Ukraine uses new FP-7 ballistic missile against Russia for first time before mass production.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced the first combat deployment of the domestically developed Fire Point FP-7 tactical ballistic missile against Russian targets. The operational milestone transitions the 250 km-range weapon from flight testing into active service, expanding Ukraine's capacity for deep precision strikes against fixed military infrastructure.

The FP-7 tactical ballistic missile features a maximum range of 250 km, a 200 kg warhead payload, and a circular error probable (CEP) of 14 m. Developed by Fire Point within an accelerated seven-month timeframe from initial flight tests, the system is designed to target operational-depth assets including ammunition depots and command nodes.

Related topic: Ukraine's new FP-9 ballistic missile to target Moscow's energy infrastructure by summer 2026

Ukraine used its new FP-7 ballistic missile against Russian forces for the first time on October 1, 2026, just 216 days after flight testing began, and with its range and payload already increased to 250 km and 200 kg. (Picture source: Army Recognition and Telegram/Volodymyr Zelenskyy)

On October 1, 2026, Ukraine conducted the first combat use of Fire Point's FP-7 tactical ballistic missile, 392 days after its September 4, 2025 unveiling at MSPO in Poland. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy released launch footage and said production was next, but Ukraine disclosed neither the target, launch location, number of missiles, nor strike result, so the event confirms operational employment rather than wartime accuracy or effectiveness. The FP-7 moved from flight testing on February 27-28, 2026 to combat in seven months, with about 15 test launches reported by August and preparations for combat trials underway by September. Compared with the closest U.S. equivalents, seven months from first flight testing to combat use is exceptionally compressed, as the PrSM required 48 months from first flight to initial delivery. The current FP-7 is also more capable on paper than the FP-7 initially disclosed in 2025, with a maximum range of 250 km and a payload of 200 kg, compared with the earlier 200 km and 150 kg configuration, increasing range by 50 km (25%) and payload by 50 kg (33.3%).

The maximum velocity remains at 1,500 m/s (5,400 km/h), with a flight altitude of 60 km and a Circular Error Probable (CEP) of 14 m. The CEP means that, if 100 missiles were fired under the conditions represented by that figure, statistically 50 would be expected to impact within 14 m of the aim point and 50 outside that 14 m radius. The FP-7 is intended for operational-depth targets rather than the deeper target set assigned to Fire Point's other missiles. The FP-9 short-range ballistic missile reaches 850 to 855 km with an 800 kg payload, giving it 3.4 times the FP-7 range and four times its payload, while the FP-5 Flamingo cruise missile's range extends to about 3,000 km with up to 1,200 kg. The FP-7 can therefore focus on fixed targets such as ammunition depots, headquarters, railway nodes, airfields and air defense sites within its launch geometry, while its maximum speed reduces flight time compared with other Ukrainian cruise missiles and one-way attack drones.

The FP-7's rapid development is easier to explain when its relationship with the Soviet 48N6 missile is considered. The FP-7 is about 7.25 m long, close to the 48N6 at about 7.5 m and 0.51 m diameter; the baseline 48N6 weighs about 1,900 kg, carries a 145 kg warhead and reaches about 150 km, while the later 48N6M and 48N6DM extend to roughly 200 and 250 km with 150 and 180 kg warheads, respectively. The FP-7 retains the missile's useful aerodynamic geometry but substitutes a composite structure, Ukrainian electronics, Ukrainian solid propellant, and changes the mission from interception to surface strike. Fire Point had already reproduced the fourth missile compartment and actuators associated with an S-300/S-400 architecture before moving into propulsion, while Ukrainian industry had already tested a domestic replacement for the 5V55 missile's 48D6 solid-fuel motor by 2020.

The launcher similarly removes part of the S-300 family's infrastructure burden. Instead of a vertical canister arrangement on a specialized multi-axle transporter-erector-launcher (TEL), the FP-7 uses an inclined guide rail on a trailer and a hot launch, with the motor igniting directly from the launcher. This reduces Ukraine's dependence on specialized heavy chassis, erection mechanisms, and canisters when expanding the number of firing units. The unanswered figures are operationally important: Ukraine has disclosed no FP-7 launcher inventory, reload time, missiles allocated per launcher, displacement time after firing or maximum salvo size. A stock of hundreds of missiles therefore would not automatically translate into equivalent firing capacity unless launcher, reload and crew numbers expand alongside missile production.

Production is now the central measurable variable. Fire Point previously discussed an eventual ballistic missile output measured in hundreds per month, but the October 1 announcement does not show that such a rate has been reached, and Zelenskyy's move from first combat use to production indicates that scaling remains underway. At 10 FP-7s per month, the potential annual output reaches 120 missiles and 24 metric tons of payload; 25 per month produces 300 and 60 tons; 50 produces 600 and 120 tons; 100 produces 1,200 and 240 tons. Four launches per day would consume 120 missiles every 30 days and 1,460 annually, meaning even 100 missiles per month would leave a 260-round annual deficit before testing, rejects, and reserves. Fire Point adds another useful industrial metric: each FP-7 requires about 1 metric ton of solid propellant, compared with more than 4.5 tons for the FP-9. Consequently, producing 100 FP-7s monthly would require roughly 100 tons of missile propellant per month and 1,200 tons annually before accounting for manufacturing losses.

That requirement helps explain Fire Point's investment in a new solid-propellant plant in Denmark, where construction is already underway on a production site exceeding 120,000 m². Fire Point says the facility is intended to support 800 to more than 4,000 missiles annually depending on demand, initially covering FP-7, FP-7.x and Flamingo boosters, with operations scheduled by the end of 2027. For the FP-7 alone, 800 missiles would equal 66.7 per month and 160 metric tons of payload annually, while 4,000 would equal 333 per month and 800 tons. The missile itself is only one part of that capacity problem: motors, composite structures, actuators, guidance electronics, warheads, fuzes, launch equipment, and acceptance testing must all reach comparable throughput, or the slowest process will determine completed-missile output.

Ukraine nevertheless entered FP-7 production with more than two decades of experience on Soviet-origin missiles. Ukroboronservice has conducted S-300 repair and service-life-extension work since 2004; Ukraine pursued a 5V55R modernization in 2018 intended to increase its roughly 75 km range toward 150 km; and by 2020 Ukrainian industry was repairing 5V55 missiles and testing domestically produced replacement motors. The FP-7 production also provides an industrial baseline for the FP-7.x interceptor associated with the Freyja program, although surface strike and ballistic interception remain fundamentally different missions. The FP-7.x, at about 7.25 m long, is intended to target ballistic threats at altitudes up to about 20 km, with a wider architecture intended to be connected to European radars and fire control equipment from Saab, Thales, Hensoldt, Weibel, Leonardo and Kongsberg. The relevant connection is manufacturing: both depend on repeatable production of 7 m-class missile structures, solid-propellant motors, actuators and flight-control electronics, making the FP-7's monthly output and reliability concrete indicators of the industrial capacity available to the latter interceptor.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, South Korea, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.