Skip to main content

North Korea Tests Cruise and Anti-Ship Missiles from New Choe Hyon Destroyer in Dual-Strike Drill.


North Korea fired cruise and anti-ship missiles from its new Choe Hyon-class destroyer during a live-fire drill off its western coast on April 12. The test signals Pyongyang’s push to field multi-role surface combatants capable of both land attack and maritime strike missions.

The exercise combined strategic cruise missile launches with anti-ship weapons in a coordinated strike scenario designed to validate the vessel’s integrated combat systems and crew performance. The Choe Hyon-class guided-missile destroyer, a newer addition to North Korea’s surface fleet, appears configured to execute dual-mission profiles from a single platform. Kim Jong Un observed the test alongside senior military officials, reinforcing the program’s priority within North Korea’s evolving naval modernization effort. Initial assessments suggest the drill focused on synchronizing onboard sensors, fire control systems, and weapon release sequencing under operational conditions.
Related topic: North Korea Plans 12 Nuclear-Armed Destroyers by 2030 After Choe Hyon Missile Test

North Korea conducts a new series of missile launches from its naval destroyer Choe Hyon as part of an ongoing effort to refine sea-based strike capabilities (Picture source: KCNA)


The Choe Hyon class guided-missile destroyer, built at Nampo and Hambuk shipyards and entering service from 2025, reflects a more ambitious naval construction effort than previously observed in the Korean People’s Navy. With an estimated displacement of around 5,000 tons and a hull length approaching 145 meters, the ship introduces a larger surface combatant optimized for multi-role missions. Two units are already assessed as active, while additional hulls remain under construction, indicating a phased expansion toward at least four vessels. This scale suggests a shift away from purely coastal defense units toward ships capable of extended patrols and coordinated operations.

According to the Korean Central News Agency on April 14 2026, the exercise includes the launch of two strategic cruise missiles and three anti ship missiles, with the stated objective of assessing the destroyer’s integrated fire control and command systems. The report also highlights efforts to improve crew proficiency in missile handling procedures while confirming the accuracy of upgraded navigation systems designed to resist electronic interference. Flight durations released by KCNA indicate that the cruise missiles remain airborne for between 7,869 and 7,920 seconds, while the anti-ship missiles fly for approximately 1,960 to 1,973 seconds before striking their targets.

Sensor integration appears central to this design. The destroyer is equipped with phased array radars, which allow simultaneous tracking of multiple aerial and surface targets while supporting fire control solutions for missile engagements. Complementing this system are Type 362 air and surface search radars, along with three dedicated fire control radars that guide weapons during terminal engagement phases. A hull-mounted sonar provides basic anti-submarine detection capability, although its effective range remains dependent on acoustic conditions and operator proficiency. Identification friend or foe systems and electronic support measures further contribute to situational awareness, especially in congested maritime environments.

The vessel’s armament reflects an attempt to combine layered offensive and defensive capabilities. A vertical launch system estimated at 88 cells of varying sizes enables the deployment of different missile types, including cruise missiles and potentially surface-to-air interceptors. This configuration allows flexible loadouts depending on mission requirements. The ship also carries fixed anti-ship missile launchers arranged in quadruple configurations, as well as torpedo tubes compatible with 533 mm munitions such as the DTA-53, providing a limited anti-submarine warfare option. Close-in defense is ensured by a Pantsir-ME system, which integrates radar and electro-optical tracking to engage incoming missiles or aircraft at short range, supported by additional 30 mm close-in weapon systems. A main naval gun in the 127 mm to 130 mm class offers surface fire support and limited anti-air capability.

The cruise missiles tested during the exercise are typically powered by turbofan engines, enabling sustained low altitude flight with terrain following capability that complicates detection by conventional radar systems. Their guidance relies on inertial navigation systems combined with satellite updates when available, while the reported integration of anti- jamming features suggests a focus on maintaining accuracy in electronically contested environments. In parallel, the anti-ship missiles employ active radar seekers during the terminal phase, allowing autonomous target acquisition after mid-course guidance and enhancing effectiveness against moving naval targets.

The integration of cruise and anti-ship missiles within a vertical launch architecture allows the destroyer to shift rapidly between land attack and sea denial roles. The presence of a flight deck capable of supporting a helicopter or unmanned aerial vehicle introduces an additional reconnaissance layer, potentially extending targeting range beyond the ship’s organic sensors. If connected to external surveillance assets through data links, the destroyer could operate within a broader networked framework, although the robustness of such connectivity under combat conditions remains uncertain.

Moreover, the emphasis on electronic warfare systems, including radar electronic support measures and countermeasure dispensers, indicates an effort to reduce vulnerability to detection and targeting. These systems can identify hostile emissions, trigger decoy deployment, and attempt to degrade incoming missile guidance, contributing to survivability in contested environments. However, limitations in crew training cycles and operational experience at sea may constrain the effective use of these technologies in complex engagements.

These developments reflect a broader pattern in which North Korea seeks to diversify its nuclear and conventional delivery mechanisms. By extending deterrence beyond land-based ballistic missiles to include sea-based cruise missile options deployed on surface combatants, Pyongyang complicates the threat matrix faced by the United States, South Korea, and Japan. The emergence of a small flotilla of missile-armed destroyers, if sustained through serial production, introduces additional uncertainty into regional maritime security calculations and increases the potential for escalation in contested waters.


Written By Erwan Halna du Fretay - Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group
Erwan Halna du Fretay holds a Master’s degree in International Relations and has experience studying conflicts and global arms transfers. His research interests lie in security and strategic studies, particularly the dynamics of the defense industry, the evolution of military technologies, and the strategic transformation of armed forces.


Copyright © 2019 - 2024 Army Recognition | Webdesign by Zzam