ALERT: U.S. Identifies Venezuelan Military Sites Linked to Drug Trafficking for Potential Strike.

The Wall Street Journal reported on October 30, 2025, that U.S. intelligence agencies have identified several Venezuelan military-controlled sites allegedly tied to drug trafficking operations. Officials say the potential strike plan, now awaiting President Donald Trump’s approval, reflects a hardening U.S. stance toward Nicolás Maduro’s regime.

U.S. officials have confirmed that intelligence agencies have identified several Venezuelan military-controlled sites suspected of handling international drug shipments, a development that could result in military action. The Wall Street Journal reported on October 30, 2025, that possible targets include naval installations, secret airstrips, and ports reportedly used to smuggle narcotics to the Caribbean and Central America. Officials, speaking anonymously, said the plan is pending President Donald Trump’s decision, underscoring a shift in U.S. strategy to confront what authorities describe as a narcotics-driven threat under Nicolás Maduro’s administration.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

U.S. Air Force B-52 bombers conduct long-range flights near Venezuela to test air defenses amid rising tensions. (Picture source: U.S. Department of War)

The list of potential targets in Venezuela signals a dramatic escalation in Washington’s approach. Until now, U.S. counter-narcotics missions have been largely confined to intercepting suspected drug boats in international waters. However, striking military infrastructure on Venezuelan soil would mark the first offensive air campaign on Latin American territory by the U.S. in decades, sharply raising the stakes in an already volatile hemispheric standoff.

In preparation for possible action, the Pentagon has stepped up its aerial posturing in the Caribbean. Over the past two weeks, U.S. Air Force B-52 Stratofortress and B-1B Lancer bombers have conducted long-range flights near Venezuela’s coastline to probe its air defense systems and measure the Venezuelan military's response. On Monday, two B-1Bs flew for nearly 30 minutes between Venezuela’s mainland and its nearby offshore islands, according to publicly available flight-tracking data.

In a rare public move, President Trump has also acknowledged that he has authorized the Central Intelligence Agency to conduct covert actions inside Venezuela. While the specific scope of the operations remains classified, intelligence officials have hinted that the CIA’s expanded role includes both surveillance and pre-strike targeting in support of broader military plans.

The operational concept being developed reportedly centers around precision strikes against Venezuelan naval air stations, covert runways, and regional ports managed or occupied by military forces alleged to be complicit in narcotics trafficking. One U.S. defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, described the facilities as “logistical nerve centers” for the smuggling apparatus, protected under the guise of military activity but functioning as cartel enablers.

From a strategic and legal standpoint, this shift from maritime interdiction to sovereign airstrikes opens a new chapter in American military doctrine. Targeting another nation’s military installations regardless of justification could prompt international backlash and test the limits of what Washington considers a “non-international armed conflict” with transnational criminal organizations. Pentagon lawyers are reportedly scrutinizing the legality of such actions under both U.S. and international law, particularly the War Powers Resolution and the United Nations Charter.

Caracas, meanwhile, has begun to react with alarm. Venezuelan military units have been observed redeploying mobile radar systems and repositioning short-range air defense assets across coastal regions. Open-source intelligence reports indicate the Venezuelan Air Force has activated older Soviet-era SAM sites, including the S-125 Pechora and Buk missile systems, in anticipation of possible engagement.

According to military analysts, any U.S. strikes would likely rely on stealth-capable platforms or standoff munitions launched from outside the engagement envelope of Venezuela’s air defenses. The B-1B, although not stealthy, is capable of deploying long-range precision-guided weapons such as the AGM-158 JASSM, enabling strikes without entering heavily defended airspace.

The Trump administration’s growing frustration with Maduro’s continued grip on power, combined with mounting domestic political pressure over the U.S. fentanyl and cocaine crisis, appears to be fueling the push toward military escalation. By framing Venezuela’s military-run trafficking network as a direct threat to the American homeland, the administration is laying the groundwork for a campaign that merges counter-narcotics operations with elements of regime-change strategy.

Defense insiders suggest the White House is preparing for a phased escalation beginning with symbolic strikes against remote facilities, escalating to broader decapitation of Venezuela’s trafficking infrastructure if Maduro fails to respond. One former senior military commander characterized the plan as “shock therapy,” designed to fracture the power alliance between Venezuela’s armed forces and cartel intermediaries.

For now, the region remains in a high state of alert. Venezuela’s internal security forces have mobilized, while U.S. Southern Command continues surveillance and posture coordination with Colombia and other regional allies. The coming weeks will determine whether the United States chooses to cross a threshold unseen in Latin American conflict since the Cold War, direct strikes on a sovereign government’s military assets in the name of counter-narcotics warfare.

Army Recognition will continue monitoring this developing story as it unfolds across diplomatic, military, and intelligence fronts.

Written by Alain Servaes – Chief Editor, Army Recognition Group
Alain Servaes is a former infantry non-commissioned officer and the founder of Army Recognition. With over 20 years in defense journalism, he provides expert analysis on military equipment, NATO operations, and the global defense industry.