US Navy eyes NextGen Submarine Rescue System for 72-hour global response to deep-sea emergencies.

On September 2, 2026, the Naval Sea Systems Command's Undersea Special Mission Systems Program Office (PMS390) opened an Industry Day in Washington, D.C., to define requirements for the NextGen Submarine Rescue System (NGSRS). The effort aims to replace the legacy Submarine Rescue Diving and Recompression System (SRDRS) with a modular architecture capable of initiating global recovery operations within 72 hours. By reducing aircraft load counts and integrating onboard decompression, the U.S. Navy seeks to expand commercial vessel compatibility and shorten strategic deployment timelines.

The U.S. Navy initiated the NextGen Submarine Rescue System program on September 2, 2026, targeting a 72-hour worldwide Time to First Rescue (TTFR). The NGSRS architecture replaces the legacy SRDRS with modular rescue vehicles capable of handling internal submarine atmospheres up to 5 ATA while reducing total airlift requirements for commercial and military transport aircraft.

Related topic: USS North Dakota rejoins US Navy battle force as new GAO report highlights worsening US submarine crisis

At the heart of the Submarine Rescue Diving Recompression System (SRDRS) is the PRM-1 Falcon, a tethered, remotely operated rescue vehicle that can dive down to 2,000 feet (610 meters), mate with a submarine hatch at angles up to 45 degrees, and rescue up to 16 personnel per trip. (Picture source: US Navy)

On September 2, 2026, the U.S. Navy opened its NextGen Submarine Rescue System (NGSRS) Industry Day in Washington, D.C., to define a replacement for the current Submarine Rescue Diving and Recompression System (SRDRS) with a smaller, modular system able to begin recovering sailors from a disabled submarine anywhere in the world within 72 hours. The effort is led by Naval Sea Systems Command's Undersea Special Mission Systems Program Office (PMS390), with Time to First Rescue, or TTFR, as the central operational metric. The US Navy wants multiple small rescue vehicles, integrated decompression, fewer aircraft loads, compatibility with commercial cargo aircraft and C-17-class military transports, and a smaller footprint allowing more commercial ships to serve as vessels of opportunity.

The replacement is sought within five years of a design-development contract award, while broader submarine search, escape and rescue modernization places Initial Operational Capability no earlier than 2032 and Full Operational Capability in 2040. The September 2 event follows a Reverse Industry Day held on January 20-21, 2026. The January Reverse Industry Day included Rear Admiral Jonathan Rucker, then Program Executive Officer for Attack Submarines, Captain Michael McGlone of PMS390, NAVSEA contracting personnel, and officials responsible for submarine rescue and new technologies. The requirement already centered on a 72-hour worldwide TTFR, with attention focused on system weight, airlift sorties, movement between airport and seaport, availability of a suitable surface ship, installation time aboard that ship, and transit to the DISSUB position. The September effort expands this work into vehicle design, ownership, contracting, operation, maintenance, certification and sustainment arrangements.

PMS390 wants greater use of commercially available products, services and parts, combined with lower maintenance demand, higher reliability and redundancy, and lower life-cycle costs. This would change a support structure that has depended heavily on specialized equipment and contractor services. For instance, Oceaneering International received a contract valued at $156.7 million, covering submarine rescue readiness, engineering, logistics, maintenance, training, certification, and worldwide support from September 10, 2020, through June 30, 2026. The capability being replaced is not a single rescue submarine but a set of systems covering localization, underwater intervention, rescue, pressure management, and surface support. The inventory includes the Submarine Rescue System, Assessment/Underwater Work System (AUWS), Submarine Rescue System-Rescue Capable System, Submarine Rescue System-Transfer Under Pressure, Light Weight Mooring System, and Side-Looking Sonar. The AUWS provides remotely operated underwater intervention and sonar functions before rescue, including inspection of the disabled submarine and work around its rescue seat.

The current rescue capability covers 180 to 2,000 feet of seawater, or 54.9 to 609.6 m, broadly corresponding to the 610 m rescue depth used by several Western submarine rescue systems. It can mate with the common NATO submarine rescue seat with the DISSUB inclined by up to 45 degrees and operate when internal submarine pressure reaches 5 atmospheres absolute. Each sortie carries two tenders and 16 rescuees, meaning the evacuation of a 100-person crew would require at least seven sorties if all survivors were recovered by the vehicle at its maximum stated capacity. That capacity makes launch, recovery, underwater transit, mating, and transfer cycle times nearly as important as maximum diving depth. The existing architecture also provides recompression and decompression treatment at pressures reaching 6 ATA, with capacity for 62 people. This is required because flooding or other damage can leave a surviving submarine compartment pressurized, and personnel exposed to elevated pressure cannot necessarily be returned immediately to 1 ATA without risk of decompression sickness.

The NextGen requirement seeks to move more of that pressure-management function into the rescue vehicle itself. PMS390 wants the vehicle to recover personnel from a DISSUB atmosphere reaching 5 ATA, although 3 ATA may be considered if it produces a major reduction in vehicle dimensions and transport weight. Decompression using air or regulated oxygen must be possible inside the rescue vehicle while it is aboard the vessel of opportunity and after reaching pier side. Portable emergency hyperbaric chambers are also envisaged for critical casualties requiring onward medical evacuation. This creates a direct engineering tradeoff because pressure-resistant hull volume, oxygen equipment, environmental controls, and space for decompression add mass to a vehicle that simultaneously has to become smaller and easier to transport. The U.S. Navy is therefore balancing pressure capability and medical capacity against the weight and dimensions that directly determine strategic mobility.

The 72-hour requirement is primarily a logistics and system-integration problem rather than a question of submersible speed. The current U.S. mission framework maintains 24/7/365 submarine rescue readiness, but different contingencies have different timelines. U.S. submarine sea trials are supported against a 72-hour TTFR objective, while an unplanned worldwide response using the current Submarine Rescue Diving and Recompression System is associated with a 96-hour TTFR. A partnered international response is likewise expected within 96 hours when a U.S. or partner global rescue system is unavailable because of maintenance, exercises, or another commitment. Equipment must be prepared, transported to an airfield, loaded onto strategic transports, flown to a suitable airport, unloaded, moved to a seaport, installed aboard a vessel of opportunity, and carried to the casualty. Weather, sea state, water depth, and the submarine's angle on the seabed can then further delay mating and evacuation.

This sequence explains why reducing aircraft loads is operationally important. Removing several loads can eliminate complete cargo-loading, flight, unloading, and ground transport sequences rather than merely lowering transportation costs. It also reduces the probability that one delayed aircraft prevents the entire rescue system from becoming operational, particularly when specialized modules depend on each other before the first rescue sortie can begin. PMS390 consequently wants the complete system transportable aboard a reasonable number of widely available commercial cargo aircraft while retaining compatibility with the C-17 Globemaster III or comparable military transports. Commercial transport expands the potential airlift pool beyond U.S. Air Force strategic transports that could have competing missions during a crisis. The Navy also explicitly seeks a significant reduction in the number of aircraft required compared with the existing rescue enterprise.

The same approach applies at sea. PMS390 wants a sufficiently small footprint to increase the number of vessels of opportunity capable of embarking the rescue package and is considering arrangements allowing existing shipboard cranes to handle rescue equipment. This would reduce dependence on ships with specialized launch-and-recovery installations, while also cutting the amount of equipment that has to be transported through a port before the vessel can depart for the casualty location. Individual modules are intended to remain portable and configurable, with compatibility for saturation-diving operations. An open-system approach is intended to allow later modifications without major increases in weight, cost or integration time. Other requirements include a removable transfer skirt, configurable lock-in and lock-out capability and commercial certification by a member of the International Association of Classification Societies.

The wider modernization effort extends beyond the rescue vehicle because a DISSUB must first be found, contacted and stabilized. U.S. submarine casualty procedures progress through SUBLOOK, SUBMISS and SUBSUNK conditions as uncertainty over the submarine's status develops into evidence of a loss or confirmation of its position on the seabed. The operational sequence covers search and localization, communications and damage assessment, stabilization of the submarine and crew, and finally escape or rescue. Stabilization can require remotely operated systems to remove debris obstructing a rescue seat and delivery of carbon-dioxide-removal equipment, oxygen, drinking water, food and medical supplies. These actions can extend crew survival while rescue assets are still being transported and assembled. The rescue mission therefore begins well before a crewed rescue vehicle reaches the submarine.

Future requirements include automatic transmission of a submarine's position without requiring crew action and real-time underwater communications that remain available after loss of submarine electrical power. They also include trained pressurized and unpressurized escape options and wide-area seabed search, identification and inspection at maximum U.S. submarine operating depths and in high sea states. Search assets are additionally expected to support object recovery from the seabed. Robotic, uncrewed and autonomous underwater vehicles have a direct role in shortening the interval between SUBMISS and localization, particularly when the last known position leaves a large search area. The same architecture is intended to improve interoperability with AUKUS partners and other submarine-rescue organizations. This would allow U.S. rescue vehicles, sensors, communications equipment, aircraft and surface ships to operate with allied assets when geography makes a multinational response faster.

The geographic record helps explain the emphasis on worldwide deployment. Nine U.S. submarine collisions or groundings identified since 2000 occurred predominantly away from U.S. home waters, with eight of the nine taking place outside U.S. territorial waters. A rescue capability concentrated near a single American naval base therefore does not match the geographic distribution of submarine operations and past accidents. Future planning has considered dependence on international rescue partners, a single improved U.S. system and multiple U.S. systems. Sole reliance on International Submarine Escape and Rescue Liaison Office partners is the least preferred approach, while the longer-term objective favors at least two U.S. capabilities. East Coast and West Coast systems would provide redundancy while shortening deployment distances toward different operating theaters.

International systems demonstrate both the achievable rescue depth and the logistical burden involved. The NATO Submarine Rescue System jointly operated by France, Norway and the United Kingdom can evacuate personnel from a submarine at 610 m and uses transfer-under-pressure arrangements capable of handling up to 72 people. Deploying the complete system, however, involves about 350 tonnes of equipment, 27 trucks and several aircraft. During the September 1, 2026 Flying Fish exercise, the NATO system's Submarine Rescue Vehicle was checked against a loading simulator reproducing the internal dimensions and cargo arrangement of a C-17A Globemaster. Heavy support equipment was tested against an A400M Atlas configuration, including the first use of the A400M for NSRS transport planning. The U.S. NextGen SRS is consequently aimed less at extending rescue depth than at changing this logistics equation with integrated decompression, fewer aircraft loads, a smaller surface footprint, and compatibility with a larger population of vessels of opportunity.

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, South Korea, Ukraine, Russia, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News