Romania seeks approval for 216 new main battle tanks in €6.5B second-phase plan.

Lawmakers in Bucharest received a request to authorize the second phase of Romania’s MBT recapitalization—up to 216 new tanks plus support variants-costing at €6.5B before VAT. The filing keeps the platform open (Abrams, Leopard 2A8, K2) and would add to the previously approved 54 M1A2 SEPv3s, aligning Romania with NATO-standard 120mm ammo, APS, and digital C2.

DefenseRomania reported on September 29, 2025, that lawmakers in Bucharest received a request to authorize the second phase of Romania’s main battle tank recapitalization, covering 216 new tanks plus support variants at an estimated 6.5 billion euros before VAT, with room for domestic assembly or component production. The filing would sit alongside the previously approved 54 M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams and keeps the final platform choice open, with Abrams, Leopard 2A8, and K2 Black Panther widely viewed as leading candidates. Crucially, this remains a possibility rather than a government announcement, with parliamentary scrutiny and budget mechanics still ahead. The prospective fleet would replace legacy inventory and align Romania with NATO-standard 120 mm tank munitions, active protection, and digital battle management.

Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

Romania’s aging TR-85M1 Bizonul tanks, a heavily modernized T-55 design still armed with a 100 mm gun, are set to be replaced under a proposed multi-billion euro program that could bring Abrams, Leopard 2A8, or K2 Black Panther main battle tanks into Romanian service (Picture source: U.S. DoW).

Romania’s baseline today is the TR-85M1 Bizonul, a deep modernization of the T-55 that retains a 100 mm A-308 rifled gun, a four-person crew, and analog-era ergonomics upgraded with a domestic fire-control suite. Weighing roughly 50 tons, Bizonul adds applique armor and better sights but lacks the protection, powerpack headroom, and networked architecture now common in Western fleets. The platform’s growth ceiling, particularly around passive armor density, APS integration, and sustained mobility with heavier urban kits, limits its viability on NATO’s eastern flank.

Scaling the Abrams fleet would offer immediate commonality with U.S. forces rotating through the Black Sea region. The M1A2 SEPv3 mounts a 120 mm M256 smoothbore capable of firing advanced kinetic penetrators and programmable multi-purpose rounds, backed by third-generation FLIR, improved power management, and the option for Trophy active protection. Its 1,500 hp gas turbine delivers high sprint and acceleration, though at the cost of fuel consumption and weight that stresses bridging and road infrastructure. For Romania, the payoff is mature sustainment, deep ammunition stocks, and a training pipeline aligned with allied heavy brigades.

Germany’s Leopard 2A8 presents a European center-of-gravity alternative. The variant fields the Rheinmetall L55A1 gun with higher chamber pressures, upgraded thermal sights, and EuroTrophy APS as a program of record. With expanding orders across Europe, the A8 offers strong multinational sustainment, shared simulators, and a logistics base already embedded in NATO. It is heavier than K2 but benefits from an extensive upgrade pathway, standardized spares, and well-understood life-cycle costs. Industrial participation could leverage Romanian facilities if Berlin and industry partners agree on localized assembly and depot-level work.

South Korea’s K2 Black Panther brings a lighter footprint and high-end mobility. At roughly 55 to 56 tons with an autoloaded 120 mm L/55, in-arm hydropneumatic suspension for hull-lean firing positions, and a compact powerpack, K2 delivers rapid acceleration, a strong cross-country ride, and a high rate of fire. Seoul has paired competitive timelines with licensing and workshare options elsewhere in Europe, a model that would mesh with Bucharest’s push for domestic production value and sovereign sustainment.

Crews would gain first-round hit probability at longer ranges, superior night-fight acuity, and meaningful protection against modern anti-tank guided missiles once APS is fielded. Digital battle management compresses sensor-to-shooter timelines, while modern suspensions and transmissions raise tempo across Dobrogea’s mixed riverine and loess terrain and the rolling approaches of Moldavia. Just as important, standard NATO ammunition and diagnostics streamline joint training and maintenance with allied formations.

The choice doubles as a deterrence signal and an industrial strategy. With Russia’s war against Ukraine ongoing and persistent maritime pressure in the western Black Sea, Bucharest is seeking heavy armor that can deploy fast, survive, and be sustained at scale. Parliament will weigh delivery speed, local jobs, and full enabler packages like bridge layers, ARVs, and mine-breaching vehicles. Whether Romania ultimately selects Abrams, Leopard, K2, or a mixed fleet, the direction is clear: a transition from legacy T-series derivatives to a digitally networked heavy force built to NATO standards remains firmly on the table, even if the government has yet to make it official.