Army Recognition Forum Index Army Recognition
You have a collection of pictures, information and description of modern military equipment and armoured vehicles from all countries join this group. This forum is the property of Army Recognition magazine http://www.armyrecognition.com/index.php
 
   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Iranian DRAGON and TOW copies

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Army Recognition Forum Index -> Antiarmor Systems
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jackehammond



Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Posts: 330
Location: Indiana, USA

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2006 9:35 am    Post subject: Iranian DRAGON and TOW copies Reply with quote



Folks,

I guarantee you will find the following two brochures interesting. What everyone in the US Army is trying to figure out is "Why on earth would the Iranians want to copy the DRAGON?????"

Finally, I wonder if Iran is paying royality fees to Boeing Missiles and Hughes Missiles. javascript:emoticon('Wink')
Wink

Jack E. Hammond

Photos are thumbnails. Click to enlarge


Iranian copy of the DRAGON which they also offer for export. The US Army and US Marines were unbelievably happy to retired the DRAGON. Its percentage chance of a hit was extremely low, even for a well trained US Marine DRAGON gunner who were given more missiles to practice with than the US Army.



Iranian Copy of the 1st generation TOW missiles. This came as a shock to the US Army as they thought that when an Iranian ambassador on a US talk show stated they did not need US TOWs as they produced their own they thought he was referring to the Russian SAGGER. There is one difference though. Note the missile container. It looks more like the container used for the early Chinese RED ARROW 1 which was a cross between a MILAN and HOT. The brochure states it can defeat reactive armor boxes so the extendable probe must have a small HEAT warhead to predetonate reactive armor boxes like the TOW-2A. While offered for export in the ground launcher version the Iranians most likely decided to reverse engineer (ie what we call in plain English "copying") the TOW due to the needs of their AH-1 Super Cobras that Iran acquired before November 1979. The Iranians admit with no reservation that if it had not been for the TOW armed Cobras Iran would have lost the war to Iraq. It was the only thing that stopped the Iraq armored assaults.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Army Recognition Forum Index -> Antiarmor Systems All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group