U.S. General Atomics and MBDA to Arm MQ-9B and Gambit 6 With 100-Km SPEAR Missiles.

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems and MBDA signed an agreement on July 21, 2026, to integrate the SPEAR air-to-surface missile with the MQ-9B remotely piloted aircraft and Gambit 6 collaborative combat aircraft. The move would give both platforms a standoff strike capability against mobile ground targets, air-defense systems, and naval vessels beyond 100 kilometers.

SPEAR integration would allow MQ-9B and Gambit 6 to attack defended targets while remaining outside many short-range air-defense zones. The effort builds on recent Brimstone 3 and Paveway IV qualification work for Britain’s Protector RG Mk1, supporting a broader shift toward longer-range, survivable strike options for crewed-uncrewed operations.

Related topic: U.S. and Norway Advance MQ-9B Unmanned Aircraft Integration With 350-Km Joint Strike Missile.

GA-ASI and MBDA will integrate the SPEAR stand-off missile with the MQ-9B and Gambit 6, combining U.S. unmanned aircraft with a European weapon designed for networked strikes against mobile, defended and time-sensitive targets (Picture source: General Atomics).

SPEAR is a turbojet-powered miniature cruise missile weighing less than 100 kilograms, measuring under two meters in length and 180 millimeters in diameter. MBDA states that its range exceeds 100 kilometers, compared with the much shorter engagement distances normally associated with anti-armor missiles carried by MQ-9-series aircraft. The missile uses inertial navigation and GPS during the midcourse phase, followed by a multimode seeker for terminal engagement. It can operate in fire-and-forget mode, receive semi-active laser designation or use a two-way data link for target updates, retargeting and abort commands after launch. The F-35B installation is designed for four missiles in each internal weapons bay, while MBDA also offers a three-round external launcher, demonstrating that SPEAR was engineered around multiple-weapon carriage rather than one missile per hardpoint.

The guidance arrangement is more important than the missile’s physical dimensions. Inertial and satellite navigation can take SPEAR to a target area without continuous control, while radar, laser and networked guidance provide different ways to complete the engagement. Radar guidance supports autonomous attacks in poor visibility; laser designation allows an aircraft, ground unit or another sensor to identify a specific aim point; and the data link permits an operator to redirect the missile if a mobile launcher changes position. MBDA identifies air-defense vehicles, ballistic-missile launchers, defended structures, main battle tanks, self-propelled guns, armored personnel carriers, maneuvering vehicles and naval vessels as target categories. A multi-effect warhead with selectable fuzing allows the missile to vary its action against armor, equipment or structures, although MBDA has not disclosed the warhead weight, penetration figures, seeker frequency bands or resistance to specific electronic countermeasures.

For MQ-9B operators, SPEAR would change the aircraft’s strike function more than its surveillance function. MQ-9B has nine external hardpoints and a stated external payload capacity of 2,155 kilograms, with a 24-meter wingspan and endurance exceeding 40 hours in some configurations. These figures do not establish how many SPEAR missiles it will carry because station load limits, launcher weight, aerodynamic drag, and required sensor or fuel carriage remain undisclosed. They do indicate sufficient aircraft payload margin for several missiles. An MQ-9B could therefore remain outside the engagement envelope of shorter-range surface-to-air systems, detect or receive coordinates for a target, and launch a salvo without waiting for a crewed strike aircraft. This would be useful against dispersed coastal-defense batteries, artillery, radar vehicles and missile launchers that appear briefly before relocating. It would not make MQ-9B suitable for routine penetration of an intact long-range air-defense network; its employment would still depend on stand-off distance, electronic support, route planning and external targeting.

Gambit 6 addresses a different requirement. GA-ASI introduced the jet-powered design in November 2025 for electronic warfare, suppression and destruction of enemy air defenses, and deep precision strike, with a signature-reducing internal weapons bay and modular mission equipment. The company plans to offer airframes for international procurement from 2027 and European missionized aircraft from 2029, but it has not published speed, range, payload, or bay dimensions. Internally carried SPEAR missiles could allow Gambit 6 aircraft to approach closer than MQ-9B, release several weapons against separate elements of an air-defense battery and withdraw while the missiles receive updated targeting data from other aircraft or ground nodes. The operational objective is not simply to replace a crewed fighter. It is to distribute sensors, electronic attack equipment and weapons across more aircraft, forcing an opponent to track and engage several threats while preserving crewed aircraft for command, sensing or higher-value strike tasks.

The U.S. dimension requires a distinction between industrial availability and an American military requirement. The announced integration applies to Gambit 6, not automatically to the U.S. Air Force FQ-42A, which GA-ASI developed from the earlier Gambit 2 concept. In June 2026, the Air Force awarded General Atomics an engineering, manufacturing, and production contract for the FQ-42A and stated an objective of procuring more than 150 collaborative combat aircraft by the end of the decade. No U.S. service has selected SPEAR, and neither company disclosed discussions with the Department of Defense. Nevertheless, the integration gives American planners a tested option in a weapon category they are actively examining: compact stand-off munitions that can be carried in numbers, attack moving targets, accept updates after launch and support air-defense suppression without committing a crewed aircraft to the highest-risk portion of the mission. It also provides access to a non-U.S. missile design at a time when sortie generation and magazine depth are receiving greater attention than single-weapon range alone.

Industrially, the memorandum establishes cooperation on interfaces and certification, but it does not yet establish joint production. Integration will require launcher design, structural and vibration analysis, electrical connections, mission-computer software, data-link compatibility, captive-carry flights, safe-separation trials and live firing. GA-ASI completed comparable work for Brimstone 3 and Paveway IV over six years under British Ministry of Defence oversight, which illustrates the likely scope even when the aircraft and weapon are already mature. MBDA remains responsible for SPEAR’s missile design and European supply chain, while GA-ASI controls aircraft integration, flight testing and configuration management. No assembly site, workshare percentage, U.S. production license, missile quantity, schedule or funding source has been announced. The agreement should therefore be treated as an integration framework intended to widen the addressable market for both companies, not evidence that SPEAR will be manufactured in the United States.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News