Breaking News
Belgium set to approve purchase of ten NASAMS air defense systems to protect critical NATO military infrastructure.
The Belgian Council of Ministers is reviewing a proposed €3.1 billion ground-based air defense procurement package to reconstitute its national surface-to-air missile capabilities ahead of the NATO Summit in Ankara. The strategic initiative seeks to establish a comprehensive, layered defense network to protect the port of Antwerp, key logistics hubs, and critical transport corridors from advanced low-altitude and medium-range aerial threats. By utilizing existing Dutch framework agreements, the Belgian government aims to significantly accelerate deployment timelines, lower logistical complexities, and enhance operational interoperability with neighboring NATO forces.
The proposed €3.1 billion defense acquisition outlines the procurement of 10 National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System (NASAMS) medium-range batteries and 20 Skyranger short-range air defense systems to fill structural capability gaps left by post-Cold War military reductions. While utilizing a common AIM-120 AMRAAM inventory across both fighter fleets and ground assets optimizes long-term maintenance costs, the package has faced internal political debates regarding European industrial autonomy and the details of initial budgetary breakdowns.
Related topic: Belgium to purchase 20 Skyranger 30 air defense systems to protect key infrastructures from drone attacks

Belgium plans to rebuild its national defense by purchasing ten NASAMS air defense systems to protect its critical infrastructure and strengthen NATO logistics operations after more than 30 years without modern ground-based air defenses. (Picture source: Norwegian MoD)
On July 2, 2026, according to Reuters, Belgium could soon approve a €3.1 billion ground-based air defense package, centered on the acquisition of 10 NASAMS medium-range air defense batteries and 20 Skyranger short-range air defense systems, and the announcement could potentially coincide with the NATO Summit in Ankara on July 7 and 8. According to De Morgen, the NASAMS contract is valued at €1.2 billion, while the remaining funding covers the Skyranger procurement, integration, and supporting capabilities. The package would represent Belgium's first large-scale reconstruction of its ground-based air defense since it disappeared during the post-Cold War reductions of the 1990s.
Although there is broad agreement that Belgium needs modern air defense systems, the procurement has become politically contentious about how much money should be spent, whether to support European or American defense companies, which missiles to choose, and how the overall Belgian air defense should be organized and operated. For Reuters, the Council of Ministers could authorize the acquisition before the NATO summit, allowing the Belgian government to proceed through existing Dutch framework agreements instead of conducting a separate national competition. Using the Dutch procurement framework is intended to shorten contracting timelines, simplify logistics, and increase interoperability with neighboring Dutch forces already operating NASAMS and Patriot.
The €3.1 billion package represents the first phase of a broader €4 billion program allocated to rebuild Belgian ground-based air defense after decades without dedicated surface-to-air missile units. The current package covers 10 NASAMS batteries and 20 Skyranger systems, but it does not complete the future force structure because Belgium still intends to procure a long-range interception capability later in the decade. Apart from the reported €1.2 billion NASAMS contract, the government has not released a detailed financial breakdown for launchers, radars, missiles, support vehicles, training, infrastructure, or sustainment. The NASAMS, for National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System, is jointly developed by Norway's Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace and U.S. company Raytheon and has become one of NATO's principal medium-range air defense systems.
A standard battery normally combines an AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel radar or an equivalent sensor, a Fire Distribution Center (FDC), three to six launcher units, and launch canisters carrying six AIM-120, AMRAAM-ER, or AIM-9X Sidewinder missiles each. Unlike older air defense systems, the NASAMS is designed around a distributed architecture in which radars, launchers, and command elements can operate from separate locations while remaining connected through digital command networks. Belgium is expected to select the AIM-120 AMRAAM because the Belgian Air Force already employs the same missile on its F-35, allowing a common missile inventory, common maintenance procedures, common storage standards, and common training for missile handling personnel.
The system's open architecture also allows future integration of additional sensors, missiles, and command networks, an important consideration for NATO's integrated air and missile defense structure. Current European operators include Norway, the Netherlands, Spain, Finland, Lithuania and Hungary, while Ukraine has demonstrated the system's operational efficiency against Russia's cruise missiles, aircraft and drones. However, according to De Morgen, the political debate that is currently holding up the NASAMS purchase has focused primarily on the interceptor rather than the launcher itself. The AIM-120 AMRAAM uses inertial navigation during the initial phase, receives mid-course corrections through a datalink and activates its own active radar seeker during the terminal engagement phase, allowing fire-and-forget operation after target acquisition.
The missile also equips F-35, F-16, F/A-18 and Eurofighter fleets throughout NATO, making it one of the Alliance's standard beyond-visual-range weapons. For Belgium, selecting the same missile for both fighter aircraft and ground-based launchers would reduce logistical complexity by limiting the number of missile types that must be procured, transported, stored, inspected and maintained. Still, critics inside the governing coalition, particularly the Flemish social-democratic party Vooruit, argue that this approach further strengthens dependence on the U.S. instead of supporting European missile manufacturers. Still according to De Morgen, coalition tensions intensified immediately before the planned approval.
Vooruit questioned continued reliance on American interceptors and reportedly favored Germany's IRIS-T SLM as an alternative medium-range solution using a European missile. The procurement also reportedly received a negative opinion from Belgium's finance inspectors about the lack of a fully detailed breakdown of expenses, providing additional political leverage for parties seeking further review of the acquisition process. At the same time, Prime Minister Bart De Wever and Defense Minister Theo Francken have defended the NASAMS procurement, noting that the system already appears in Belgium's public military strategic planning and offers direct compatibility with Dutch air defense capabilities.
The disagreement, therefore, mainly focuses on procurement methodology, industrial return, long-term supplier dependence, and the strategic balance between European and American defense industries rather than the NASAMS's proven performance. The €3.1 billion package also leaves unresolved the future long-range layer of Belgium's integrated air defense architecture. The NASAMS provides a maximum engagement range of approximately 25 to 40 kilometers but cannot replace dedicated long-range systems capable of defending larger areas against more dangerous aerial threats. Belgium currently plans to procure three long-range batteries beginning in 2029, with SAMP/T NG using Aster missiles and Patriot PAC-3 remaining the principal candidates.
Choosing the SAMP/T NG would strengthen integration with France and Italy and expand the European missile component of Belgium's inventory, whereas the Patriot would increase interoperability with the Netherlands, which has operated the American system since the 1980s and recently expanded its fleet with an additional battery. The decision will determine future radar integration, interceptor logistics, command architecture, and multinational cooperation for decades because long-range air defense systems typically remain in service for several decades after acquisition. The operational rationale behind this air defense renewal reflects Belgium's geographic role inside NATO rather than territorial defense alone.
Belgian military planning identifies the port of Antwerp, rail corridors leading toward Germany, logistics hubs, military infrastructure, and other critical national assets as priority sites requiring permanent protection against aircraft, cruise missiles, and increasingly large numbers of drones. Moreover, NATO reinforcement plans rely heavily on Belgian ports and transportation networks for the movement of personnel, armored vehicles, ammunition, and sustainment supplies toward the Alliance's eastern flank. The F-35s cannot provide continuous protection over fixed infrastructure because combat air patrols are constrained by endurance, sortie generation, and maintenance requirements.
A layered ground-based air defense network therefore provides a persistent protection independent of aircraft availability while reducing vulnerability to saturation attacks involving missiles and drones. If approved, the procurement would mark Belgium's transition from virtually no modern ground-based air defense capability to the foundation of a layered national air defense. The 20 Skyranger systems would provide close-range protection against drones, helicopters, low-flying aircraft and other short-range threats around military bases, logistics sites and critical infrastructure, while the 10 NASAMS batteries would establish the medium-range engagement layer.
A future acquisition of either SAMP/T NG or Patriot would complete the long-range component, allowing Belgium to finally field again short-, medium- and long-range intercept capabilities under a common command-and-control structure. Additionally, the purchase also reflects the wider European effort to rebuild integrated air and missile defense after Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the 2026 U.S.-Iran war exposed the vulnerability of military bases, ports, energy infrastructure, and transportation networks to sustained missile and drone attacks.
Written by Jérôme Brahy
Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.
Explore More Defense News
• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News















