existing variants have already intercepted hundreds of drones, giving Raytheon an operationally informed foundation on which to develop the 2C+RM. Rather than pursuing an entirely new weapon from the ground up, Raytheon is applying an accelerated upgrade philosophy to a system already connected to U.S. counter-drone operations, a development model that can help American forces adapt more rapidly as adversary UAS technology continues to evolve.

Raytheon’s successful Coyote Block 2C+RM test campaign represents a notable step in strengthening the United States’ ability to stay ahead of an increasingly demanding unmanned-aircraft threat environment. By combining an all-rocket-powered propulsion configuration with a new seeker, enhanced warhead and initial compatibility with the existing counter-drone architecture, the program is aimed directly at the speed, complexity and compressed engagement timelines associated with emerging UAS threats. Just as importantly, advancing the concept to developmental testing in only 15 months demonstrates Raytheon’s capacity to rapidly evolve combat-proven technology in response to urgent U.S. military requirements. As additional testing matures the design, Coyote Block 2C+RM has the potential to reinforce a critical layer of America’s counter-UAS architecture and provide U.S. service members with a faster and more capable kinetic response to the next generation of aerial threats.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
U.S. and European Firms Expand Air Defense Against Shahed Drones With Autonomous Interceptors
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
European missile manufacturer MBDA and U.S.-based Fortem Technologies are expanding their partnership to integrate autonomous drone interceptors into allied air defense networks, offering new options to counter Shahed-type attack drones and other unmanned aerial threats. The agreement combines destructive interception and drone capture capabilities, allowing military forces to adapt their defensive response while reducing reliance on conventional surface-to-air missiles.

The FireThorn autonomous quadcopter interceptor, based on Fortem Technologies’ Ground-Launched Air-to-Air Munition (G-LAAM) and equipped with an MBDA warhead, is displayed at MBDA’s booth during AUSA 2026 in Washington, D.C. ( Picture Source: Army Recognition)

The cooperation responds to growing demand for counter-drone systems capable of addressing increasingly diverse aerial threats without relying exclusively on conventional surface-to-air missiles. By integrating autonomous interceptors into command-and-control architectures already in service, the two companies aim to provide military operators with additional engagement options for protecting forward positions, military installations, and critical infrastructure.

According to announcements published by Fortem Technologies and MBDA on October 12, the agreement extends a technical collaboration established in 2024, when Fortem's DroneHunter interceptor was integrated into MBDA's Sky Warden counter-unmanned aircraft system (C-UAS) architecture. Under the expanded partnership, MBDA will offer DroneHunter to its military customers while jointly marketing FireThorn, an interceptor specifically developed to engage hostile unmanned aircraft. Both solutions are intended for integration into existing air defense networks, with international sales remaining subject to applicable export authorizations.

FireThorn provides the partnership's principal hard-kill capability. The interceptor combines Fortem's Ground-Launched Air-to-Air Munitions (G-LAAM) airframe with an MBDA-supplied NATO-approved warhead. Its design incorporates a high-speed autonomous aircraft using radar guidance to intercept hostile drones, providing a destructive engagement option against targets requiring direct neutralization rather than capture. The companies specifically identify Iranian-designed Shahed attack drones and their Russian Geran variants, as well as Orlan reconnaissance drones, among the threats the system is intended to engage.

More AUSA 2026 News from Army Recognition

The combination of radar guidance and an explosive warhead distinguishes FireThorn from Fortem's existing capture-based interception systems. Rather than requiring direct human piloting during the interception phase, the system is designed to conduct engagements autonomously through its onboard guidance capabilities. This approach could allow operators to respond to incoming hostile drones while reducing the workload associated with controlling individual interceptions. However, the manufacturers have not specified FireThorn's maximum engagement range, operating altitude, interception speed, or warhead weight in their October announcement.

DroneHunter addresses a different requirement through an autonomous interception mechanism using a net. Instead of destroying an approaching aircraft with an explosive charge, the interceptor physically captures its target, reducing the risk of collateral damage associated with conventional kinetic engagements. This capability is particularly relevant near civilian infrastructure, populated areas, and installations containing sensitive equipment. Recovering captured aircraft can also facilitate technical exploitation by allowing specialists to examine onboard electronic components, navigation systems, and other recovered equipment.

Fortem's SkyDome family of systems combines TrueView radar sensors, command-and-control software, and autonomous DroneHunter interceptors to detect, track, and engage unauthorized aircraft. Integrating these capabilities into MBDA's Sky Warden architecture creates opportunities to coordinate different defeat mechanisms within a common operational framework. Sky Warden follows a layered counter-drone approach, allowing operators to select engagement methods according to the detected threat and the environment surrounding the protected area.

From a tactical and operational perspective, the partnership provides armed forces with additional flexibility when protecting military bases, ammunition depots, command posts, and deployed units. FireThorn offers a destructive interception option against attack drones, while DroneHunter provides an alternative when limiting collateral damage is a priority. These complementary capabilities could allow commanders to allocate defensive resources more selectively, reserving conventional surface-to-air missiles for threats requiring larger engagement envelopes. Their effectiveness against coordinated attacks will nevertheless depend on sensor coverage, target identification, available interceptor stocks, and integration with existing command networks.

The agreement also allows Fortem to expand its access to European and allied defense markets through MBDA's established customer relationships and air defense portfolio. Fortem reports operational deployments of its technologies in Ukraine, the Middle East, and East Asia, although it has not disclosed engagement statistics for FireThorn. The jointly developed interceptor is being displayed at MBDA's booth during AUSA 2026, held in Washington from October 12 to 14, allowing military delegations to examine the system alongside the companies' other counter-drone solutions.

The expansion of this cooperation comes as NATO members and European governments reassess their air defense requirements following the extensive use of Shahed-type attack drones and reconnaissance UAVs in Ukraine. These threats have exposed the difficulties of maintaining continuous protection against relatively inexpensive aircraft when defensive operations rely primarily on conventional missile inventories. By combining American autonomous interception technology with European missile expertise, MBDA and Fortem are pursuing a more diversified defensive architecture. For European and allied forces, the central objective is to reinforce short-range air defense while preserving higher-value interceptors for combat aircraft, cruise missiles, and other threats requiring greater engagement capabilities.

Written By Erwan Halna du Fretay - Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group
Erwan Halna du Fretay holds a Master’s degree in International Relations and has experience studying conflicts and global arms transfers. His research interests include security and strategic studies, particularly the dynamics of the defense industry, the evolution of military technologies, and the strategic transformation of armed forces.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News
South Korea Advances FA-50 Light Combat Aircraft Toward Collaborative Combat with KAI’s AAP Drone Wingman
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
South Korea is moving closer to a new model of air combat in which a crewed fighter commands autonomous drones as part of a distributed strike formation, after Korea Aerospace Industries flew its jet-powered AAP alongside an FA-50 in close formation on October 8, 2026. Announced by KAI on October 12, the demonstration opens a path toward turning the FA-50 into an airborne command node able to extend its sensors, electronic warfare, deception and eventually strike capabilities through multiple unmanned wingmen.

KAI’s AAP drone flew in close formation with an FA-50 fighter, marking a key step toward South Korea’s AI-enabled manned-unmanned air combat capability (Picture Source: KAI)

South Korea has taken a new step toward manned-unmanned air combat by successfully flying Korea Aerospace Industries’ Adaptable Aerial Platform (AAP) alongside an FA-50 light combat aircraft. During the demonstration on October 8, 2026, the two aircraft maintained close formation in actual flight, moving KAI’s wingman concept from development toward increasingly complex airborne experimentation. KAI announced the achievement on October 12, with Yonhap News Agency and Newsis reporting the results as part of the company’s wider push toward a next-generation manned-unmanned combat architecture.

At the center of the program is the AAP, or Adaptable Aerial Platform, a 150-kilogram-class high-speed unmanned aircraft KAI has been developing through company-funded investment since 2024. Powered by a jet engine, the platform measures about 3.1 meters long and 2.2 meters wide and has a maximum stated speed of 790 km/h. Following its first flight in October 2025, KAI has continued expanding the aircraft’s flight-test program while applying its internally developed KAiLOT artificial-intelligence pilot to advance autonomous flight. The AAP is intended to eventually operate alongside crewed fighters and other unmanned systems for missions including reconnaissance, electronic jamming, deception and strike. Its relatively compact size also gives KAI a practical route for testing autonomy, formation keeping, datalinks and mission-management technologies before transferring them into larger and more capable unmanned combat platforms. In this sense, AAP can be viewed not only as a drone, but as a flying technology laboratory for South Korea’s future air-combat ecosystem.

Related Topic: WDS 2026: KAI Positions FA-50 Light Combat Aircraft with AAP Drones in Close Formation Teaming Concept

The latest flight also places the FA-50 light combat aircraft in an increasingly interesting role. Over waters south of Goheung in South Jeolla Province, the FA-50 and AAP flew for about 20 minutes at roughly 7,000 feet, maintaining a separation of only 9 to 30 meters while travelling at 360 km/h. KAI plans to use the collected data to develop AI-enabled multi-aircraft formation technology and later demonstrate flight in which the FA-50 controls the AAP’s mission. If that capability matures, the FA-50 could evolve beyond its conventional light-fighter function and become a command node inside a distributed combat formation. A crewed FA-50 cooperating with multiple unmanned aircraft could potentially project sensors, electronic-warfare effects, decoys or weapons across a wider area than the fighter could cover alone. The October demonstration did not yet prove an operational loyal-wingman capability involving autonomous targeting, weapons employment or tactical control of multiple drones, but it establishes another layer in the development sequence needed to reach that level.

For South Korea, such capabilities offer clear geostrategic advantages across the Korean Peninsula and the wider Indo-Pacific. The region combines long maritime approaches, contested airspace, sophisticated air-defense networks and a growing requirement for persistent intelligence and distributed combat power. Future unmanned wingmen could allow South Korean fighters to send sensors, jammers or decoys deeper into dangerous areas while keeping pilots farther from hostile surface-to-air missiles and enemy aircraft. On the Korean Peninsula, unmanned platforms could eventually support surveillance, electronic warfare, deception and other high-risk missions where exposing a crewed aircraft would carry greater operational cost. The concept also addresses the challenge of combat mass. Advanced fighters and highly trained pilots cannot be expanded without limit, while lower-cost unmanned aircraft could increase the number of sensors and mission systems available during a conflict. A force combining crewed fighters with autonomous teammates could give the Republic of Korea Air Force more options for dispersing combat power, complicating an opponent’s targeting process and sustaining operations across multiple axes.

KAI’s approach also points toward a broader South Korean sovereign air-combat architecture rather than a stand-alone drone project. The company has already presented concepts linking the KF-21, unmanned combat aircraft, AAP and satellite-based capabilities as part of its next-generation air-combat system, while an FA-50 connected with AAP was displayed at MSPO 2026 in Poland to demonstrate the fighter’s potential growth path through manned-unmanned teaming. That creates an industrial advantage for South Korea: KAI can develop the crewed aircraft, unmanned platforms and integration architecture around an expanding domestic aerospace base instead of treating each element as an isolated acquisition. It could also open a longer-term export opportunity. The FA-50 already has an established international customer base, including Poland’s 48-aircraft program, and a mature, export-approved manned-unmanned package could eventually give operators a path toward collaborative air combat without immediately moving to a large fleet of heavier fighters. Such an offering could strengthen the FA-50’s position from an affordable light combat aircraft into a platform with an expandable role inside future networked air forces.

KAI’s latest flight shows a disciplined development path built around testing real hardware, collecting flight data and progressively increasing the complexity of human-machine cooperation. The next milestones will be even more demanding: mission control of AAP from the FA-50, AI-supported multi-aircraft formation flight and eventually cooperation involving several unmanned systems. KAI intends to use these technologies as building blocks for its future unmanned combat aircraft, or MUCCA, while the wider architecture could ultimately connect platforms such as the FA-50 and KF-21 with autonomous aircraft, sensors and space-based communications. If KAI can carry this roadmap from close formation flying into genuine mission-level cooperation, South Korea will have created far more than a drone wingman demonstrator. It will have established the foundations of a domestically controlled collaborative combat-air system capable of strengthening deterrence on the Korean Peninsula, extending South Korean air power across the Indo-Pacific and reinforcing KAI’s position as one of Asia’s most ambitious aerospace manufacturers.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
Indonesia could receive its first Chinese J-10 fighters by April 2027
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
Indonesia could receive its first Chinese Chengdu J-10 fighter jets within six months, placing their expected arrival in April 2027, although Indonesian Air Force Chief Air Marshal Mohamad Tonny Harjono declined to confirm the delivery date. The prospective acquisition forms part of Indonesia's defense modernization effort to secure its maritime approaches across thousands of islands. This initiative complements existing purchases of Dassault Rafale and Turkish KAAN aircraft while broadening Jakarta's non-aligned military procurement posture.

Indonesia could receive its first Chengdu J-10 fighter jets from China by April 2027, according to Republika, although the Indonesian Air Force has yet to confirm the delivery schedule, aircraft quantity, or variant. (Picture source: Weibo/单手搓核弹)

On October 5, 2026, Indonesian news outlet Republika indicated that Indonesia could receive its first Chinese Chengdu J-10CE fighter jets within six months, placing their expected arrival in April 2027, after Indonesian Air Force Chief Air Marshal Mohamad Tonny Harjono declined to confirm a delivery date. Questioned at the TNI headquarters in Cilangkap, East Jakarta, Harjono responded only, "Just wait," without specifying how many fighters would arrive. Indonesia has been considering the acquisition since September 2025, with potential quantities of 12, 24, or 42 aircraft, although neither the final purchase quantity nor the contract value has been confirmed or publicly disclosed. The choice between newly manufactured J-10CE fighters equipped with AESA radar and PL-15E long-range missiles and second-hand J-10Bs also remains unresolved.

If completed, the acquisition would make Indonesia the first Southeast Asian operator of the Chinese fighter and could increase its combined J-10, Rafale, and Kaan procurement pipeline to 132 jets, excluding its continuing participation in South Korea's KF-21 program. Indonesia's J-10 possible procurement became public on September 18, 2025, when Defense Ministry information chief Brigadier General Frega Wenas Inkiriwang confirmed that the Indonesian Air Force was evaluating the Chinese fighter. On October 15, Defense Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin indicated that J-10s would soon operate over Jakarta, following President Prabowo Subianto's September visit to Beijing. Finance Minister Purbaya Yudhi Sadewa subsequently referred to $9 billion in approved defense funding, but could not confirm whether the allocation specifically covered the Chinese aircraft.

Related topic:China delivers first J-10CE fighters to Uzbekistan to challenge Russian influence in Central Asia

By October 31, Sjafrie acknowledged that the acquisition had not been finalized, while Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman Zhang Xiaogang had emphasized Beijing's controlled approach to military exports. In May 2026, Brigadier General Rico Ricardo Sirait rejected claims that Indonesia had finalized a 42-aircraft agreement worth $9 billion. Even though the final quantities remain open to debate, if we assume an initial delivery of six aircraft, as was the case for Pakistan and Uzbekistan, it would represent 50% of a 12-aircraft purchase, 25% of a 24-aircraft purchase, or 14.3% of a 42-aircraft purchase, with substantially different implications for squadron formation and pilot conversion. The J-10CE belongs to the latest export generation of Chengdu's single-engine, canard-delta J-10 fighter family, which first flew in 1998 and subsequently evolved through the J-10A, J-10B, and J-10C variants.

The J-10C measures 16.9 m in length, 9.8 m in wingspan, and 5.7 m in height, with a 37 m² wing area and 11 external weapons stations. Published figures include an empty weight of 9,750 kg, a maximum takeoff weight of 19,227 kg, and an internal fuel capacity of 4,950 liters, equivalent to 3,860 kg. Two 1,600-liter external tanks and one 800-liter tank can also increase total fuel capacity to 8,950 liters, although carrying three external tanks changes aerodynamic drag. Later Chinese configurations use the WS-10B afterburning turbofan engine, with quoted thrust of 89.17 kN without afterburner and 144 kN with afterburner, whereas earlier aircraft employed Russian AL-31FNs. The aircraft's published maximum speed is Mach 1.8, with an 18,000 m service ceiling, 300 m/s maximum climb rate, and +9/-3 g maneuvering limits.

For Indonesia, the distinction between the J-10C's 1,850 km flight range and 4,600 km ferry range matters because a fighter deployed from Sulawesi toward distant maritime approaches must retain sufficient fuel for interception, combat maneuvering, and recovery, rather than merely reaching the designated patrol area. The most consequential difference between the J-10B and J-10CE is the combination of sensors, missile compatibility, and remaining service life. The J-10B employs a passive electronically scanned array radar, an infrared search-and-track sensor, a diverterless supersonic inlet, and an earlier avionics architecture, while the J-10CE introduces an AESA radar and compatibility with the PL-15E beyond-visual-range missile, with claimed radar detection distances for the J-10C of 220 to 250 km against a 3 m² target, tracking of 30 targets, and simultaneous engagement of six.

The PL-15E missile, for its part, combines active radar guidance with midcourse datalink updates, with a 145 km maximum range displayed at Zhuhai in 2021 and a separate Chinese claim exceeding 200 km in January 2026, without establishing equivalent effective engagement distances. The broader J-10 family could also carry PL-10 short-range missiles, KD-88 air-to-surface missiles, YJ-91 anti-radiation missiles, and YJ-83K anti-ship missiles. Indonesia has confirmed neither PL-15E quantities nor the weapons package, making the difference between new J-10CEs and refurbished J-10Bs central to assessing its future air combat capabilities. Pakistan's J-10CE fleet could provide a comparison for delivery rates and combat employment. Islamabad announced an initial acquisition of 25 aircraft in December 2021, with an option for 11 additional fighters, subsequently bringing the program to 36 units.

The first six J-10CEs arrived at PAF Base Minhas on March 4, 2022, while deliveries had reached 20 aircraft by May 2025, equivalent to 55.6% of the planned fleet. During the May 7, 2025, India-Pakistan air engagements, several Pakistani J-10CEs armed with PL-15E missiles participated in long-range air combat against Indian fighters. Pakistan claimed five Indian aircraft losses, including three Rafales, one Su-30MKI, and one MiG-29, while two U.S. officials assessed that at least two Indian aircraft had been shot down, including a Rafale. Pakistani officials placed one engagement at 200 km, although the distance between opposing aircraft does not independently establish the missile launch distance or interception geometry. The combat also demonstrated the relevance of coordinated fighter radar, airborne surveillance, datalinks, and PL-15-series missiles, without establishing that the J-10CE would achieve identical results against different aircraft, defensive systems, or operating conditions.

The financial difference between acquiring new J-10CEs and refurbished J-10Bs is also substantial. Using indicative J-10C prices of $40 million to $50 million, 12 aircraft would cost between $480 million and $600 million, 24 would cost $960 million to $1.2 billion, and 42 would cost $1.68 billion to $2.10 billion before accounting for weapons, simulators, spare engines, maintenance equipment, and infrastructure. The $9 billion defense funding figure discussed by Finance Minister Purbaya Yudhi Sadewa in October 2025 would equal $214.3 million per aircraft if assigned entirely to 42 J-10s; however, Purbaya could not establish that the full amount concerned the fighter acquisition, and the Defense Ministry subsequently rejected claims of a finalized $9 billion agreement covering 42 J-10CEs.

A separate financing arrangement allocated up to $3.1 billion to Indonesia in foreign loans for three Chinese defense acquisitions, comprising up to $1.6 billion for J-10B fighters, $1 billion for CM-302 coastal anti-ship missiles, and a remaining $500 million allocation associated with Type 22 fast attack craft. China's manufacturing capacity introduces another uncertainty for newly built aircraft, as AVIC Chengdu's simultaneous J-20 production prevents establishing the number of J-10CEs available for Indonesian delivery in early 2027. The distribution of the prospective J-10 fleet would be particularly important because Indonesia's air defense responsibilities extend across an archipelago of more than 17,000 islands and widely separated maritime approaches.

Meetings on October 20 and 28, 2025, examined the expansion of Haluoleo Air Base in Southeast Sulawesi and Sultan Hasanuddin Air Base in South Sulawesi, including runways, hangars, quick reaction alert facilities, radars, and command-and-control equipment. Haluoleo plans also included land development in Bombana and a new squadron, although J-10 imagery appeared during the October 2025 planning process without confirming an eventual basing assignment. A 42-aircraft inventory could mathematically support three 14-aircraft units or two 21-aircraft units; at 70% mission-capable availability, fleets of 12, 24, and 42 aircraft would provide eight, 17, and 29 available fighters. For Indonesia's dispersed maritime approaches, the operational difference would depend on how many aircraft can sustain two-fighter interception alerts at separate bases while retaining sufficient pilots, missiles, fuel, and maintenance reserves.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, South Korea, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.
Airbus U740 Valkyrie Makes First European Flight on Path to Operational Combat Drone Capability by 2029
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
Airbus has flown the U740-Valkyrie in Europe for the first time, announcing the milestone on 12 October 2026 as it pushes toward a combat-ready Collaborative Combat Aircraft capability by 2029. Reaching speeds of up to Mach 0.8 after a rocket-assisted take-off, the aircraft demonstrated in-flight mission changes and opened the way for testing Airbus’ MARS autonomous mission system, a key step toward fielding crewed-uncrewed combat teams while keeping critical mission software, data and system control in European hands.

Airbus has flown the U740-Valkyrie in Europe for the first time, opening a new flight-test phase aimed at integrating sovereign European autonomous mission systems for a combat-ready CCA capability by 2029 (Picture Source: Airbus)

Europe’s drive to field autonomous combat aviation at operationally relevant speed has crossed a significant threshold with the first European flight of the Airbus U740-Valkyrie. Airbus announced the milestone on 12 October 2026, positioning it as a major step toward a combat-ready Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) capability by 2029 for Germany and other European armed forces. Beyond the flight itself, the programme combines a flight-proven American air vehicle with a sovereign European mission-system architecture intended to accelerate crewed-uncrewed combat capability while retaining European control over critical software, mission applications, data and system hardware.

U740-Valkyrie Advances From Integration to European Flight Testing

Conducted at a test facility in Northern Europe, the U740-Valkyrie’s maiden European flight achieved all stated objectives, including a runway-independent rocket-assisted take-off, manoeuvres across different altitude and speed regimes up to Mach 0.8, and in-flight mission adjustments. The sortie establishes an important baseline for the European flight-test campaign, but it should not be interpreted as full validation of the aircraft’s future autonomous combat architecture. Airbus states that the flight now paves the way for more sophisticated testing involving its Multi-platform Autonomous Reconfigurable and Secure, or MARS, mission system, making the distinction between air-vehicle validation and mission-system maturation operationally significant.

Related Topics: U.S. Marine Corps Selects Northrop Grumman to Operationalize Valkyrie Loyal Wingman Combat Drone

The U740-Valkyrie provides Airbus with a comparatively mature air vehicle on which to build its European CCA proposition. Measuring 9.1 metres in length with an 8.2-metre wingspan, the aircraft has a maximum take-off weight of approximately three tonnes, a range exceeding 5,000 kilometres and a service ceiling of 45,000 feet. Its configuration incorporates an internal weapons bay and external underwing payload stations, while the aircraft is designed to operate autonomously or under the command of crewed combat aircraft such as the Eurofighter. The underlying Kratos Valkyrie first flew in the United States in 2019, allowing Airbus to avoid part of the schedule and development risk associated with a clean-sheet airframe and instead concentrate European engineering effort on missionisation, autonomy, connectivity and crewed-uncrewed teaming.

That programme logic is central to Airbus and Kratos’ stated objective of delivering a combat-ready CCA by 2029 to address requirements identified by the German and potentially other European armed forces. Rather than developing an entirely new aircraft from the ground up, the partners are effectively combining a proven flying platform with a European-controlled combat system in an effort to shorten the path toward operational capability. In practical terms, the U740 could provide additional range, firepower and survivability to crewed formations while accepting missions in threat environments where exposing a pilot would carry greater operational risk.

MARS Places European Sovereignty at the Mission-System Level

At the centre of the concept is Airbus’ MARS mission system, described by the company as the U740-Valkyrie’s European mission-system layer. MARS is designed to provide control over software, mission applications, data and associated system hardware while using AI-enhanced software to support autonomous mission execution and the coordination of multiple collaborative platforms. Airbus also emphasises a strict command hierarchy in which a human remains “on the loop,” pointing toward supervisory human control over increasingly autonomous mission execution rather than conventional remote piloting. Critical decisions, according to Airbus, are intended to remain governed by established rules of engagement together with applicable ethical and legal standards.

The sovereignty implications are particularly significant for Europe. The U740 is based on the US-developed Kratos Valkyrie and should not be characterised as a wholly indigenous European combat aircraft. Instead, Airbus is placing sovereignty at the mission-system and operational-control level, creating a layered model in which a mature foreign-origin air vehicle is combined with European-controlled software, mission data and command architecture. That approach could allow European air forces to balance urgency with greater operational autonomy while avoiding the timelines associated with developing every element of the platform domestically.

The aircraft’s rail-launch capability, alongside conventional runway operations, could also support future force dispersal and air-base resilience in a contested environment, although these remain prospective operational advantages rather than capabilities validated by the maiden flight. Within Airbus’ wider roadmap, the U740 is also positioned as a foundational step toward broader collaborative combat aviation, including future Eurofighter teaming and the larger U760 Ravenstorm planned for the early 2030s.

The first European flight of the U740-Valkyrie represents more than an aviation milestone. It demonstrates Airbus and Kratos’ attempt to compress the path from experimentation to credible combat capability by combining a proven air vehicle with a sovereign European mission-system layer at a time when European air forces are seeking greater combat mass, survivability and freedom of action. The decisive milestones now lie ahead: progressively more complex MARS-equipped flight testing, validation of autonomous mission functions, secure crewed-uncrewed cooperation and eventual operational integration with the Eurofighter. If Airbus and Kratos sustain their stated 2029 objective, the U740 could become one of Europe’s earliest operational bridges from traditional fighter-centric air power toward distributed, software-defined and collaboratively autonomous combat aviation.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
Morocco expands drone strike capabilities with DS-16 and P-31 precision weapons from UAE's EDGE Group
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
The Royal Moroccan Air Force (RMAF) has signed a formal contract with the UAE defense conglomerate Edge Group to procure and integrate precision-guided munitions across its unmanned combat aerial vehicle fleet. Concluded during the Marrakech Air Show 2026, the agreement introduces advanced strike capabilities to modernize Morocco's military hardware. The integration targets enhanced operational effectiveness and tactical precision for strategic defense and surveillance missions.

The DS-16 is a precision-guided glide bomb carrying a 12 kg warhead with a maximum range of 15 km, while the P-31 is a heavier precision-guided bomb based on the Mk 81, designed to strike targets at ranges of up to 10 km when launched from drones. (Picture source: Edge)

On October 9, 2026, Morocco signed a contract with the UAE's Edge Group to purchase the Desert Sting 16 (DS-16) guided-glide weapon and Thunder P-31 precision-guided bomb to equip the combat drones of the Royal Moroccan Air Force (RMAF). Concluded during the Marrakech Air Show 2026, the agreement includes ammunition deliveries, aircraft modifications, weapon control software, integration, and long-term support. Manufactured by Edge subsidiary Halcon, the DS-16 weighs 23 kg, carries a 12 kg warhead, and has a maximum range of 15 km, while the Thunder P-31 converts a Mk 81 bomb into a guided weapon weighing 140 kg with a 10 km range when released from unmanned aircraft. Both employ GNSS-assisted inertial navigation and optional semi-active laser guidance, with an accuracy of 10 m and 3 m circular error probable (CEP), respectively. The contract concerns a Moroccan fleet including at least 19 Bayraktar TB2s, Chinese Wing Loongs, and heavier Bayraktar Akincis, but its value, ammunition quantities, recipient aircraft, and delivery schedule remain undisclosed.

The Desert Sting 16 (DS-16) measures 1,000 mm in length, 129 mm in diameter, and 323 mm across its widest section, with its warhead representing 52.2% of its total mass. It supports impact and height-of-burst detonation, while its 15 km range corresponds to a release at 9,144 m altitude at 220 knots calibrated airspeed, equivalent to 407 km/h. Logically, a Moroccan drone releasing the weapon at a lower altitude or speed cannot be assumed to achieve that distance. Halcon's dedicated Quad Rack carries four DS-16 weapons and weighs 45 kg, producing a 137 kg assembly measuring 1,880 × 435 × 200 mm and incorporating MIL-STD-1760 electrical connections. The Thunder P-31, for its part, weighs 140 kg, including a 110 kg bomb-body component, and has a maximum specified release altitude of 12,192 m. Its range increases from 10 km when released by unmanned aircraft to 20 km from faster, higher-altitude aircraft, with a separate 27 km maximum under different release conditions. The complete P-31 is 6.09 times heavier than the DS-16, consequently providing different options for each sortie.

Related topic:UAE defense group EDGE launches EDGE Europe in France to anchor global expansion

Morocco's combat drone acquisitions began expanding in 2020 with three or four Wing Loong I UCAVs reportedly transferred from the UAE, each offering a 200 kg payload and 20-hour endurance. In 2021, Morocco ordered 13 Turkish Bayraktar TB2 drones for a reported $70 million, followed by six more, bringing identifiable acquisitions to 19. The TB2 has a 700 kg maximum takeoff weight, four weapon stations, a 150 kg payload, and an endurance exceeding 20 hours. Morocco subsequently acquired the Wing Loong II, which has a 4,200 kg maximum takeoff weight, 480 kg payload, and 32-hour endurance, although its Moroccan fleet size remains unknown. The heavier Bayraktar Akinci followed under a 2023 procurement arrangement, with deliveries beginning in February 2025 and aircraft present at Ben Guerir's Sixth Air Base by June 2026. One inventory identifies three ordered aircraft. With a 6,000 kg maximum takeoff weight, 1,500 kg payload, and endurance exceeding 24 hours, the Akinci carries ten times the TB2's nominal payload and 3.125 times that of Wing Loong II.

Edge's earlier cooperation with Baykar could provide a starting point for integrating the Emirati weapons into Moroccan drones. On January 17, 2024, the companies agreed to integrate the DS-16 onto the TB2, and the weapon has subsequently been integrated for UAE-operated drones. A May 2026 agreement extended their cooperation to Al Tariq guided bombs for the Akinci, but Thunder-series integration onto a combat drone has not previously been confirmed. Four DS-16 weapons weigh 92 kg, or 61.3% of the TB2's 150 kg payload, increasing to 137 kg and 91.3% with the Quad Rack. One P-31 would consume 93.3% of that payload, compared with 9.3% aboard the Akinci, making the heavier aircraft a more plausible candidate. China's Wing Loong I and II can accommodate 140 kg within their aggregate payload limits, but their individual hardpoint capacities and software compatibility remain unverified. Aircraft-specific carriage, separation, and release certification will determine which configurations Morocco can actually operate.

Morocco's other unmanned aircraft include three reported IAI Herons, four Elbit Hermes 900s, and three second-hand EADS Harfang aircraft, primarily intended for long-endurance reconnaissance. Their inclusion in the Emirati weapons integration program has not been established. Morocco has also acquired BlueBird WanderB and ThunderB surveillance drones and pursued the SpyX loitering munition, which has a 2.5 kg warhead, 50 km operational reach, and 90 to 120 minutes of endurance. Unlike a DS-16 released by a reusable aircraft, the SpyX is itself expended during an attack. Following Moroccan testing in 2024, technicians received training in Israel in November 2025 for a proposed SpyX manufacturing operation at Benslimane, near Casablanca, although production quantities remain unknown. An October 2026 agreement with Harmattan AI separately envisages Moroccan manufacturing of autonomous drones intended for missions reaching 2,000 km, a future capability rather than an established operational inventory.

Morocco is also expanding the industrial infrastructure needed to manufacture and maintain military equipment. Law 10-20 established a framework for private defense production, while designated industrial areas cover 75 hectares at Nouaceur and 600 hectares at Sidi Yahya, totalling 675 hectares. Seven industrial land agreements were announced during Marrakech Air Show 2026. On October 9, Edge signed a separate memorandum concerning potential Moroccan production of Caracal firearms and Powertech aircraft engines. Powertech's P145i is a six-cylinder, 1.8-litre, 145 hp two-stroke engine with a 5 kW generator and a 1,000-hour overhaul interval; its turbojet portfolio includes 400 N, 1,000 N, 1,500 N, and 5,500 N designs. Morocco's aerospace industry already comprises 160 companies, 25,000 employees, and $3 billion in annual exports, with a $5 billion objective within three years. However, the memorandum specifies neither a selected engine nor an Edge factory, investment amount, or local DS-16/P-31 production arrangement.

Edge's broader African expansion includes Angola's €1 billion naval modernization contract signed in February 2023, involving three 71 m BR71 MK II Combattante corvettes and six HT-100 Naval unmanned helicopters. The first corvette, the NRA Ekuikui II, was launched at Cherbourg on March 4, 2026, with deliveries of the three ships scheduled for October 2026, April 2027, and October 2027. The six unmanned helicopters completed factory acceptance trials in Switzerland between August 24 and 28, 2026, with two allocated to each corvette for maritime surveillance. Edge also signed a letter of intent concerning Angolan border security, while a potential $300 million Nigerian defense equipment agreement remained under negotiation in July 2026. In Morocco, the group is considering local manufacturing, joint development, and incorporating Moroccan suppliers into its international supply chain serving more than 91 countries.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, South Korea, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.
U.S. Army Turns AH-64E Apache Guardians Into Drone Hunters Guided by Ground-Based AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel Radar
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
U.S. Army AH-64E Apache Guardian attack helicopters have demonstrated a new way to hunt drones, destroying three aerial targets after being guided by an AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel air-defense radar during Operation Skyfall II in Germany on October 6, 2026, according to details released by the Army on October 11. By allowing the Sentinel to detect threats at longer range and cue the Apaches into firing position, the test turned attack helicopters into networked counter-UAS shooters and demonstrated a potentially powerful option for NATO forces facing growing numbers of low-altitude drones: combining ground-based radar coverage with the Apache’s mobility and firepower to intercept threats before they reach troops and critical assets.

U.S. Army AH-64E Apache Guardian attack helicopters destroyed three target drones in Germany using tracking data from an AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel air defense radar during Operation Skyfall II (Picture Source: U.S. Army/ RTX)

The U.S. Armyhas demonstrated a new employment concept in which AH-64E Apache Guardian attack helicopters operate as airborne counter-UAS shooters cued by a ground-based air-defense network. The live-fire event took place on October 6, 2026, at Germany’s Grafenwoehr Training Area, where Apache crews destroyed three MQM-170 Outlaw target drones after receiving tracking information generated by an AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel radar. According to an official U.S. Army announcement published on October 11, Operation Skyfall II was designed to advance connectivity and interoperability between Army air-defense formations and combat aviation, creating additional defensive fire options against increasingly complex low-altitude unmanned threats.

Sentinel-to-Apache Network Creates a New Counter-UAS Kill Chain

Operation Skyfall II brought together air defenders from the 5th Battalion, 4th Air Defense Artillery Regiment, 52nd Air Defense Artillery Brigade, and aviators from the 2nd Battalion, 159th Aviation Regiment, 12th Combat Aviation Brigade. Rather than requiring an Apache crew to independently search a large volume of airspace with its organic sensors, the AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel established the initial track and provided continuous low-altitude alerting, tracking and queuing information. The air-defense tactical operations center then relayed the target’s position in time and space to the Apache crews, allowing them to maneuver toward the threat, acquire it and execute the engagement. The U.S. Army specifically noted that Sentinel can detect threats at greater distance and provide earlier warning than the Apache’s onboard sensors, improving both engagement opportunities and aircraft survivability. Army acquisition documentation describes the AN/MPQ-64A3 Sentinel as a three-dimensional X-band, 360-degree phased-array radar with a 75-kilometer instrumented range, although the Army’s Skyfall II announcement does not identify the specific Sentinel subvariant employed during the exercise.

Related Topic: U.S. Tests Apache Helicopter’s New Role with Uncrewed Systems for Extended Sensing and Effects Delivery

The significance extends well beyond connecting a radar to an attack helicopter. External cueing changes the Apache’s counter-UAS task from conducting a broad-area aerial search into a more focused interception and terminal-acquisition problem. Sentinel can establish and maintain the initial air track while the helicopter uses its mobility to position for engagement, potentially reducing the time crews must spend searching with organic sensors and compressing the wider sensor-to-shooter sequence. Importantly, Skyfall II should not be interpreted as demonstrating an autonomous Sentinel-to-Apache fire-control handoff. The Army describes a human-in-the-loop architecture in which air defenders detect and track the MQM-170, the tactical operations center maintains situational awareness and relays targeting information, and the Apache crew conducts the final acquisition and attack. All three Outlaw drones engaged by Apache crews were destroyed. This makes command-and-control integration and the movement of usable track data across different Army formations as significant as the physical intercept itself.

AH-64E Evolves Into a Networked Drone Hunter for Europe

The exercise also demonstrated how the AH-64E Apache Guardian’s weapons, sensors, mobility and digital architecture can be adapted to counter-UAS operations without converting the aircraft into a dedicated air-defense platform. U.S. Army imagery from Skyfall II shows an Apache firing its 30 mm chain gun while the Sentinel radar tracks the aerial target. The AH-64E carries the M230-series 30 mm automatic cannon and can also employ guided missiles and 70 mm rockets, giving crews access to multiple potential effectors depending on the target and engagement conditions. The Army confirmed three drone kills during Skyfall II but did not publish a weapon-by-weapon account identifying which munition destroyed each MQM-170. The imagery confirms 30 mm gun employment during the exercise, but it does not establish that all three targets were destroyed by the cannon. The broader technical significance lies in exploiting an attack helicopter already designed for increasingly networked operations. The AH-64E Version 6 configuration, for example, incorporates Link 16 communications capable of merging information from multiple networks into a wider operational picture, illustrating how modern Apache development has increasingly emphasized connectivity alongside lethality.

Skyfall II also marks an important progression from the first Operation Skyfall conducted in March 2026. During that earlier event, the 12th Combat Aviation Brigade demonstrated for the first time in the European theater that the AH-64E could serve as a viable counter-UAS platform and engage drones in air-to-air combat. Army aviators acknowledged at the time that such engagements represented a new mission profile for many Apache pilots and required development of new tactics, techniques and procedures. Skyfall II pushed the concept further by integrating ground-based detection, tactical command and control, external targeting information and repeated successful drone engagements into a single distributed kill chain. The evolution is especially relevant to NATO’s eastern flank. U.S. Army analysis of lessons from the Russia-Ukraine war has identified Russian small UAS as a persistent threat and highlighted how drone proliferation can compress tactical decision cycles to seconds. The MQM-170 should not be treated as a direct surrogate for every Russian reconnaissance drone, FPV system, loitering munition or one-way attack aircraft, but the exercise addresses the same broader operational challenge: detecting and defeating low-altitude unmanned threats quickly enough to protect maneuver forces and critical assets.

The concept also offers a potentially important expansion of counter-UAS magazine depth and shooter availability. An AH-64E able to receive targeting information from an external air-defense network gives commanders another mobile effector alongside dedicated short-range air-defense systems, electronic warfare capabilities, kinetic interceptors and other counter-UAS weapons. That does not mean the Apache replaces SHORAD. Its value is additive: ground-based radar can maintain surveillance while aviation assets reinforce a threatened sector, pursue a moving air target or contribute another engagement option when dedicated air-defense resources are committed elsewhere. Separating the sensor from the shooter also creates geographic flexibility because the Apache does not need to remain collocated with the radar generating the track. Such employment would still depend on communications resilience, airspace control, aircraft availability, ammunition expenditure, target classification and the survivability of rotary-wing aircraft within the adversary’s air-defense envelope. In a dense drone environment, those constraints will determine when using an Apache is operationally advantageous compared with other available effectors.

Operation Skyfall II shows that the U.S. Army is no longer examining the AH-64E only as an attack helicopter capable of independently shooting down drones. It is testing the Apache as a network-accessible airborne effector inside a wider layered air-defense architecture, where the best-positioned sensor can provide information to a separate platform carrying the weapon. By linking Sentinel surveillance, an air-defense tactical operations center and AH-64E crews into a common engagement sequence, the Army demonstrated a repeatable process that successfully destroyed three unmanned targets while continuing to refine the associated tactics, techniques and procedures. For U.S. and NATO forces facing an increasingly drone-dense European battlespace, the larger implication is not that the Apache becomes a substitute air-defense system, but that existing combat aviation can become another highly mobile shooter within an integrated counter-UAS network. If those data-sharing procedures and engagement concepts can be standardized across formations and allied forces, the approach could considerably broaden the number of sensors and effectors available to defend NATO forces against the evolving unmanned threat.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
U.S. B-2 Stealth Bomber Emerges From Major Overhaul With Restored Low-Observable Strike Capability
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
The U.S. Air Force has returned the B-2Spirit of Kitty Hawk to frontline service with its stealth performance renewed, restoring a scarce penetrating-strike asset able to carry conventional or nuclear weapons through some of the world’s most heavily defended airspace. The bomber arrived at Whiteman Air Force Base on October 7, 2026, after an extensive overhaul that the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center says restored critical low-observable surfaces and structural components, reinforcing America’s ability to hold high-value targets at risk where conventional aircraft could face prohibitive air-defense threats.

The U.S. Air Force’s B-2 Spirit of Kitty Hawk has returned to Whiteman Air Force Base after extensive depot maintenance restored critical structural components and low-observable features needed for stealth penetration missions (Picture Source: U.S. Air Force)

America’s B-2 Spirit fleet has moved another critical penetrating-strike asset through a major sustainment milestone following an extensive depot-level overhaul of the Spirit of Kitty Hawk. The aircraft returned to Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, on October 7, 2026, after completing scheduled programmed depot maintenance at Air Force Plant 42 in Palmdale, California. According to the U.S. Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, the work addressed key structural and low-observable requirements on one of America’s most strategically important combat aircraft.

The maintenance effort went considerably deeper than routine servicing. Under the direction of the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center’s B-2 Program Office, the recurring depot cycle managed by Northrop Grumman included detailed inspections, heavy structural repairs, restoration of low-observable coatings and maintenance of blade seals. The Spirit of Kitty Hawk also received a replacement hot trailing edge, an assembly designed to withstand the demanding thermal and acoustic environment generated by the bomber’s four engines. The scale of this work illustrates why programmed depot maintenance remains essential to preserving both structural integrity and the specialized characteristics that allow the B-2 to remain an effective penetrating bomber.

Related Topic: U.S. B-2 Stealth Bomber Refuelling Mission Highlights Australia’s Role in Indo-Pacific Deterrence

The restoration of the bomber’s low-observable surfaces is particularly significant. Stealth performance is not simply a product of the B-2’s distinctive flying-wing geometry; maintaining its specialized materials, coatings, seals and external surfaces is fundamental to controlling the signatures that make the aircraft difficult to detect, track and engage. The Air Force has previously emphasized that without this level of depot restoration, the B-2 would progressively lose part of its low-observable advantage and become more vulnerable to sophisticated radar and air-defense systems. Returning those surfaces to the required standard helps preserve the combat capability and survivability for which the B-2 was designed.

The overhaul also demonstrated the depth and responsiveness of the American B-2 sustainment enterprise. Depot inspections identified unplanned maintenance requirements, yet the team kept the process moving through a strategic component transfer from an incoming aircraft and the on-site manufacture of an additional replacement part. That combination of engineering expertise, parts management and industrial flexibility highlights Northrop Grumman’s central role in sustaining the highly specialized bomber it originally developed. Working alongside the Air Force, the company has accumulated decades of knowledge covering the B-2’s complex structure, low-observable technologies and unique maintenance requirements, expertise that remains critical to keeping one of the world’s most advanced combat aircraft viable.

For U.S. strategic planners, every B-2 returned from programmed depot maintenance matters because an aircraft undergoing deep maintenance cannot simultaneously support operational tasking, training or deterrence requirements. Following its depot return, the Spirit of Kitty Hawk is set to move into the 509th Bomb Wing’s modification line for additional low-observable and communications improvements. The sequence reflects a broader American approach: sustain and modernize the B-2 aggressively rather than allow its capability to decline during the transition to its successor. With Whiteman-based B-2s able to conduct exceptionally long-range missions from the continental United States, aircraft availability remains directly relevant to conventional global strike and strategic deterrence.

That requirement becomes even more important as the Air Force introduces Northrop Grumman’s B-21 Raider. The B-21 continues progressing through flight testing and toward operational fielding as the United States expands production capacity for its next-generation stealth bomber. In February 2026, the Department of the Air Force announced an agreement with Northrop Grumman to increase annual B-21 production capacity by 25 percent, while preparations continue for aircraft to arrive at Ellsworth Air Force Base. Until the Raider is fielded in sufficient numbers, preserving the B-2provides the United States with an essential bridge between today’s penetrating-strike requirement and the larger, more advanced stealth-bomber force planned for the future.

The return of the Spirit of Kitty Hawk represents far more than another aircraft completing scheduled maintenance. It demonstrates how the United States is protecting a scarce and strategically valuable penetrating-strike capability while methodically preparing the next generation of American airpower. By addressing structural requirements, restoring low-observable surfaces and preparing the bomber for further upgrades, the Air Force and Northrop Grumman are helping keep the B-2 credible against increasingly sophisticated threats. Northrop Grumman’s role in sustaining the B-2 while simultaneously producing the B-21 also underscores the depth of America’s aerospace industrial base, helping ensure the United States retains a formidable stealth-strike option throughout the transition to the Raider era.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
South Korea Demonstrates First Indigenous Hypersonic Glide Vehicle in Landmark Test
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
South Korea has taken a major step toward an independent hypersonic strike capability after successfully conducting the first flight test of its domestically developed Hypersonic Glide Vehicle (HGV), observed by President Lee Jae Myung on October 8, 2026, according to the Presidential Office. The vehicle successfully separated from its booster, maneuvered vertically and horizontally at hypersonic speed, and accurately reached its designated target, demonstrating the thermal protection, guidance, control, and low-altitude maneuverability needed to penetrate increasingly sophisticated missile defenses and strengthen South Korea’s strategic deterrence

South Korea successfully flight-tested its first indigenous hypersonic glide vehicle, demonstrating booster separation, low-altitude maneuvering, guidance control and precision strike capabilities (Picture Source: South Korea’s Presidential Office)

South Korea has crossed an important technological threshold in its drive to develop an independent next-generation strategic strike capability with the successful first test of an indigenous Hypersonic Glide Vehicle (HGV). President Lee Jae Myung personally observed the test on October 8, 2026, as Seoul demonstrated technologies intended to reinforce its ability to respond to an increasingly sophisticated regional missile environment. According to South Korea’s Presidential Office, supported by reporting from Yonhap News Agency and national broadcaster KBS, the test validated several of the most demanding technologies required for controlled hypersonic glide flight. The achievement is significant not only for the weapon program itself, but also for South Korea’s broader effort to strengthen sovereign defense capabilities through domestically developed advanced technologies.

Related Topic: China Developed a Hypersonic Glide Vehicle Capable of Launching Air-to-Air Missiles at Extreme Range

The HGV is being researched and developed with South Korean technology and follows a different flight concept from a conventional ballistic missile. A booster accelerates the system toward the upper atmosphere before the glide vehicle separates and descends into a lower-altitude hypersonic flight profile, where it can alter its trajectory rather than remain on a largely predictable ballistic path. During the inaugural test, the vehicle reached its planned altitude, successfully separated from its booster and completed its intended flight under hypersonic conditions. The Presidential Office said the test was specifically intended to verify ultra-high-temperature thermal protection materials, guidance and control technologies, and irregular maneuverability at low altitude. Following separation, the vehicle conducted both vertical and horizontal trajectory changes before accurately reaching its designated target point. The demonstration represents more than high-speed flight: it indicates that South Korea successfully integrated separation, thermal protection, guidance, control, maneuvering and terminal accuracy within a single indigenous HGV flight test.

Beyond the individual missile, the test carries considerable importance for South Korea’s defense-industrial autonomy. Hypersonic glide vehicles must operate in severe aerodynamic and thermal conditions while maintaining sufficient control to follow a planned trajectory, making the integration of heat-resistant materials, guidance and maneuvering technologies a demanding engineering challenge. President Lee emphasized after the test that national security should be secured through South Korea’s own strength and pledged government support for the continued development and operational deployment of advanced weapon systems. Yonhap reported that the launch took place from a barge at a test center operated by the Agency for Defense Development in Taean, while the Presidential Office did not publicly identify the location. The official briefing did, however, state that President Lee asked before the launch whether the use of a barge was related to safety. The reported barge launch should consequently be treated as part of the test configuration and not as evidence that South Korea has selected a sea-based operational deployment concept for the future HGV.

From an operational and regional perspective, a mature indigenous HGV could eventually provide the Republic of Korea with another nationally controlled element within its expanding conventional deterrence architecture. Unlike a conventional ballistic trajectory, a maneuvering hypersonic glide vehicle can change its flight path after separation, potentially making trajectory prediction and defensive planning more complex. This characteristic is especially relevant on the Korean Peninsula, where geographical distances are comparatively short and missile-warning timelines can be compressed. North Korea has continued to pursue its own hypersonic missile technologies, including a missile launch only days before the South Korean test, adding further significance to Seoul’s development of advanced indigenous capabilities. South Korea has nevertheless presented its HGV primarily in the context of strengthening deterrence and protecting national security. The actual effectiveness of the vehicle against specific missile-defense architectures cannot be determined from the information released after the test, and Seoul has not disclosed its maximum velocity, operational range, warhead configuration, dimensions or intended operational launcher.

The test also highlights an important distinction between technological achievement and operational capability. A successful inaugural integrated flight does not by itself demonstrate production maturity, combat reliability or readiness for deployment, and additional development and repeated testing can be expected before the system becomes an operational strategic asset. What South Korea has now publicly demonstrated is nonetheless substantial: an indigenous glide vehicle successfully reached its required altitude, separated from its booster, maintained planned flight under hypersonic conditions, maneuvered vertically and horizontally at lower altitude and accurately reached its designated target. President Lee subsequently inspected the Hyunmoo-5 high-power surface-to-surface missile, an officially acknowledged sequence that places the HGV development within a broader South Korean emphasis on increasingly diverse indigenous conventional deterrent capabilities. Rather than relying on a single strategic strike system, Seoul is progressively building a portfolio of domestically developed technologies intended to strengthen its ability to protect national security and maintain peace and stability.

South Korea’s first successful indigenous Hypersonic Glide Vehicle test represents a major technology-validation milestone rather than the unveiling of a finished operational weapon. The successful boost-and-separation sequence, controlled hypersonic glide, multidirectional maneuvering and accurate target impact establish an important foundation for the program’s next development phase, while key characteristics, including range, maximum speed, payload, launcher architecture and deployment schedule, remain undisclosed.

For South Korea, the achievement reinforces the country’s growing ability to develop some of the most technologically demanding elements of modern strategic weapon systems through its own defense research base. Regionally, an operational HGV could eventually broaden Seoul’s conventional deterrence options and complicate an adversary’s strategic calculations, but its ultimate military impact will depend on further testing and the configuration South Korea chooses to field. The October 8 test therefore signals something broader than a single missile launch: South Korea is steadily expanding the technological foundations required to sustain a more autonomous, advanced and credible national defense posture.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
Ideal Aerosmith Unveils Troublemaker Drone for Long-Range Strike and Attritable Mass Operations
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
Ideal Aerosmith has unveiled Troublemaker, a low-cost Group 3 uncrewed aircraft designed to bring long-range strike, surveillance and decoy capabilities to forces operating without runways or heavy support infrastructure. With more than 10 hours of endurance, a claimed range exceeding 750 nautical miles and a payload of up to 30 pounds, the aircraft can operate as an expendable one-way attack platform or be recovered for reuse, giving forces a flexible way to generate affordable mass, extend combat reach and sustain operations in contested environments.

Ideal Aerosmith has unveiled its Troublemaker Group 3 UAS designed for long-range attritable strike ISR and mass operations with more than 10 hours of endurance and a range exceeding 750 nautical miles (Picture Source: Ideal Aerosmith)

Ideal Aerosmith is expanding into the rapidly evolving attritable autonomous-systems market with Troublemaker, a Group 3 uncrewed aircraft built around a demanding proposition: delivering greater operational reach without the cost and infrastructure burden associated with larger unmanned platforms. In an announcement released on October 8, 2026, the North Dakota-based company presented Troublemaker as a low-cost, long-range UAS engineered for scalable strike operations, more than 10 hours of endurance and adaptable employment across austere and contested environments. Its significance extends beyond one-way attack, combining affordable mass, persistence, modularity and rapid production within a two-person-portable Group 3 platform.

Rather than defining Troublemaker solely as an expendable strike aircraft, Ideal Aerosmith is positioning it across a broader mission spectrum encompassing one-way attack, ISR, long-range surveillance and wingman or decoy operations. Additional specifications were subsequently disclosed by company executive David Markert in an October 2 interview with Breaking Defense and reported by the publication on October 9. According to that reporting, Troublemaker has a roughly 15-foot wingspan, carries a payload of up to 30 pounds and has a claimed range exceeding 750 nautical miles. The aircraft can be launched from a catapult or truck, while skid recovery allows it to be reused when a mission does not require its loss. These characteristics potentially give operators a platform that can shift between expendable and recoverable missions while reducing dependence on fixed runways or specialized launch aircraft.

Related Topic: U.S. Army Conducts Evaluation of Hornet AI-Enabled Kamikaze Drone in Germany for Fire Support Integration

The program becomes particularly noteworthy when affordable mass is considered as an industrial requirement rather than simply a promise of lower unit cost. Markert told Breaking Defense that Ideal Aerosmith had already built 26 Troublemaker aircraft and was entering low-rate production at approximately two systems per week. He said the company’s existing infrastructure could support production of as many as 20 aircraft per week if sufficient demand emerges. That potential tenfold increase does not mean such an output rate has been funded or ordered, but it provides important context for Ideal Aerosmith’s emphasis on scalability. Attritable systems generate military value through numbers only when industry can produce, replace and replenish them at rates compatible with sustained operations. Troublemaker’s production model could become as important as its flight performance if the system progresses toward significant procurement.

Troublemaker’s recoverability also creates a more complex operational proposition than the term “one-way attack” alone suggests. More than 10 hours of endurance, combined with a claimed 750-plus-nautical-mile range and the option to recover the aircraft, could allow the same basic platform to support persistent surveillance, reconnaissance, deception or collaborative missions before being assigned to an expendable strike role when operational circumstances require it. This introduces a potentially important cost-per-effect advantage: commanders would not necessarily need to sacrifice an aircraft on every mission simply because it is designed to be attritable. Ideal Aerosmith’s modular approach reinforces that flexibility, allowing the aircraft to be considered less as a single-purpose munition and more as a configurable uncrewed platform capable of supporting different effects across a campaign. The company has not publicly disclosed Troublemaker’s unit price, however, making it impossible at present to independently assess how its “low-cost” positioning translates into actual acquisition economics.

The architecture also points toward operations involving multiple coordinated uncrewed aircraft. Ideal Aerosmith’s formal announcement emphasizes interoperable, modular systems able to evolve alongside changing mission requirements, while Markert told Breaking Defense that Troublemaker can operate in swarms. Such an approach could allow groups of relatively inexpensive aircraft to distribute different functions, surveillance, deception, targeting support or kinetic effects, across several air vehicles instead of concentrating capability in a smaller number of expensive platforms. In contested airspace, that could complicate an adversary’s detection, identification and defensive prioritization while forcing air defenses to confront larger numbers of potential targets. Important technical questions nevertheless remain unanswered, including Troublemaker’s demonstrated level of autonomy, communications architecture, electronic-warfare resilience, navigation in GPS-denied environments and the scale at which coordinated operations have actually been tested.

Troublemaker also has a potentially significant U.S. Navy connection. Markert told Breaking Defense that the system has a Department of the Navy “sponsor” and said Ideal Aerosmith has responded to relevant government solicitations. That disclosure indicates a level of government interest but does not establish that the Navy has selected Troublemaker for a program of record, awarded a production contract or committed to purchasing a specific quantity of aircraft. Markert also indicated that the continuing-resolution environment could affect relevant new-start activities. From an operational perspective, however, a long-range system able to launch without a runway and operate from dispersed positions could have particular relevance to maritime and expeditionary concepts where forces must distribute sensors and strike capacity across widely separated locations. The exact nature of the Navy relationship, potential procurement pathway and funding status remain undisclosed.

The industrial base behind Troublemaker may ultimately determine whether those operational ambitions can be translated into military scale. Ideal Aerosmith says the aircraft is backed by a secure U.S.-based supply chain and that its Government Systems division is developing producible, interoperable uncrewed systems alongside mission-planning and command-and-control software, low-cost propulsion and scalable manufacturing capabilities. In a high-intensity conflict, the relevance of an attritable aircraft depends not only on whether commanders are prepared to lose individual systems, but on whether manufacturers can replace them faster than operational demand consumes them.

Troublemaker embodies a broader shift in uncrewed warfare: away from relying exclusively on small numbers of highly sophisticated platforms and toward combinations of reach, persistence, adaptability and production volume. Ideal Aerosmith still has important questions to answer on price, survivability, propulsion, autonomy, payload integration and government procurement. But if the company can validate its performance claims while converting stated manufacturing capacity into sustained production, Troublemaker could offer commanders an increasingly valuable capability, a long-range aircraft affordable enough to field in numbers, persistent enough to perform more than a single mission type, and adaptable enough to move between sensing, deception, collaboration and kinetic effects as battlefield requirements change.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
Lockheed Martin Debuts PAC-3 Edge Patriot Interceptor Designed to Counter Hypersonic and Advanced Missile Threats
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
Lockheed Martin unveiled PAC-3 Edge on October 9, 2026, a next-generation Patriot interceptor designed to give the U.S. Army greater reach, altitude and maneuverability against advanced ballistic, maneuvering and hypersonic threats. Building on the combat-proven PAC-3 MSE, the new interceptor combines higher velocity and increased power with technologies aimed at expanding the Patriot system’s defensive envelope, with testing expected from 2027 and rapid deployment targeted for 2031 as the Army prepares for increasingly complex missile attacks.

Lockheed Martin’s PAC-3 Edge pushes Patriot missile defense toward greater range, altitude and maneuverability as the U.S. Army prepares to defeat increasingly sophisticated missile and hypersonic threats (Picture Source: Lockheed Martin)

The U.S. Army is preparing its air and missile defenses for a battlespace increasingly shaped by maneuvering missiles, hypersonic weapons and increasingly sophisticated attack profiles. Lockheed Martin raised the technological bar on October 9, 2026, unveiling PAC-3 Edge, its next-generation interceptor for the Army’s competitive Future Interceptor program. According to Lockheed Martin’s official announcement, the weapon builds on the combat-proven PAC-3 MSE while introducing new technologies intended to reach farther, operate higher and confront some of the most advanced threats expected to challenge U.S. and allied defenses.

PAC-3 Edge represents much more than another evolutionary addition to the Patriot missile family. Lockheed Martin is positioning the interceptor as the next major step beyond the highly capable PAC-3 Missile Segment Enhancement, combining greater maneuverability, power and velocity with increased performance at range and altitude. The Army has already selected Lockheed Martin to progress into the next stage of the Future Interceptor competition, with development continuing toward testing beginning in 2027 and preparations for rapid deployment by 2031. For the Army’s future Patriot interceptor requirement, the objective is clear: extend the defensive envelope against more demanding air, missile and hypersonic targets while retaining the technological foundation of one of America’s most successful interceptor families.

Related Topic: U.S. Weighs Potential Decade-Long F-35 Production and Sustainment Framework With Lockheed Martin

At the heart of PAC-3 Edge is a new Lockheed Martin-built seeker developed through the company’s Strigo Product Center, backed by a $250 million company investment in advanced seeker technology. Lockheed Martin says the new sensor is designed to increase precision and maneuverability against evolving threats. That capability becomes especially significant when confronting high-speed or maneuvering weapons, where the interceptor must rapidly refine its understanding of the target and maintain the accuracy needed during the terminal phase of an engagement. Lockheed Martin’s investment in the seeker also highlights the company’s ability to bring advanced sensing technology directly into the next generation of U.S. missile defense rather than relying solely on incremental improvements to existing hardware.

PAC-3 Edge also attacks the future interception problem from the propulsion and flight-control side. The interceptor incorporates a multi-pulse solid rocket motor designed by Northrop Grumman, providing precision thrust throughout flight, while Lockheed Martin has introduced control-system upgrades aimed at increasing performance at greater ranges and altitudes. Viewed together, the new seeker, propulsion system and upgraded controls form a tightly connected architecture: the seeker helps the interceptor find and precisely pursue the target, the motor supplies the energy needed to reach demanding engagement zones, and the control system provides the maneuver authority required to complete the intercept. This combination is particularly relevant against hypersonic and advanced missile threats, where speed, changing trajectories and compressed engagement timelines can place extraordinary demands on defensive systems.

The result is an interceptor intended to give the Army a broader engagement envelope than the current PAC-3 generation, with Lockheed Martin specifically identifying higher-altitude and longer-range engagements as key characteristics of PAC-3 Edge. Greater reach is not simply a question of distance. In a layered defense architecture, the ability to engage threats farther away and at higher altitude can potentially increase geographic coverage and create additional defensive opportunities before an incoming weapon reaches the assets it is targeting. Lockheed Martin’s approach points toward an interceptor designed for the hardest end of the threat spectrum, strengthening the United States’ ability to protect military formations, strategic infrastructure and critical assets against increasingly capable missile systems.

Another major feature of PAC-3 Edge is its planned role inside the Army’s increasingly networked Integrated Air and Missile Defense architecture. Lockheed Martin says the interceptor is designed for integration with the Integrated Battle Command System (IBCS), M903 launcher, containerized launchers and HIMARS Flex. That integration strategy gives PAC-3 Edge significance beyond the traditional concept of a Patriot interceptor tied to a single launcher architecture. It points toward a future in which sensors, command-and-control networks and distributed launch platforms can work together to position advanced interceptors where commanders need them most. The inclusion of containerized launchers and HIMARS Flex also indicates that Lockheed Martin is designing PAC-3 Edge with future deployment flexibility in mind, potentially giving the Army more options for dispersing and employing high-end missile-defense capability across contested theaters.

The development schedule adds another strategic dimension. Beginning testing in 2027 while preparing for rapid deployment by 2031 reflects the urgency surrounding next-generation air and missile defense as potential adversaries continue developing faster, more maneuverable and more complex weapons. Lockheed Martin enters that challenge with the considerable advantage of PAC-3’s combat-proven heritage and decades of experience in Integrated Air and Missile Defense. PAC-3 Edge seeks to preserve that foundation while pushing the interceptor into a new performance class, an approach that can reduce technological risk while allowing the U.S. Army to pursue substantial increases in capability. Lockheed Martin’s advancement into the next development phase also reinforces the company’s position as one of the central industrial players shaping the future of American missile defense.

PAC-3 Edge gives the United States a highly ambitious path toward the Army’s future Patriot interceptor: combine the proven PAC-3 MSE foundation with a new seeker, multi-pulse propulsion, enhanced flight controls, greater intended range and altitude performance, and integration across an expanding network of Army launch and battle-management systems. Its design is aimed directly at the increasingly difficult challenge posed by advanced and hypersonic missile threats. If Lockheed Martin demonstrates those capabilities through the coming test program, PAC-3 Edge could become a powerful new layer in America’s air and missile defense architecture and another example of how U.S. defense industry innovation is being directed toward preserving technological superiority against the most sophisticated threats of the future.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
U.S. Moves to Arm B-52s With LRASM as It Builds a New Long-Range Maritime Strike Architecture for the Indo-Pacific
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
The United States is moving to arm the B-52H Stratofortress with theLong Range Anti-Ship Missile, combining the bomber’s reach and payload with a potent stand-off weapon for maritime warfare. A Naval Air Systems Command notice published on October 7, 2026, points to renewed integration work that could expand U.S. long-range anti-ship firepower and complicate naval defense planning across the Indo-Pacific.

A U.S. Air Force B-52H Stratofortress flies with multiple AGM-158 JASSM stand-off missiles mounted on its wing pylons. The missiles shown are JASSM weapons and not AGM-158C LRASM (Picture Source: X-account @TallGlenn85)

The United States is moving to give the B-52H Stratofortress a potentially formidable new maritime-strike role, combining the bomber’s exceptional reach and payload with one of America’s most advanced anti-ship weapons. On October 7, 2026, Naval Air Systems Command published a presolicitation notice covering LRASM integration and test support for the B-52, bringing renewed momentum to an effort that could eventually reshape how U.S. long-range airpower contributes to maritime warfare. More than another missile certification, the initiative points toward a wider American strategy built around distributed firepower, operational unpredictability and the ability to threaten hostile naval forces from multiple domains and launch axes.

NAVAIR’s announcement is carefully defined. The command intends to enter sole-source negotiations with Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control for a Cost Plus Fixed Fee delivery order under an existing Basic Ordering Agreement. The prospective work covers missile software updates, associated testing, test-asset repair and failure review boards. NAVAIR identifies Lockheed Martin as LRASM’s sole designer, developer, manufacturer and integrator, arguing that the company possesses the knowledge, experience and technical data needed within the government’s required timeframe. The notice, however, is a presolicitation rather than an operational fielding announcement: it provides no contract value, certification date or confirmed B-52 LRASM loadout, and states that the government is not committed to making an award.

Related Topic: U.S. Navy Expands Long-Range Maritime Strike Strategy with Nearly $1B LRASM Procurement in FY2027

The reference to missile software updates is particularly revealing because LRASM integration is not simply a question of fitting a weapon beneath a bomber. The B-52, its weapons-management architecture, launch equipment, missile software, safety logic and mission systems must operate as a coherent system. That effort is taking place while the bomber itself enters one of the most extensive modernization periods in its history. In September 2026, the U.S. Air Force said ongoing B-52 weapons-integration work includes the latest variants of LRASM and the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile alongside new radar, communications and propulsion programs intended to keep the aircraft operationally relevant into the 2050s. This creates a broader picture in which LRASM is not an isolated modification but one element of a much more capable future B-52 weapons ecosystem.

The pairing also has considerable technical logic. LRASM, designated AGM-158C, draws heavily on the JASSM family architecture already associated with the B-52. The bomber has demonstrated the ability to carry eight AGM-158-family JASSMs internally on its Conventional Rotary Launcher while accommodating another 12 weapons externally, creating a 20-missile JASSM architecture. That makes a similarly large LRASM load technically conceivable, but it should not yet be described as an established B-52 configuration because the October NAVAIR notice gives no carriage number. What is already clear is the potential operational value of pairing a high-capacity bomber with a weapon NAVAIR says was designed for long-range attacks against high-threat maritime targets while reducing dependence on persistent ISR, network links and GPS in contested electronic-warfare environments.

This distinction goes directly to the strategic logic of the program. An LRASM-equipped B-52 would not need to become a penetrating bomber or independently search the ocean for enemy warships to be useful. Its strength would more likely come from functioning as a high-capacity, globally deployable reservoir of maritime firepower, releasing stand-off weapons from outside the densest portions of hostile air defenses while other U.S. assets contribute sensing, targeting, electronic warfare and additional weapons. A bomber formation could potentially add considerable salvo depth to attacks already being generated by submarines, surface combatants, carrier aviation, land-based forces and other Air Force platforms. Missiles arriving from different directions or on separated timelines could also force an opposing naval formation to divide attention, sensors and defensive interceptors across a more complex threat picture.

There is an important limit to that concept: missile autonomy should not be confused with an autonomous maritime kill chain. LRASM’s guidance is designed to reduce reliance on continuous external support and NAVAIR says it can operate from less-precise targeting information, but mobile naval forces must still be detected, identified and located with enough accuracy for weapons to be placed into the correct battlespace. The true value of the B-52/LRASM combination would consequently depend on the wider U.S. targeting architecture, space-based sensors, maritime patrol aircraft, submarines, unmanned systems, tactical aviation and other classified or unclassified intelligence networks, as much as on the missile itself. In a highly contested Indo-Pacific environment, the American advantage would likely come from combining those sensors with multiple shooters rather than expecting any single platform to dominate the engagement.

The bomber-force transition adds another layer. The B-1B became the first U.S. Air Force bomber to reach early operational capability with LRASM in 2018, giving the service an established heavy-bomber counter-maritime mission. Yet the Air Force has also made clear that its long-term bomber structure is intended to transition toward a force centered on the rebuilt B-52 and the next-generation B-21 as legacy aircraft are gradually retired. Integrating LRASM on the B-52 could help preserve heavy-bomber maritime strike capacity across that transition rather than leaving the capability concentrated on a shrinking B-1 fleet. The June 2026 employment of LRASM by a B-2 during a live-fire sinking exercise north of the Mariana Islands reinforces the same wider trend: anti-ship warfare is becoming increasingly embedded within U.S. long-range bomber operations rather than remaining primarily a naval aviation mission.

The Indo-Pacific geography makes this especially relevant. China has built increasingly capable naval, air, missile and sensor forces designed in part to make U.S. operations around the Western Pacific more difficult and costly. A B-52 armed with LRASM would not erase those challenges, but it could add another layer of uncertainty to Chinese operational planning. Beijing would have to consider maritime strikes originating not only from carrier aircraft, submarines or regional bases, but from heavy bombers approaching from widely separated directions and potentially operating from locations well beyond the first island chain. Pacific Air Forces already uses Bomber Task Force deployments to operate strategic bombers from a broad array of overseas and continental U.S. locations, explicitly emphasizing resilience and operational unpredictability. LRASM could give that existing deployment model a more powerful counter-maritime dimension.

This geographic elasticity may be more important than basing the bomber at any single Pacific installation. Guam would remain an important staging and support location, but the strategic attraction of the B-52 is that American maritime strike would not have to depend exclusively on Guam. Bombers could potentially generate sorties from other Pacific facilities, Alaska, Hawaii, Australia or the continental United States, subject to mission requirements, tanker availability and political access. That creates what could be described as deterrence through uncertainty: an opponent must account for where U.S. firepower might originate, which platforms may carry it and how different launch forces could be combined. The objective is not simply to increase the number of missiles available, but to increase the number of credible American strike combinations an adversary must detect, track and counter.

The same logic applies to salvo generation. A large bomber weapons capacity becomes especially useful when paired with naval and air-launched weapons attacking across multiple axes. An opposing fleet might face submarines threatening from below the surface, ship-launched missiles approaching from another direction, tactical aircraft operating closer to the theater and B-52s supplying additional stand-off weapons from much farther away. Even where individual elements of such an attack can be defended against, the cumulative burden on surveillance systems, command networks, electronic-warfare assets and interceptor inventories could become much harder to manage. From a U.S. perspective, this is one of LRASMintegration’s most compelling attributes: the B-52 would add mass without requiring Washington to concentrate all of its valuable strike platforms close to the adversary.

Industrial capacity remains a critical part of that equation. A bomber capable of carrying a large missile load provides only part of the required combat power if available stocks cannot support repeated operations. The United States would need enough LRASMs, JASSMs and related stand-off weapons to generate follow-on salvos after the opening stages of a conflict, while simultaneously maintaining weapons for other theaters and platforms. Launch-platform expansion and missile production should consequently be viewed as closely linked components of deterrence. An adversary must not only believe that the United States can generate a powerful first response, but also that American industry and inventories can sustain long-range precision warfare if a confrontation becomes prolonged.

The prospective integration of LRASM onto the B-52 should be viewed as far more than another upgrade to an aircraft whose basic design dates to the early Cold War. If the current NAVAIR effort advances through software development, testing and eventual operational certification, the Stratofortress could become another high-capacity node in an increasingly distributed American maritime-strike network. Seen from that perspective, LRASM would make the B-52 less a dedicated ship hunter than a globally deployable reservoir of maritime firepower, one that commanders could insert into the Indo-Pacific battlespace when and where it offers the greatest operational advantage.

The broader U.S. strategy appears aimed at creating redundancy, range and uncertainty rather than relying on a single platform or basing model. A future opponent could be forced to consider maritime attacks from submarines, surface ships, tactical aircraft, stealth bombers and B-52s operating from dispersed locations, all potentially connected through a wider joint targeting architecture. That does not guarantee battlefield success, and much would still depend on targeting quality, tanker availability, resilient bases, missile inventories and communications under attack. Yet it would make successful aggression more difficult to plan with confidence. The October 2026 NAVAIR notice is still an early acquisition step, but the strategic direction behind it is increasingly visible: the United States is building a long-range force designed to preserve freedom of action, reinforce its allies and ensure that hostile naval forces cannot assume sanctuary anywhere across the vast Indo-Pacific.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
US redeploys MQ-9 Reaper drones from Africa to Colombia and Ecuador to fight drug cartels
{loadposition bannertop}

{loadposition sidebarpub}
The United States has transferred multiple MQ-9 Reaper drones from Africa Command counterterrorism missions to Colombia and Ecuador to support U.S. Southern Command’s expanding campaign against regional drug cartels. The redistribution expands intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance coverage over key northern trafficking routes and border zones. Operating from regional locations significantly increases target dwell time and persistent tracking capabilities compared to previous long-range sorties launched from Puerto Rico.

The U.S. has redeployed several MQ-9 Reaper drones from Africa to Colombia and Ecuador to support operations against drug cartels, with two aircraft already operating in Ecuador and three more planned for Colombia. (Picture source: US DoD)

On October 6, 2026, the New York Times reported that U.S. officials confirmed the transfer of several MQ-9 Reaper drones from U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM)'s counterterrorism missions, particularly against al-Shabaab in Somalia, to Colombia and Ecuador, as part of U.S. Southern Command's (SOUTHCOM) expanding campaign against South American drug cartels. Ecuadorian Defense Minister Gian Carlo Loffredo confirmed on October 2 that two Reapers had arrived and were already operating over Ecuador, including to surveil its 732-kilometer border with Colombia. Bogotá has separately arranged to loan three MQ-9As and is considering purchasing a fourth, although deliveries remain unconfirmed.

The redistribution follows the confirmed destruction of at least 45 MQ-9s during the 2026 Iran conflict, equivalent to 24.7% of the U.S. Air Force's September 2025 inventory of 182, as well as after at least 71 U.S. strikes against suspected trafficking vessels since September 2025. Ecuador's deployment is concentrated on cocaine movements through its northern provinces, where trafficking routes connect Colombian production nodes to distribution networks connected to the Pacific coast. These provinces, Esmeraldas, Carchi, and Sucumbíos, face different trafficking conditions: Esmeraldas provides coastal access, Carchi contains road connections through the Andes, and Sucumbíos borders Colombian jungle and river corridors. Taura Air Base in Guayas has been associated with the MQ-9 deployment, although permanent basing and operating responsibilities remain unconfirmed.

Related topic:US Air Force shortlists seven companies to replace MQ-9 Reaper with 500 new MMA combat drones

Colombia's three planned Reapers would concentrate on Nariño, Cauca, Putumayo, and Norte de Santander, where cocaine production and transportation corridors intersect with the activities of the National Liberation Army (ELN), FARC dissident factions, and other criminal organizations. The distinction matters because Ecuador is principally a transit and export country, while Colombia contains cultivation areas, processing laboratories, territorial networks, and departure routes. Ecuador's constitutional prohibition on foreign military bases, reaffirmed in a 2025 referendum, also places legal constraints on any permanent U.S. military installation, even though temporary deployments and bilateral operations may follow different arrangements.

The MQ-9A Reaper entered service with the U.S. Air Force on May 1, 2007, following its first flight on February 2, 2001, and can observe repeated movements between suspected production sites, river crossings, and coastal departure points during a single mission. The unmanned aircraft has a 20.1-meter wingspan, an 11-meter length, a 3.8-meter height, and a baseline maximum takeoff weight of 4,760 kg. Its Honeywell TPE331-10 turboprop generates 950 shaft horsepower, providing a maximum speed of 482 km/h, a cruising speed of 278 to 315 km/h, and an altitude ceiling of 15,240 meters. Six external attachment points accommodate up to 1,700 kg of payload, with the two inner stations rated at 680 kg each, the two middle stations at 272 kg each, and the two outer stations at 91 kg each. Surveillance endurance reaches 27 to 30 hours, while extended-range configurations equipped with additional fuel can reach 33 to 35 hours.

Carrying weapons logically reduces the available endurance depending on the load. The MQ-9's principal surveillance equipment includes the AN/AAS-52 multispectral targeting system, which combines daylight and infrared cameras with laser ranging and designation, and the Lynx multimode radar, which provides synthetic aperture imagery, ground moving-target indication, and maritime search functions. Over Colombia, these sensors could monitor vehicles approaching suspected cocaine-processing facilities, identify activity at clandestine airstrips, and follow exposed movements between roads and river crossings. In Ecuador, the same set could help track small vessels departing coastal locations, monitor transport routes leading toward Guayaquil and Posorja, and identify repeated activity near suspected loading points. The Reaper can also fire AGM-114 Hellfire missiles, GBU-12 Paveway II laser-guided bombs, and GBU-38 JDAM weapons, while a 2020 upgrade demonstrated an eight-Hellfire configuration.

In South America, however, the dense forest canopy remains a significant limitation because optical and infrared sensors cannot reliably observe personnel or equipment concealed beneath vegetation, and radar detection does not automatically establish whether a vehicle or vessel is carrying narcotics. No confirmed information establishes that the Reapers operating in Ecuador are armed, that Colombia's aircraft will arrive with weapons, or that either contingent has conducted lethal strikes. Operating closer to trafficking areas could substantially increase surveillance time compared with missions launched from Rafael Hernández Airport in Puerto Rico, where at least nine MQ-9s were observed in December 2025. At 170 knots, direct flights covering 938 nautical miles to Colombia or 1,451 nautical miles to Ecuador require 5.5 or 8.5 hours each way.

Within a theoretical 27-hour mission, return transit leaves 16 hours over Colombia or 10 hours over Ecuador, before fuel reserves and routing allowances. Potential areas could include Colombia's Pacific departments of Nariño and Cauca, which contain coca-growing areas and connections to coastal departure points, as well as Ecuador's Guayaquil, Manta, and Posorja ports, which provide access to container shipping networks serving Europe and North America. U.S.-Ecuadorian cooperation already includes maritime vessels, Black Hawk helicopters, surveillance aircraft, and riverine boats, creating potential opportunities to convert aerial detections into interceptions. In September 2026, Washington also announced plans for $45 million in additional security assistance to Ecuador, including a Coast Guard cutter and five interceptor vessels, following seven previously supplied vessels.

The MQ-9s could complement those maritime assets by locating suspected vessels and maintaining contact until an interception force arrives, provided communications and national operating authorities permit coordinated action. The redistribution coincides with a change in SOUTHCOM's organization and the geographical scope of U.S. counter-cartel operations. Gen. Francis L. Donovan assumed command in February 2026, the Americas Counter Cartel Coalition was launched in March and expanded to 19 participating countries, and SOUTHCOM established an Autonomous Warfare Command in April before activating Joint Task Force-Western Hemisphere in August. U.S. military strikes against suspected trafficking vessels, for their part, began on September 2, 2025, when Washington announced the deaths of 11 alleged Tren de Aragua members. By early October 2026, this campaign had killed more than 200 people, although cumulative counts differ between organizations tracking individual strikes.

On October 4, a further U.S. attack killed four people aboard a suspected trafficking vessel in the Caribbean, bringing one independently maintained count to 70 strikes and 235 deaths. The U.S. military did not provide publicly verifiable evidence that narcotics were aboard that vessel, and the legal basis for lethal action against suspected traffickers remains disputed. Washington is also pursuing operations against inland infrastructure, including cocaine laboratories, clandestine airstrips, illegal mining facilities, and transport networks. In Colombia, President Abelardo de la Espriella's government established Joint Task Force Urano on October 6 to coordinate military and police operations against the ELN in the northeast, following September's Operation JOTAM, during which police seized 4,921.5 kg of cocaine, arrested 32 people, and identified 103 trafficking cases involving airport networks.

Ecuadorian operations supported by U.S. agencies also targeted Los Lobos and Los Choneros on August 26, producing more than 20 initial arrests and the disabling of two clandestine airstrips. Nevertheless, the scale of the regional cocaine economy explains why additional surveillance aircraft or operations do not necessarily translate into reduced drug availability. Colombia recorded 253,000 hectares of coca cultivation in 2023, 10% more than in 2022, while potential cocaine manufacture increased 53%, from 1,738 to 2,644 metric tons. Globally, coca cultivation reached 385,100 hectares in 2024, while potential cocaine manufacture reached 4,100 metric tons, compared with 869 metric tons in 2014. Ecuador's importance comes primarily from its geographical position between Colombia and Peru and its commercial connections to international markets. Its Pacific ports, container terminals, and road infrastructure allow criminal organizations to move cocaine into legitimate cargo flows, including agricultural exports.

Competition for those routes has contributed to violence involving port access, territorial control, extortion, and prison-based criminal networks. Ecuador recorded 9,216 intentional homicides in 2025, an increase of 32% over 2024, equivalent to 50.91 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants. The MQ-9 deployment therefore addresses distinct security problems: surveillance of production areas and armed organizations in Colombia, and identification of cross-border trafficking movements and export logistics in Ecuador, reflecting a security crisis extending beyond cocaine transportation. As of October 9, 2026, the available indicators show intensified enforcement but no demonstrated contraction of the cocaine market attributable to U.S. military strikes. Global cocaine seizures increased 70% between 2020 and 2024, meaning that larger seizures cannot independently establish a reduction in the total quantity reaching consumers.

By July 2026, cocaine availability, purity, and prices in the United States had not shown changes consistent with a major supply disruption from the maritime campaign, while traffickers continued adapting routes, vessels, and transportation methods. Between January 1 and October 3, 2026, Ecuadorian authorities conducted 493,793 security operations, apprehended 57,611 people, and seized more than 141 tons of drugs. The Reapers could therefore increase the time available to identify suspected facilities, follow exposed transport movements, and direct interception forces toward specific locations, but they cannot independently determine cargo contents, dismantle financial networks, or prevent replacement shipments.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, South Korea, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.