Japanese Submarine Sinks Former USS Juneau in Pacific Anti-Ship Warfare Test Near Guam.

Japan’s Maritime Self-Defense Force delivered the final blow against the decommissioned USS Juneau during Exercise Valiant Shield 2026, proving how allied submarines can add decisive anti-ship firepower in the Philippine Sea. The June 27 sinking, conducted more than 200 nautical miles off Guam, gave U.S. and Japanese forces a realistic test of coordinated strikes against a 17,000-ton naval hull.

The exercise showed how aircraft, warships, and submarines can combine missiles and torpedoes against a complex maritime target. Its main value was the combat data generated from sequential impacts on a former amphibious ship, helping allied navies refine tactics for high-end naval warfare in the Western Pacific.

Related topic: South Korea Selects Hanwha Ocean to Build 6 KDDX Guided Missile Destroyers for Fleet Air Defense.

A Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force submarine fires a heavyweight torpedo at the decommissioned USS Juneau (LPD-10) during Exercise Valiant Shield 2026 in the Philippine Sea, testing allied anti-ship strike coordination and real-world weapon effects against a former U.S. amphibious warship (Picture source: U.S. Navy).

The submarine involved was not officially named in the public SINKEX caption, but the most relevant Japanese undersea participant publicly listed for Valiant Shield 2026 was JS Jingei (SS-515), a Taigei-class diesel-electric attack submarine commissioned in March 2024. The Taigei class is approximately 84 meters long, 9.1 meters in beam, and about 3,000 tonnes in standard displacement, with a crew of roughly 70. It uses diesel-electric propulsion with lithium-ion batteries, a significant change from older lead-acid battery designs because lithium-ion storage allows higher underwater power output, faster recharge cycles, and longer submerged operation at tactically useful speeds.

That battery architecture has direct military value in the Philippine Sea and around the First Island Chain. A conventional submarine must manage its exposure carefully because snorkeling can create radar, infrared, acoustic, and electronic signatures. By reducing the frequency and duration of snorkeling, a Taigei-class submarine can spend more time in a firing position and less time vulnerable to maritime patrol aircraft, surface combatants, and unmanned sensors. This improves its utility for sea denial, intelligence collection, covert tracking, and ambush against surface groups moving through constrained maritime approaches.

The decisive weapon was a submarine-launched heavyweight torpedo fired from 533mm tubes. Japan has not publicly confirmed the exact torpedo used during the exercise, but Taigei-class submarines are associated with the Type 18 heavyweight torpedo, which succeeded the Type 89. The older Type 89 provides a useful baseline: a 533mm weapon of roughly 1.76 tonnes, using wire guidance, active and passive acoustic homing, and a warhead reported at about 267kg. The Type 18 is understood to improve target detection, onboard processing, and propulsion performance, which are critical in shallow, noisy, or cluttered waters where countermeasures and acoustic decoys complicate engagement.

Against a large amphibious transport dock, a heavyweight torpedo is a different class of threat from an above-water missile impact. Anti-ship missiles generally damage the superstructure, sensors, command spaces, flight decks, fuel systems, or machinery areas depending on the impact point and warhead behavior. A heavyweight torpedo attacks the ship below the waterline, where buoyancy, keel integrity, and compartment boundaries determine survivability. The underwater detonation can deform hull plating, fracture frames, rupture piping, open multiple spaces to flooding, and create shock effects that damage propulsion, electrical distribution, and internal fittings beyond the immediate blast area.

The submarine’s armament also includes the UGM-84L Harpoon Block II anti-ship missile, giving Japanese attack submarines a second method of engaging surface ships from outside visual range. Harpoon uses mid-course guidance and active radar terminal homing, flying a low-level sea-skimming profile that reduces reaction time for shipboard defenses. The tactical distinction matters: Harpoon offers stand-off attack from an unexpected bearing, while a heavyweight torpedo provides a closer-range underwater kill mechanism once the target has been located, classified, and brought within firing geometry.

The former USS Juneau was a useful test target because it was a real warship, not a barge or a towed hulk with little internal complexity. The Austin-class amphibious transport dock was about 570 feet long and built to carry Marines, landing craft, vehicles, helicopters, ammunition, fuel, maintenance spaces, machinery rooms, ballast tanks, and a well deck. That internal arrangement produces realistic damage pathways. Blast, fragmentation, fire, progressive flooding, and structural failure do not spread evenly through a ship; they move through compartments, trunks, voids, bulkheads, tanks, and decks in ways that strongly affect whether a vessel is mission-killed, abandoned, or physically sunk.

This is why firing on a former warship has value that computer modeling cannot fully replace. Modeling can estimate warhead effects and structural response, but a live hull provides evidence on how weapons perform after real launch, flight, terminal guidance, impact, detonation, and damage propagation. It also allows crews to practice range coordination, deconfliction, target tracking, firing authorization, post-strike assessment, and safety procedures under conditions closer to wartime execution than simulator events. In a maritime conflict, the question is often not simply whether a weapon hits, but whether the hit disables propulsion, command systems, aviation facilities, sensors, or the ability to continue fighting.

The SINKEX sequence reflected that problem. The former Juneau was subjected to multiple weapon effects before the final submarine torpedo strike, including long-range air-launched anti-ship missile employment by a B-2 Spirit and Harpoon engagement by a P-8A Poseidon. Japanese contributions also included helicopter and surface-launched anti-ship fires. This mix produced a cumulative damage profile across different warhead sizes, approach angles, seeker types, and impact locations. For planners and analysts, that is more useful than a single isolated shot because modern naval engagements are likely to involve layered attacks rather than one weapon fired in isolation.

The exercise also provided a practical test of allied kill-chain integration. Detecting a target, classifying it, assigning weapons, avoiding fratricide, controlling airspace and sea space, sequencing fires, and confirming damage are separate tasks that must be performed under time pressure. In a Western Pacific contingency, those tasks would involve U.S. bombers, maritime patrol aircraft, carrier aircraft, Japanese submarines, destroyers, helicopters, and shore-based sensors. The Juneau sinking showed how those elements can be combined against a large surface target, while also exposing the procedural and technical friction that live-fire events are designed to identify.

The operational implication is that Japan’s conventional submarine force is becoming a central part of allied sea-denial planning, not only a force for coastal defense or anti-submarine patrol. A Taigei-class attack submarine positioned near maritime chokepoints can force an opposing surface group to allocate escorts, aircraft, sonar coverage, and maneuver space to undersea defense. When combined with long-range air-launched missiles, patrol aircraft, surface combatants, and land-based sensors, the submarine adds a submerged threat that complicates route planning and reduces freedom of movement. In practical terms, the Juneau SINKEX was less a demonstration of destruction than a measured rehearsal of how allied forces could hold large naval formations at risk in the Philippine Sea and surrounding approaches.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News